<strong>Animal</strong>s 2013, 3 253<strong>in</strong>fections result<strong>in</strong>g from poor hygiene of physicians [120], only after Joseph Lister’s paper On theAntiseptic Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of the Practice of Surgery (1867)—prompted by Pasteur’s f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs—was theimportance of hand-wash<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>strument sterilization before surgical procedures and child deliveryf<strong>in</strong>ally acknowledged, lead<strong>in</strong>g to a drastic drop <strong>in</strong> deaths from puerperal fever and post-surgical sepsis.Until then, previous efforts to make hand-wash<strong>in</strong>g a standard procedure had been ridiculed by themedical class.Pasteur, a professor of chemistry with a doctoral thesis on crystallography, would turn his attentionto biology <strong>in</strong> 1848 [121]. He began by unravel<strong>in</strong>g the biological nature of fermentation (the <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>geffect of oxygen on fermentation is still called the “Pasteur effect”), mov<strong>in</strong>g on to devise solutions ofgreat economic value by tackl<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>e and beer spoil<strong>in</strong>g, as well as silkworm disease, all of which heproperly identified as be<strong>in</strong>g caused by microbes. Together with Claude Bernard, a close friend, hewould later develop the process of pasteurization to destroy microorganisms <strong>in</strong> food. Pasteur beganhypothesiz<strong>in</strong>g that microbes could also be the causative agents of many diseases affect<strong>in</strong>g humansand other animals. Together with his disciples, most notably Emile Roux (1853–1933), he would go onto identify Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, the “septic vibrio” (now Clostridium septicum), thecausative agents of anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) and chicken cholera (Pasteurella multocida), be<strong>in</strong>gthe first to develop vacc<strong>in</strong>es for these zoonotic diseases, as well as for Sw<strong>in</strong>e Erypselas, thussett<strong>in</strong>g the foundations of modern immunology [122]. However, it would be Pasteur’s successfuluse of a therapeutic vacc<strong>in</strong>e aga<strong>in</strong>st rabies <strong>in</strong> humans that would grant him <strong>in</strong>ternational celebritystatus [107,122–124].Pasteur’s work required the experimental <strong>in</strong>fection of numerous animals, as well as <strong>in</strong>flict<strong>in</strong>gsurgical wounds to test antiseptic techniques and dis<strong>in</strong>fectant products, which made him a prime targetof antivivisectionists. Either by genu<strong>in</strong>e conviction or pragmatic convenience, amongst the ranks ofPasteur’s critics for his use of animals, one could easily f<strong>in</strong>d opponents of vacc<strong>in</strong>ation and the germtheory. Pasteur would frequently receive hate letters and threats, mostly for his <strong>in</strong>fection studies ondogs, although he also used chickens, rabbits, rodents, pigs, cows, sheep, and non-human primates(Figure 4). Pasteur was, however, more sensitive to animal suffer<strong>in</strong>g than most of his Frenchcounterparts. Not only was he uneasy with the experiments conducted—although sure of theirnecessity—he would also always <strong>in</strong>sist animals be anesthetized whenever possible to preventunnecessary suffer<strong>in</strong>g. He would even use what we now call “humane endpo<strong>in</strong>ts” (for a def<strong>in</strong>ition,see [125]): <strong>in</strong> a detailed description of his method for the prophylactic treatment of rabies (from 1884),the protocol for <strong>in</strong>fect<strong>in</strong>g rabbits with the rabies virus (for ulterior extraction of the sp<strong>in</strong>al cord toproduce a vacc<strong>in</strong>e), he stated that: “The rabbit should beg<strong>in</strong> to show symptoms on the sixth or seventhday, and die on the n<strong>in</strong>th or tenth. Usually the rabbit is not allowed to die, but is chloroformed on thelast day <strong>in</strong> order to avoid term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>fections and unnecessary suffer<strong>in</strong>g” [126]. Furthermore, he wouldbe<strong>com</strong>e directly responsible for sav<strong>in</strong>g countless animals from the burden of disease and subsequentcull<strong>in</strong>g [5,107,113,127,128].
<strong>Animal</strong>s 2013, 3 254Figure 4. This full-page illustration of Pasteur <strong>in</strong> his animal facility was published <strong>in</strong>Harper’s Weekly <strong>in</strong> the United States, on 21 June 1884. At this time, there was moderatecuriosity on Pasteur’s work <strong>in</strong> the US, which would <strong>in</strong>tensify after his first successfulhuman trials of a therapeutic vacc<strong>in</strong>e for rabies <strong>in</strong> 1885. In the article, the reader isreassured that the use of dogs is both humane and justified <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terest of mank<strong>in</strong>d. Theuse of other species, however, is barely mentioned [5]. Source: Images from the History ofMedic<strong>in</strong>e, U.S. National Library of Science.Robert Koch, a practic<strong>in</strong>g rural physician, would follow the tradition of the great German/Prussianphysiologists of his time (and <strong>in</strong>deed was a student to many of them), provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>valuable contributionsto medical knowledge through animal research, ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the field of bacteriology and pathology. Hisfamous “Koch postulates” would play an important role <strong>in</strong> microbiology Along with his associates,
- Page 6 and 7: Animals 2013, 3 243Amidst the list
- Page 8 and 9: Animals 2013, 3 245Nevertheless, th
- Page 10 and 11: Animals 2013, 3 247“soul”, was
- Page 13 and 14: Animals 2013, 3 250experiments that
- Page 15: Animals 2013, 3 252Just like today,
- Page 19 and 20: Animals 2013, 3 256was awarded, whi
- Page 21 and 22: Animals 2013, 3 258hedonistic utili
- Page 24: Animals 2013, 3 261philosopher Raym
- Page 27 and 28: Animals 2013, 3 26414. Rupke, N.A.
- Page 29 and 30: Animals 2013, 3 26655. Porter, R. T
- Page 31 and 32: Animals 2013, 3 26895. Otis, L. Joh
- Page 33 and 34: Animals 2013, 3 270135. Linton, D.S
- Page 35 and 36: Animals 2013, 3 272175. Rollin, B.E