Cumulative i-TORQUE Index - Nancy Mulvany

index qualityAACR2 index excellence, 17.1bad indexes (poor quality) problem, 9.2, 10.15, 16.12educational needs, 9.2–3full-text search checks on, 10.15indexing rates and, 8.5turnaround times and, 8.3, 9.1working in The Zone at low rates without sacrificing, 8.6–7workshops on, 9.3“Index vs. Full-text search” usability study (Barnum, Henderson, Hood, Jordan), 17.12–13indexable pagescontract agreements on additional deliverables, 5.13–15See also text (in indexable documents)The IndexerBell articles (web links), 3.9Henige's treatment of, 3.4Vonnegut letter on indexers, 18.11“Indexer” license plates, 14.16ph“Indexer” sticker, 6.17indexersASI's focus on new vs. established indexers, 9.5burnout in, 16.13, 14certification issue, 9.3and classification system/taxonomy design, 5.2, 6.15and deadlines, 16.13, 14Duden on, 6.7Henige's treatment of, 3.4hiring practice at Microsoft Learning, 18.2ideal indexer (CMS-15 image), 7.2–3in Index (VA), 4.17phvs. information architects, 17.10misperception of in the publishing world, 9.4, 5office assistants (pets), 21.17ph, 22.15ph“Offices of Two Indexers,” 15.15ph, 17.17phOpen eBook Forum as without, 8.12profile data (“Indexers Reveal Themselves”), 1.16–17, 7.17–18“Taxes & Indexers,” 14.13–14Vonnegut on, 18.11websites for, 12.8, 14.8, 15.14See also indexing businesses; indexing jobs; indexing profession; indexing rates; interviews;job markets; societies of indexers“Indexers Find Index in Rural Virginia,” 4.17ph“Indexer's Nightmare,” 9.17“Indexers' Office Assistants,” 21.17ph, 22.15phI-TORQUE CUMULATIVE INDEX (ISSUES 1–23; JAN. 2003–MAY/JUNE 2005) 26