21.08.2015 Views

Table of contents

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46[2] PROGRESS | sector response United Nations and PartnersMID YEAR REVIEW | Sudan work plan 2012Achievements as <strong>of</strong> 15 May 2012Among the vulnerable populations in Sudan, the protectionsector focused on people <strong>of</strong> South Sudanese origin living inSudan given the deadline for them to acquire appropriatedocumentation to regularize their status in Sudan ended on8 April. Despite limited and restricted access to Kosti WayStation, people <strong>of</strong> South Sudanese origin have been supportedthrough the identification <strong>of</strong> extremely vulnerable individuals,protection monitoring, female hygiene kit distribution andprotection/GBV trainings and family tracing and reunification(FTR) systems for unaccompanied minors (UAMs).In terms <strong>of</strong> child protection, the FTR system is fully operationalthroughout Sudan with a central database and hotline formissing and found children with both the Sudanese and SouthSudanese Government. In terms <strong>of</strong> GBV, there have beenactivities related to prevention and response to GBV incidents.The activities have involved IDPs, government <strong>of</strong>ficials, andmedia among others.In terms <strong>of</strong> child protection, the FTR system is fully operationalthroughout Sudan with a central database and hotline formissing and found children with both the Sudanese and SouthSudanese Government. In terms <strong>of</strong> GBV, there have beenactivities related to prevention and response to GBV incidents.The activities have involved IDPs, government <strong>of</strong>ficials, andmedia among others.There is also a lack <strong>of</strong> protection partners in Blue Nile. Therehave also been at times access restrictions in eastern Sudan,White Nile State (Kosti way station) and Khartoum State(departure points).Among other factors, bureaucratic procedures associated withtravel have caused delays and difficulties in terms <strong>of</strong> projectimplementation. In Darfur, the security situation and Governmentimposed movement restrictions hinders monitoring,especially in rural camps, requiring a review <strong>of</strong> monitoringexercises to include remote monitoring. Funding has alsobeen a challenge, and the slow disbursement <strong>of</strong> donor fundingfor the CHF has affected the implementation <strong>of</strong> plannedactivities.Meanwhile, the Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding (MoU) for theprotection <strong>of</strong> separated and unaccompanied children betweenSudan and South Sudan expires at the end <strong>of</strong> June 2012.Changes in TargetsNo changes in targets.Sector Project RevalidationProjects were re-validated based on a sector review <strong>of</strong> thecurrent situation . The percentage <strong>of</strong> ‘high priority’ projectsdecreased from 55.9% to 32.4%.Implementation challengesAccess restrictions and security concerns have limited aprotection response to vulnerable populations in many parts<strong>of</strong> Sudan, especially in South Kord<strong>of</strong>an and Blue Nile states.protection SECTOR FUNDING REQUIREMENTSLEGENDLIBYARevisedRed SeaFundedNORTHERNNILERED SEA$0.61 m$0.11 mCHADWESTDARFUR$14.56 m$1.91 mCENTRALAFRICANREPUBLICNORTH DARFUR$11.63 m$1.35 mSOUTH DARFUR$23.48 m$1.96 m$6.89 m$1.64 mKHARTOUM$0.49 m$0.00 mNORTH KORDOFANEL GEZIRA$0.10 m$0.02 mWHITESENNARNILE$0.40 m$2.80 m$0.07 m$0.99 mBLUE NILESOUTH KORDOFAN$3.69 m$3.74 m$0.87 m$1.23 m$1.31 m$0.50 mABYEIREPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDANKASSALA$1.38 m$0.39 mGEDAREF$0.89 m$0.12 mERITREAETHIOPIA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!