The Forgiveness Reconciliation Inventory: A model for assessing ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Group Differences• Conducted a MANOVA with a discriminant analysis post hoc across FRIsubscales between clinical and nonclinical populations• λ = .885, F(4, 195) = 6.22, p < .001Scale Correlation Coefficients Standardized CoefficientsExploration .19 -.39Role .88 .98Change .68 .58Outcome .50 -.36• Functions at group centroids:• Clinical: .49• Nonclinical -.26Balkin, R. S., 201128
Group DifferencesGroup N M SD dclinical 69 20.57 6.34 0.12Nonclinical 13119.85 5.92clinical 69 20.15 6.52 0.65Nonclinical 131 16.18 5.60clinical 69 24.26 6.09 0.54Nonclinical 13120.93 6.33clinical 69 22.25 7.45 0.39Nonclinical 13119.52 6.51Balkin, R. S., 201129
Page 1 and 2: The Forgiveness Reconciliation Inve
Page 3 and 4: Religious Conceptualization ofForgi
Page 5 and 6: Assessing a Client’s Likelihoodto
Page 7 and 8: Forgiveness Scale• Respondents ar
Page 9 and 10: Forgiveness Likelihood Scale• dev
Page 11 and 12: Forgiveness Likelihood Scale• Res
Page 13 and 14: Forgiveness Likelihood Scale• Hig
Page 15 and 16: Balkin, R. S., 201115
Page 17 and 18: Decision ModelBeneficialRemorse/cha
Page 19 and 20: Participants• Two hundred partici
Page 21 and 22: Analyses• EFA• Reliability esti
Page 23 and 24: Balkin, R. S., 201123
Page 25 and 26: Psychometric Qualities ofthe FRI•
Page 27: DescriptivesScale N M SD Role Chang
Page 31 and 32: Sample Profile 1Balkin, R. S., 2011
Page 33 and 34: Sample Profile 3Balkin, R. S., 2011
Page 35: QuestionsBalkin, R. S., 201135

The Forgiveness Reconciliation Inventory: A model for assessing ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?