13.07.2015 Views

v2004.06.19 - Convex Optimization

v2004.06.19 - Convex Optimization

v2004.06.19 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E.6. VECTORIZATION INTERPRETATION, 409By (1267), the product P 1 XP 1 is the one-dimensional orthogonal projectionof X in isomorphic R m2 on the range of vectorized P 1 because, for rankP 1 =1and P 21 =P 1 ∈ S m , (confer (1258))P 1 XP 1 = yT Xyy T y〈 〉yy T yyT yyTy T y = y T y , X y T y = 〈P 1 , X〉 P 1 = 〈P 1 , X〉〈P 1 , P 1 〉 P 1(1281)The coefficient of orthogonal projection 〈P 1 , X〉= y T Xy/(y T y) is also knownas Rayleigh’s quotient. E.10 When P 1 is rank-one symmetric as in (1280),R(vecP 1 XP 1 ) = R(vec P 1 ) in R m2 (1282)andP 1 XP 1 − X ⊥ P 1 in R m2 (1283)The test for positive semidefiniteness, then, is a test for nonnegativity ofthe coefficient of orthogonal projection of X on the range of each and everyvectorized extreme direction yy T (§2.6.4) from the positive semidefinite conein the ambient space of symmetric matrices.E.10 When y becomes the j th eigenvector s j of diagonalizable X , for example, 〈P 1 , X〉becomes the j th eigenvalue: [58, §III]〈P 1 , X〉| y=sj=s T j( m∑λ i s i wiTi=1s T j s j)s j= λ jSimilarly for y = w j , the j th left-eigenvector,〈P 1 , X〉| y=wj=w T j( m∑λ i s i wiTi=1w T j w j)w j= λ jA quandary may arise regarding the potential annihilation of the antisymmetric part ofX when s T j Xs j is formed. Were annihilation to occur, it would imply the eigenvalue thusfound came instead from the symmetric part of X . The quandary is resolved recognizingthat diagonalization of real X admits complex eigenvectors; hence, annihilation could onlycome about by forming Re(s H j Xs j) = s H j (X +XT )s j /2 [28, §7.1] where (X +X T )/2 isthe symmetric part of X, and s H j denotes the conjugate transpose.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!