16.07.2015 Views

Statistical Determination of Genre in Biblical Hebrew - Institute for ...

Statistical Determination of Genre in Biblical Hebrew - Institute for ...

Statistical Determination of Genre in Biblical Hebrew - Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evidence <strong>for</strong> an Historical Read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Genesis 1:1–2:3 651<strong>Hebrew</strong> do not. Inf<strong>in</strong>itive constructs provide the sett<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>of</strong>ten mark<strong>in</strong>g acircumstantial clause. Volitives (jussives, imperatives, and cohortatives)<strong>in</strong>dicate what one <strong>in</strong>dividual wants the action <strong>of</strong> himself (s<strong>in</strong>gularcohortative) or others (jussive, imperative, and plural cohortative) tobe, but it is not that action. Inf<strong>in</strong>itive absolutes modify f<strong>in</strong>ite verbs.Participles are used attributively, substantively, or predicatively (asverbs). When they are used this last way they do not <strong>in</strong>dicate the ma<strong>in</strong>action.There are four f<strong>in</strong>ite verb <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Biblical</strong> <strong>Hebrew</strong> (see Glossary,p. 725): the preterite (wayyiqtol), the imperfect (yiqtol), the perfect(qatal) and the waw-perfect (w•qatal). Rarely, the preterite occurswithout the <strong>in</strong>itial waw patach (or qamets) be<strong>for</strong>e the prefix (such as <strong>in</strong>the last two verbs <strong>of</strong> Psalm 8:6) and, there<strong>for</strong>e, could be misconstruedas an imperfect, but <strong>for</strong> the most part it is a sequential past tense. 39 Of allf<strong>in</strong>ite verbs the distribution <strong>of</strong> preterites with<strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>ite verbs shouldmost clearly mark whether a passage is track<strong>in</strong>g events through time.The imperfect can be a present/future, general present or modal whenthe action is ongo<strong>in</strong>g or anticipated or it can express habitual actionwhen the action is <strong>in</strong> the past.Preterites with prefixed waw-consecutives must come first <strong>in</strong> asentence. If another syntactic element is fronted (it comes first <strong>in</strong> thesentence <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> the verb to <strong>in</strong>dicate a contrast), the verb cannot bea preterite, but will usually be a perfect. The perfect is normally a nonsequentialpast tense, although word order constra<strong>in</strong>ts demand that itbe used <strong>in</strong> a sequential sense if an explicit subject precedes what wouldotherwise be a preterite.The waw-perfect is per<strong>for</strong>ce clause <strong>in</strong>itial and is used to expresshabitual action <strong>in</strong> the past and sequential action <strong>in</strong> the future. It cont<strong>in</strong>uesthe <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> the verbs that precede it. It is <strong>of</strong>ten found <strong>in</strong> proceduralliterature, such as the <strong>in</strong>structions <strong>for</strong> assembl<strong>in</strong>g the tabernacle(Exodus 25–31).4.2 <strong>Statistical</strong> Study: Two QuestionsThe statistical portion <strong>of</strong> this study asks two pert<strong>in</strong>ent questions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!