<strong>The</strong> Flute<strong>The</strong> flute (or reed pipe) was played in the <strong>Temple</strong> on twelve special festivities. ** <strong>The</strong> flute was used in Alexandria to accompany the hymns at the love feasts of the early <strong>Christian</strong>s, up to theyear 190, when Clement of Alexandria introduced the harp in its place.<strong>The</strong>se were: the day of killing the first, and that of killing the second Passover, the first day of unleavened bread,Pentecost, and the eight days of the Feast of Tabernacles. Quite in accordance with the social character of thesefeasts, the flute was also used <strong>by</strong> the festive pilgrim-bands on their journey to Jerusalem, to accompany ‘thePsalms of Degrees,’ or rather of ‘Ascent’ (Isa 30:29), sung on such occasions. It was also customary to play it atmarriage feasts and at funerals (Matt 9:23); for according to Rabbinical law every Jew was bound to provide atleast two flutes and one mourning woman at the funeral of his wife. In the <strong>Temple</strong>, not less than two nor more thantwelve flutes were allowed, and the melody was on such occasions to close with the notes of one flute alone.Lastly, we have sufficient evidence that there was a kind of organ used in the <strong>Temple</strong> (the Magrephah), butwhether merely for giving signals or not, cannot be clearly determined.<strong>The</strong> Human VoiceAs already stated, the service of praise was mainly sustained <strong>by</strong> the human voice. A good voice was the one qualificationneedful for a Levite. In the second <strong>Temple</strong> female singers seem at one time to have been employed (Ezra2:65; Neh 7:67). In the <strong>Temple</strong> of Herod their place was supplied <strong>by</strong> Levite boys. Nor did the worshippers anymore take part in the praise, except <strong>by</strong> a responsive Amen. It was otherwise in the first <strong>Temple</strong>, as we gather from1 Chronicles 16:36, from the allusion in Jeremiah 33:11, and also from such Psalms as 26:12; 68:26. At the layingof the foundation of the second <strong>Temple</strong>, and at the dedication of the wall of Jerusalem, the singing seems to havebeen antiphonal, or in responses (Ezra 3:10,11; Neh 12:27,40), the two choirs afterwards apparently combining,and singing in unison in the <strong>Temple</strong> itself. Something of the same kind was probably also the practice in the first<strong>Temple</strong>. What the melodies were to which the Psalms had been sung, it is, unfortunately, now impossible to ascertain.Some of the music still used in the synagogue must date from those times, and there is no reason to doubt thatin the so-called Gregorian tones we have also preserved to us a close approximation to the ancient hymnody of the<strong>Temple</strong>, though certainly not without considerable alterations.But how solemn must have been the scene when, at the dedication of Solomon’s <strong>Temple</strong> during the service ofpraise, ‘the house was filled with a cloud, even the house of Jehovah; so that the priests could not stand to minister<strong>by</strong> reason of the cloud: for the glory of Jehovah had filled the house of God’! (2 Chron 5:13,14) Such music, andsuch responsive singing, might well serve, in the Book of Revelation, as imagery of heavenly realities (Rev 4:8,11;5:9,12; 7:10-12), especially in that description of the final act of worship in Revelation 14:1-5, where at the closeof their antiphony the two choirs combine, as at the dedication of the second <strong>Temple</strong>, to join in this grand unison,‘Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth’ (Rev 19:6,7; comp. also Rev 5:13).Chapter 4<strong>The</strong> Officiating Priesthood‘And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never takeaway sins.’—Hebrews 10:11<strong>The</strong> PriesthoodAmong the most interesting glimpses of early life in the church is that afforded <strong>by</strong> a small piece of rapidly-drawnscenery which presents to our view ‘a great company of the priests,’ ‘obedient to the faith’ (Acts 6:7). We seem tobe carried back in imagination to the time when Levi remained faithful amidst the general spiritual defection (Exo32:26), and then through the long vista of devout ministering priests to reach the fulfilment of this saying ofMalachi—part admonition, and part prophecy: ‘For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seekthe law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts’ (Mal 2:7). We can picture to ourselves how they
