13.07.2015 Views

wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence - Wavelets ...

wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence - Wavelets ...

wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence - Wavelets ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annual Reviewswww.annualreviews.org/aronlineWAVELET TRANSFORMS 397tions. Are there some elementary coherent structures? Do <strong>their</strong> mutualinteractions have a universal character? Is it possible <strong>to</strong> compute the flowevolution with a reduced number of degrees of freedom relative <strong>to</strong> the verylarge number of Fourier components otherwise necessary? This reductioncould correspond <strong>to</strong> a projection of Navier-S<strong>to</strong>kes equations on thosecoherent structures or on some related functional bases well localized inphysical space.Being very uncomfortable with these two separate descriptions of <strong>turbulence</strong>,I was immediately enthusiastic when, in 1984, A. Grossmann <strong>to</strong>ldme about the <strong>wavelet</strong> transform theory he was developing from Morlet’soriginal ideas. His theory had the promise of a unified approach whichcould reconcile these two descriptions <strong>and</strong> allow us <strong>to</strong> analyze a turbulentflow in terms of both space <strong>and</strong> scale at once, up <strong>to</strong> the limits of theuncertainty principle. Another reason, rather naive, for the immediateappeal of <strong>wavelet</strong>s was the fact that the Morlet <strong>wavelet</strong> evoked <strong>to</strong> me theshape of Tennekes <strong>and</strong> Lumley’s eddy (Tennekes & Lumley 1972) proposed<strong>to</strong> model <strong>turbulence</strong>, <strong>and</strong> of some coherent structures whose existencehad been conjectured by Ruelle (D. Ruelle, personal communication,1983) <strong>and</strong> then observed by Basdevant in his numerical simulations oftwo-dimensional flows (Basdevant & Couder 1986). Indeed, it seems muchbetter <strong>to</strong> decompose a turbulent field in<strong>to</strong> such localized oscillations offinite energy as <strong>wavelet</strong>s, rather than in<strong>to</strong> space-filling trigonometric functionswhich do not belong <strong>to</strong> the L2(II n) functional space <strong>and</strong> therefore arenot of finite energy.In the context of <strong>turbulence</strong>, the <strong>wavelet</strong> transform may yield someelegant decompositions of turbulent flows (Section 5.1). The continuous<strong>wavelet</strong> transform offers a continuous <strong>and</strong> redundant unfolding in termsof both space <strong>and</strong> scale, which may enable us <strong>to</strong> track the dynamics ofcoherent structures <strong>and</strong> measure <strong>their</strong> contributions <strong>to</strong> the energy spectrum(Section 5.2). The discrete <strong>wavelet</strong> transform allows an orthonormal projectionon a minimal number of independent modes which might be used<strong>to</strong> compute or model the turbulent flow dynamics in a better way thanwith Fourier modes (Section 5.3).2. WAVELET TRANSFORM PRINCIPLES2.1 His<strong>to</strong>ryThe <strong>wavelet</strong> transform originated in 1980 with Morlet, a French researchscientist working on seismic data analysis (Morlet 1981, 1983; Goupillaudet al 1984), who then collaborated with Grossmann, a theoretical physicistfrom the CNRS in Marseille-Luminy. They developed the geometricalformalism of the continuous <strong>wavelet</strong> transform (Grossmann et al 1985,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!