13.07.2015 Views

wharton's prescription for health care - Wharton Magazine

wharton's prescription for health care - Wharton Magazine

wharton's prescription for health care - Wharton Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEATUREdoing, which is what your patients and members want youto do. Your HMO could pay <strong>for</strong> bone marrow transplants,but your premiums would be higher. What should be theprotocol <strong>for</strong> very low birthweight babies? A lot of HMOs aretrying to adopt clinical pathways or guidelines.”Kissick’s image of <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> is as a “quasi-regulated marketsystem with certain checks and balances ... where <strong>health</strong><strong>care</strong> institutions develop budgets, receive capitation payments,and then allocate those funds based on input from consumersas well as providers.” Pauly sees a supply and demand systemwhere <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers such as HMOs closely monitortheir physicians and reward those who are responsive topatients. Patients <strong>for</strong> their part choose a <strong>health</strong> plan based onthe plan’s cost, the services covered and its reputation.All observers agree that whether the debate is aboutrationing or cost containment or better service, one of thegreat promises <strong>for</strong> improvement lies in in<strong>for</strong>mation technologyand its potential <strong>for</strong> better allocating resources,measuring quality and conveying in<strong>for</strong>mation to buyers andconsumers — ideally with the goal of using in<strong>for</strong>mationmore wisely to improve <strong>care</strong> as well as hold down costs.“The systems and incentives are right, provided we havegood measures of outcomes,” notes Danzon. “We still havea long way to go be<strong>for</strong>e we have reliable report cards [to helpus] compare plans on both outcomes and costs.“At the same time, there has been enormous growth inthis industry. It’s a very exciting development and the U.S.is leading the world.”T HE ALUMNIAccording to figures from the <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> systems department,alumni of the program fall into the followingcategories: Approximately 30 percent work in <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong>delivery organizations, including hospitals, managed <strong>care</strong>,long-term <strong>care</strong> and clinical practice; 21 percent in consulting;eight percent in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology firmsor equipment manufacturers; six percent in financial servicesand insurance; eight percent in educational or researchinstitutions or foundations; three percent in federal, state orlocal government, and the remainder in other <strong>health</strong>-relatedpositions.As a group, <strong>Wharton</strong>’s <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> alumni graduates arean unusually cohesive and activist bunch. Two years ago,<strong>for</strong> example, 10 alumni and students spent a week in Beijingoffering quality management training to 60 administratorsfrom China’s preeminent teaching hospitals.In addition, the <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> alumni make up one of onlytwo alumni clubs based on industry (rather than geography),and they sponsor numerous symposia, lectures andconferences, including October’s three-day celebration ofthe department’s 25th anniversary entitled “RedesigningOur Future.”At that event, the Robert D. Eilers Memorial Lecturer wasJohn Eisenberg, WG’76, chairman of medicine and physician-in-chiefat Georgetown University. The speaker istypically an individual who is distinguished and visible inthe field of <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong>. “That we have someone of that caliberin our own alumni ranks is a sign of the program’ssuccess,” says Rosoff.“We were the first and the biggest program to train physiciansin management,” notes Pauly. “Many of them wentoff to be leaders in managed <strong>care</strong> plans. And we also createda kind of fifth column in medical schools, people like JohnEisenberg who are spreading the word that physicians haveto start thinking about management issues.” ”Lisa David, WG’84: partner,APM Inc.“Everyone involved with servingpatients recognizes that we are in <strong>for</strong>a period of tumultuous change,”notes Lisa David, a partner in theconsulting firm of APM, Inc., in Manhattan.“As a consultant, there is a lotmore intensity and pressure in whatwe do, but in many respects it’s easierbecause you don’t have to sellanybody on the need <strong>for</strong> change. It’sa matter of helping them come upwith the right answer.“We are doing more to improvebasic <strong>care</strong> than we did eight yearsago,” adds David, who has beenwith APM since 1985. “The interestsof doctors, hospitals, alternativeproviders and so <strong>for</strong>th are comingtogether. So you start to get wholeanswers instead of improving thingson the margin. And <strong>for</strong> people withgood business training there are better<strong>care</strong>er opportunities than everbe<strong>for</strong>e, including all kinds of new businessesas well as new roles in all thetraditional <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> organizations.”APM works mostly <strong>for</strong> <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong>providers, including hospitals, largemedical groups and institutionalprovider networks. “We are looking<strong>for</strong> cost efficiencies, better coordinationof services from the patients’perspectives, and the delivery ofhigher quality, more proactive <strong>care</strong>,”David says. This could mean designinga provider network’s relationshipwith managed <strong>care</strong> companies and/orhelping decide the network’s organizationalstructure. APM also looks athow hospital processes are configuredto deliver <strong>care</strong>, and analyzes in<strong>for</strong>mationsystems to determine appropriatetechnology use.In some respects, David says, “thedelivery structure is being redesignedby the <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong> providers themselves.What is not being answeredare the policy issues of who is coveredand how many standards of <strong>care</strong> wehave in this country. The current dialoguewill get worse in terms of whatwe are willing to pay <strong>for</strong>. We willhave more uninsured, and there willbe a greater discrepancy betweenwhat those with coverage will haveaccess to, and what those who don’t,won’t.”There are reasons <strong>for</strong> concernover <strong>health</strong> <strong>care</strong>, David says, “but thepotential <strong>for</strong> doing the right thing isthere ... For every company I seecoming in to make money, there isanother company that is getting paidto do it better from a patient’s perspective.A good number of managed<strong>care</strong> companies do well because theyactually are doing a better job ofworking with the patient, not justrestricting access. There are modelsout there to follow.”11W HARTON ALUMNI MAGAZINE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!