who ministered in holy things would at eventide, when the <strong>Temple</strong> was deserted of its worshippers, gather to speakof the spiritual meaning of the services, and to consider the wonderful things which had taken place in Jerusalem,as some alleged, in fulfilment of those very types that formed the essence of their office and ministry. ‘For thisthing was not done in a corner.’ <strong>The</strong> trial of Jesus, His condemnation <strong>by</strong> the Sanhedrim, and His being delivered upto the Gentiles, must have formed the theme of frequent and anxious discussion in the <strong>Temple</strong>. Were not their ownchief priests implicated in the matter? Did not Judas on that fatal day rush into the <strong>Temple</strong>, and wildly cast the‘price of blood’ into the ‘treasury’? On the other hand, was not one of the principal priests and a member of thepriestly council, Joseph of Arimathea, an adherent of Christ? Did not the Sanhedrist Nicodemus adopt the sameviews, and even Gamaliel advise caution? Besides, in the ‘porches’ of the <strong>Temple</strong>, especially in that of Solomon, ‘anotable miracle’ had been done in ‘that Name,’ and there also its all-prevailing power was daily proclaimed. It speciallybehoved the priesthood to inquire well into the matter; and the <strong>Temple</strong> seemed the most appropriate place forits discussion.<strong>The</strong> Number of Priests<strong>The</strong> number of priests to be found at all times in Jerusalem must have been very great, and Ophel a densely inhabitedquarter. According to Jewish tradition, half of each of the twenty-four ‘courses,’ into which the priesthoodwere divided, were permanently resident in Jerusalem; the rest scattered over the land. It is added, that about onehalf of the latter had settled in Jericho, and were in the habit of supplying the needful support to their brethrenwhile officiating in Jerusalem. Of course such statements must not be taken literally, though no doubt they are substantiallycorrect. When a ‘course’ was on duty, all its members were bound to appear in the <strong>Temple</strong>. Those whostayed away, with such ‘representatives of the people’ (or ‘stationary men’) as, like them, had been prevented from‘going up’ to Jerusalem in their turn, had to meet in the synagogues of their district to pray and to fast each day oftheir week of service, except on the sixth, the seventh, and the first—that is, neither on the Sabbath, nor on thedays preceding and succeeding it, as the ‘joy’ attaching to the Sabbath rendered a fast immediately before or afterit inappropriate.Symbolism of the Priesthood/MediationIt need scarcely be said, that everything connected with the priesthood was intended to be symbolical and typical—the office itself, its functions, even its dress and outward support. <strong>The</strong> fundamental design of Israel itself was to beunto Jehovah ‘a kingdom of priests and an holy nation’ (Exo 19:5,6). This, however, could only be realised in ‘thefulness of time.’ At the very outset there was the barrier of sin; and in order to gain admittance to the ranks ofIsrael, when ‘the sum of the children of Israel was taken after their number,’ every man had to give the half-shekel,which in after times became the regular <strong>Temple</strong> contribution, as ‘a ransom (covering) for his soul unto Jehovah’(Exo 30:12,13). But even so Israel was sinful, and could only approach Jehovah in the way which Himself opened,and in the manner which He appointed. Direct choice and appointment <strong>by</strong> God were the conditions alike of thepriesthood, of sacrifices, feasts, and of every detail of service. <strong>The</strong> fundamental ideas which underlay all and connectedit into a harmonious whole, were reconciliation and mediation: the one expressed <strong>by</strong> typically atoning sacrifices,the other <strong>by</strong> a typically intervening priesthood. Even the Hebrew term for priest (Cohen) denotes in its rootmeaning‘one who stands up for another, and mediates in his cause.’ ** This root-meaning (through the Arabic) of the Hebrew word for priest, as one intervening, explains its occasionalthough very rare application to others than priests, as, for example, to the sons of David (2 Sam 8:18), a mode ofexpression which is thus correctly paraphrased in 1 Chronicles 18:17: ‘And the sons of David were at the hand ofthe king.’For this purpose God chose the tribe of Levi, and out of it again the family of Aaron, on whom He bestowed the‘priest’s office as a gift’ (Num 18:7). But the whole characteristics and the functions of the priesthood centred inthe person of the high-priest. In accordance with their Divine ‘calling’ (Heb 5:4) was the special and exceptionalprovision made for the support of the priesthood. Its principle was thus expressed: ‘I am thy part and thine inheritanceamong the children of Israel’; and its joyousness, when realised in its full meaning and application, foundvent in such words as Psalm 16:5, 6: ‘Jehovah is the portion of mine inheritance and of my cup: Thou maintainestmy lot. <strong>The</strong> lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places; yea, I have a goodly heritage.’
