Leo J. Vander Lans Water Treatment Facility Expansion

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Reduction of Plant Residuals• Existing plant’s (and other similar AWTF) overall recoveryis 77%.– RO Waste = 14%– MF & Other Waste = 9%• Expanded plant’s overall recovery is 92%– RO Waste = 7%– MF & Other Waste = 1%
Plant <strong>Expansion</strong> Design Criteria – UV-AOP• Expand UV system and incorporateadvanced oxidation with hydrogenperoxide addition• Design for 2-log NDMA removal• Design for 0.5-log 1,4 Dioxane removal• Existing UV System will remain inoperation and will be interfaced with newreactors
Page 1 and 2: Leo J. Vander Lans Water Treatment
Page 3 and 4: WRD Overview• Since 1959, protect
Page 5 and 6: Case Study AreaLocation of Alamitos
Page 7 and 8: Background - LVL Planned Expansion
Page 9: Existing Plant• Title 22 source w
Page 12 and 13: ̶12Expansion Challenges• Additio
Page 14 and 15: 14Residuals Production (Sewer Disch
Page 16 and 17: Plant Expansion Design Criteria - M
Page 18 and 19: Pilot Testing on Third-Stage RO
Page 22 and 23: LVLAWTF Expansion - Site PlanNew 3
Page 24 and 25: Plant Expansion Design Criteria - S
Page 27: Leo J. Vander Lans Water Treatment

Leo J. Vander Lans Water Treatment Facility Expansion

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?