13.07.2015 Views

INSIDE: - Potters Guild of BC

INSIDE: - Potters Guild of BC

INSIDE: - Potters Guild of BC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jack Sures,Cont'd from Page 4do not necessarily apply to craft objects,which come from a very different historicaltradition. By transgressing perimeters, leavingedges unfinished and collapsing differencesbetween image and object, Sures’ sculpturalmurals negotiate their position within the artworld on their own terms. Long concludes,“Rather than turn murals into another type<strong>of</strong> painting, or vessels into another form <strong>of</strong>sculpture, Sures shows that it is ultimatelymore radical and more productive for theceramic art object to retain the frame <strong>of</strong> craft”(69). Amen to that!Julia Krueger contributes a playful yettheoretically-sophisticated essay that exploresSures’ use <strong>of</strong> animal imagery. She introducesCharles Darwin, who warned againstconclusions about natural selection basedsolely on the existing geological record—afterall, much <strong>of</strong> the earth is inaccessible, andnot all creatures left fossilized traces. Just so,one cannot trace a linear path through Sures’use and development <strong>of</strong> animal imagery,which culminates in a creature known as a“Bandicoot,” after the Australian marsupialthat Sures’ unique quadruped resembled.Untitled, 1987; underglaze pencil, black glaze, porcelain, 12 x 49 x 49 cm. Collection <strong>of</strong> theMoose Jaw Museum Art Gallery.Krueger introduces core craft concepts such asworkmanship and the presence <strong>of</strong> the hand tocritique Sures’ work, echoing Long’s assertionthat concepts developed in art history cannotfully account for the diversity and materiality<strong>of</strong> craft. She includes several small drawingsin her essay to demonstrate the artist’smovements between graphic and ceramicexpression, emphasizing the use <strong>of</strong> the doodlein his vibrant surface design. Exploring howSures gouged and worked his surfaces muchas an animal might, she concurs with GlennAdamson that “craft is not a classification <strong>of</strong>objects but . . . a way <strong>of</strong> doing things” (83).The final essay by craft historian SandraAlfoldy examines Sures as a precursor to thecontemporary DIY, paradisciplinary or postmodernmaker, arguing that the generationaldivide <strong>of</strong>ten posited between older, establishedmakers and emerging artists obscuresimportant commonalities. Alfoldy describesSures as an “alpha maker,” one who “designsand builds cool stuff” (93). Throughout hiscareer, Sures was innovative, experimentaland charismatic; he challenged disciplinaryboundaries and infused his work with a sort<strong>of</strong> playful irony that resonates with todays“hipster” DIY makers.With its beautiful photographs, solidhistorical research and provocative essays,this catalogue is a treat to read, a welcomeintroduction to an artist who should be betterknown and a model <strong>of</strong> scholarship to inspireothers documenting Canada’s craft history.CreteMoroccoBurmaOct. 8-23, 2012 Nov. 5-26, 2012 January 2013<strong>Potters</strong> <strong>Guild</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>BC</strong> Newsletter . July/August 20125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!