- Page 1 and 2: The Temple—Its Ministry and Servi
- Page 3 and 4: Judaism was, at the time of its com
- Page 5 and 6: a special surprise awaited those wh
- Page 7 and 8: High-priest’s PalaceAt the opposi
- Page 9 and 10: may be found, call upon Him while H
- Page 11 and 12: south) also led into the Court of t
- Page 13 and 14: chamber above it, called Abtinas, w
- Page 15 and 16: * There was also a small wicket gat
- Page 17 and 18: mourners and those under ecclesiast
- Page 19 and 20: that the wood they brought should a
- Page 21: principle by the Rabbis. What instr
- Page 25 and 26: In the Temple of HerodOf course the
- Page 27 and 28: times made it a matter of cabal, cr
- Page 29 and 30: lamps in the Temple; those of the h
- Page 31 and 32: sinners to be saved by the substitu
- Page 33 and 34: since it would already belong unto
- Page 35 and 36: lock four-and-twenty priests were n
- Page 37 and 38: The Burnt-Offering, the Sin- and Tr
- Page 39 and 40: the sinfulness of our nature (sexua
- Page 41 and 42: offering of completion. ** It alway
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 7At Night in the Temple‘B
- Page 45 and 46: Far over the mountains of Gibeon th
- Page 47 and 48: number, to show that he would begin
- Page 49 and 50: tion or a mode of oath.This formula
- Page 51 and 52: The Slaying of the LambThe opening
- Page 53 and 54: another angel came and stood at the
- Page 55 and 56: The Order of PsalmsThe following wa
- Page 57 and 58: the Maccabees laid down the princip
- Page 59 and 60: labours which made ‘void the Sabb
- Page 61 and 62: Scripture References To It/The ‘P
- Page 63 and 64: occurs in the seventh month (of res
- Page 65 and 66: were, however, despatched only seve
- Page 67 and 68: Day 15. Purim Proper.* The Megillat
- Page 69 and 70: Passover: ‘The Egyptian Passover
- Page 71 and 72: as tithes of the flock). But the Ch
- Page 73 and 74:
‘Save now, I beseech Thee, Jehova
- Page 75 and 76:
(Instead of the 14th day Chagigah)(
- Page 77 and 78:
The Mishnah AccountAs detailed in t
- Page 79 and 80:
Pieces of the broken cake with ‘b
- Page 81 and 82:
and when He ‘prayed, saying: O my
- Page 83 and 84:
the Temple. What passed there need
- Page 85 and 86:
public purposes might be begun. Thu
- Page 87 and 88:
* The Rabbinical statement is, that
- Page 89 and 90:
The Three Chief Features of the Fea
- Page 91 and 92:
them on the altar. As he entered by
- Page 93 and 94:
toward the east, and they worshippe
- Page 95 and 96:
signal for Israel’s host on their
- Page 97 and 98:
the Sabbatical, and the Jubilee yea
- Page 99 and 100:
Weakness of the LawIt may sound str
- Page 101 and 102:
Sanhedrim were appointed to see to
- Page 103 and 104:
the Holy Place. After that nothing
- Page 105 and 106:
telegraphed, by the waving of flags
- Page 107 and 108:
might be acceptable unto God, and H
- Page 109 and 110:
(about the beginning of March), and
- Page 111 and 112:
account for it. According to one ve
- Page 113 and 114:
On PurificationsThe Burning of the
- Page 115 and 116:
separates man from God, defilement
- Page 117 and 118:
eing hollowed beneath.* Or Gihon. A
- Page 119 and 120:
washed his clothes, and bathed. The
- Page 121 and 122:
The Offering of Firstfruits in the
- Page 123 and 124:
mother, brother and sister (Num 6:7
- Page 125 and 126:
In Shab. 127, a, six such things ar
- Page 127 and 128:
praise Him in the firmament of His
- Page 129 and 130:
usy an afternoon, there should have
- Page 131:
should be defiled; but that they mi