13.07.2015 Views

Volume. 35, No. 2 july. 2011 - The Chest and Heart Association of ...

Volume. 35, No. 2 july. 2011 - The Chest and Heart Association of ...

Volume. 35, No. 2 july. 2011 - The Chest and Heart Association of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Chest</strong> & <strong>Heart</strong> Journal Vol. <strong>35</strong>, <strong>No</strong>.-2, July <strong>2011</strong>dosing <strong>and</strong> maximize Omalizumab therapy. <strong>The</strong>reis, at present, no reported clinical experience withsuch approaches. 9,10,11CostOmalizumab is considerably more expensive thanconventional asthma therapy. <strong>The</strong> cost <strong>of</strong>treatment may range from $4,000 to $20,000 peryear, depending on the dose, with an average <strong>of</strong>approximately $12,000 per year. This compareswith approximate costs per year <strong>of</strong> $1,280 forMontelukast, $2,160 for the combination <strong>of</strong>Fluticasone dipropionate <strong>and</strong> Salmeterol, <strong>and</strong> $680for extended release <strong>The</strong>ophylline. 12Response to treatmentResponse to treatment can take several weeks tobecome apparent. 11 Among patients in a clinicaltrial who had had a response to Omalizumab by 16weeks, 87% had done so by 12 weeks. <strong>The</strong>se datasuggest that patients should be treated for at least12 weeks before efficacy is assessed. Given thatserum IgE levels <strong>and</strong> the numbers <strong>of</strong> FcåRIsincrease after therapy is discontinued 12 , it seemsthat treatment needs to be continued for efficacyto persist, but no studies have been reported onthe duration <strong>of</strong> effects after discontinuation. Iftreatment is interrupted before nine months haveelapsed since the last injection, treatment shouldbe resumed at the dose initially prescribed. 11,12Dosing may need to be adjusted in the event <strong>of</strong>substantial changes in body weight (Table 1).Adverse EffectsPotential safety concerns identified by the Food<strong>and</strong> Drug Administration (FDA) in reviewing trialdata on Omalizumab included risks <strong>of</strong> thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> cancer <strong>and</strong> anaphylaxis. Cancerdeveloped in more patients exposed toOmalizumab than in those who received placebo(20 <strong>of</strong> 4127 [0.5%] <strong>and</strong> 5 <strong>of</strong> 2236 [0.2%],respectively). <strong>The</strong>y were predominantly epithelialor solid-organ cancers; one case <strong>of</strong> haematologicor lymphatic cancer was noted. Since the majority<strong>of</strong> patients treated with Omalizumab have beenobserved for only a year, the effect <strong>of</strong> longerexposure or <strong>of</strong> use in patients who are at increasedrisk for cancer is not known. <strong>The</strong>refore,Omalizumab probably should not be used inpatients with a history <strong>of</strong> cancer or a strong familyhistory <strong>of</strong> cancer until this risk relationship isbetter understood. 11,12,13Omalizumab is intended to prevent any risk <strong>of</strong>anaphylaxis, since the agent cannot interact withIgE that is already bound to cell surfaces. However,in clinical trials, three patients (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!