Female Economic Empowerment in the ERF Region

Table 5: Ordered probit results(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Age-0.007 0.003 -0.009 0.009 -0.0020.842 0.936 0.791 0.810 0.945Age sq.0.022 0.010 0.024 0.003 0.0160.637 0.824 0.602 0.949 0.734Female0.092 0.018 0.038 0.103 0.0900.505 0.908 0.805 0.579 0.628Years of education0.010 0.007 0.008 0.001 0.0020.509 0.664 0.611 0.949 0.884Health (1 to 5)0.242 0.249 0.244 0.245 0.2410.012 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.013Household income -0.393 -0.280 -0.340 -0.345 -0.403=2 (coping)0.057 0.177 0.106 0.096 0.054Household income -0.574 -0.440 -0.520 -0.467 -0.551=3 (difficult)0.015 0.063 0.030 0.050 0.022Household income -0.638 -0.533 -0.577 -0.677 -0.712=4 (very difficult) 0.038 0.086 0.064 0.032 0.025Work-to-family -0.053 -0.054 -0.098(no conflict)0.694 0.687 0.473Family-to-work 0.348 0.333 0.317(no conflict)0.012 0.016 0.023Matched0.149 0.1320.409 0.464Female × Matched0.246 0.2110.440 0.508Positive deviations-0.012 -0.0110.043 0.055Female ×-0.004 -0.002Positive deviations0.703 0.872Negative deviations0.001 0.0020.861 0.803Female ×0.011 0.012Negative deviations0.641 0.599Pseudo-R 2 0.019 0.015 0.020 0.020 0.024Note: The number of observations is 294. The dependent variable is ‘overall life satisfaction’with values ranging from zero to 10. The figures in each cell are the coefficients (top) and the p-values of the two-sided tests of significance (bottom). The reference category for householdincome dummies is “Living comfortably on present income (=1)”. The threshold estimates havebeen omitted from the output. The design weights available in the data set have been used toobtain nationally representative figures.