Overlooked astrophysical signatures of axion(-like) particles

More documents

Recommendations

Info

X-raysYohkohSXT S60 o N60 oSXT equatorHomestakeGALLEXν’sComparison <strong>of</strong> normalized probability distribution functions formed from powerspectra <strong>of</strong> data from SXT equator (red), SXT N60-S60 (green), Homestake (black),and GALLEX (blue). Note that the SXT (red) and GALLEX data are equatorial, andthe other two are not. Frequencies are given in cycles per year.D.O. Caldwell, P.A. Sturrock, Astroparticle Phys. 23 (2005) 543
Page 1: Overlooked astrophysical signatures
Page 4: How can ~axions show-up in celestia
Page 7 and 8: On solving the Coronal Heating Prob
Page 9 and 10: ↛
Page 11 and 12: 2 nd component
Page 13 and 14: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y
Page 15 and 16: Quiet-Sun X-ray observationsRHESSIT
Page 17 and 18: FLARESThe Electron “Problem”G.
Page 19 and 20: Flares T flare ≈ T core199 flares
Page 21 and 22: 1 st component ~B 2 4 cases ~ consi
Page 23 and 24: The long-term evolution of AR 7978
Page 25 and 26: FLARES origin?L x↑3rdThe Electro
Page 27 and 28: Magnetic field computed from the Ze
Page 29 and 30: Solar metalicity
Page 31 and 32: Serious disagreement between the pr
Page 33 and 34: The Ne abundance has been inferred
Page 35 and 36: Solar ν’s & X-raysoscillations /
Page 37: X-raysYohkohSXT S60 o N60 oSXT equa
Page 42 and 43: work in progress • solar metalici
Page 44 and 45: plumes … are denser than their su
Page 46 and 47: 9σ 4.2σQVexpected S-Zexpected S-Z
Page 49 and 50: M.K. Browning et al., ApJL 648 (200

Overlooked astrophysical signatures of axion(-like) particles

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?