13.07.2015 Views

Affordable Care Act - the Virginia Municipal League

Affordable Care Act - the Virginia Municipal League

Affordable Care Act - the Virginia Municipal League

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PenaltiesLarge employers can face penaltiesfor ei<strong>the</strong>r (i) not offering minimumessential coverage to full-timeemployees and <strong>the</strong>ir dependents, or(ii) offering coverage that is unaffordableor does not provide minimumvalue. There are a lot of importantterms in that statement. First, withfew exceptions, any standard healthinsurance plan available will qualify as“minimum essential coverage” under<strong>the</strong> act (dental or vision-only planswill not, for example). “Dependents”means children up to age 26, but notspouses. “Minimum value” meansthat <strong>the</strong> plan must have <strong>the</strong> samevalue as a bronze level plan soldthrough <strong>the</strong> new health insuranceexchange in <strong>Virginia</strong>; so unless youself-insure, this is something you cansimply confirm with your insurancebroker. Exchanges are state-based onlinemarketplaces in which individualscan seek subsidized health insurancecoverage. Beginning Oct. 1, individualsin every state will be able to shopfor health insurance and compareplans through <strong>the</strong> marketplace.The “affordable” part is <strong>the</strong> termemployers need to worry about.Under <strong>the</strong> act, a plan is consideredaffordable if <strong>the</strong> employee’s share of<strong>the</strong> premium, for <strong>the</strong> employee only,does not exceed 9.5 percent of hishousehold income. For employerswho don’t know what <strong>the</strong>ir employee’shousehold income is (most, I suspect),<strong>the</strong> act allows employers to use <strong>the</strong>income from that employee’s W-2for <strong>the</strong> calculation. Note that <strong>the</strong> actrequires employers to offer coverageto dependents, but that coverage doesnot have to be affordable.The penalties that will be assessedagainst any large employer for notoffering adequate, affordable coveragefall under two categories. First is <strong>the</strong>penalty for not offering coverage atall. Under this scenario, if any fulltimeemployee seeks coverage through<strong>the</strong> exchange and that employee alsoreceives a subsidy for such coverage,<strong>the</strong> employer will be fined $2,000per year for each full-time employee,disregarding <strong>the</strong> first 30 full-timeemployees (assessed monthly). Notethat one full-time employee receivinga subsidy through <strong>the</strong> exchange willresult in a penalty for each full-timeemployee (after <strong>the</strong> first 30).If a locality offers coverage, but<strong>the</strong> coverage is not affordable, that localitymay be fined only for employeeswho actually receive subsidies through<strong>the</strong> exchange, at <strong>the</strong> rate of $3,000per year, assessed monthly. Thepenalty under this scenario is cappedat <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>the</strong> locality could befined for not offering any coverage atall. These amounts will increase withinflation.Full-timeemployeesIn order to avoid penalties, an employermust offer coverage to all fulltimeemployees and <strong>the</strong>ir dependents(technically, 95 percent of all full-timeemployees is enough, but it might behelpful to leave a margin of error).A full-time employee is one who, at<strong>the</strong> time of hire, is expected to work30 or more hours per week. Manyemployers, including many localities,will have employees whose hours arenot easily predicted. For example,employees who fill-in for o<strong>the</strong>rs while<strong>the</strong>y are on leave, or employees workingmore than one part-time job, maywork unpredictable hours.The act creates a system foremployers to determine whichemployees will be deemed full-time.In <strong>the</strong> simplest terms, this systeminvolves measuring <strong>the</strong> hours workedby variable-hour employees for a setperiod of time, determining if <strong>the</strong>ymet <strong>the</strong> 30-hour per week threshold,and if so, offering <strong>the</strong>m coverage for alimited period of time. While <strong>the</strong> detailsmake this calculation somewhatcomplicated, <strong>the</strong>y are worth learningand understanding. Employers needto realize that when an employeeapplies for a subsidy through <strong>the</strong> exchange,<strong>the</strong> exchange will look to <strong>the</strong>employer to verify questions of coverageand hours worked. Verifying anemployee’s hours worked will be <strong>the</strong>only way to avoid paying undue penalties.Tracking part-time employees’hours is extremely important.The act is new and complicated,and many areas of uncertainty remain.While it may seem overwhelming,it is important for localities tokeep up with this information. Thebottom line: The only way to makesound budget decisions about healthcare is to understand <strong>the</strong> <strong>Affordable</strong><strong>Care</strong> <strong>Act</strong>’s requirements.About <strong>the</strong> authorJessica Rogers is a local government attorneywith <strong>the</strong> Richmond law firm of SandsAnderson. Her practice focuses on educationand employment law. Contact her at jrogers@sandsanderson.com or 804-783-7260.10 <strong>Virginia</strong> Town & City | april 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!