25.08.2015 Views

Communications

2008 Annual Report - Atlantic Pilotage Authority

2008 Annual Report - Atlantic Pilotage Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2008 Shipping Incidents<br />

During 2008, there were 5 shipping incidents<br />

reported by the Authority’s pilots. All incidents<br />

were minor in nature, and are described<br />

below:<br />

Type of Incident 2008 2007<br />

Contact with wharf 3 5<br />

Contact with port equipment 1 3<br />

Contact with lock 0 2<br />

Contact with ship 1 1<br />

Contact with sea bed 0 1<br />

Contact with buoy 0 0<br />

Year end total 5 11<br />

The Authority endeavours to provide a safe<br />

and efficient pilotage service in the Atlantic<br />

region. The total number of occurrences<br />

indicates 99.95%of the 9,541 pilotage<br />

assignments were incident free.<br />

Financial Self-Sufficiency<br />

The Pilotage Act requires that pilotage tariffs be<br />

fixed at a level that permits the Authority to<br />

operate on a self-sustaining financial basis, and<br />

that the tariffs set be fair and reasonable. To<br />

achieve self-sufficiency, tariff adjustments are<br />

made based on the financial and operational<br />

issues within each port, rather than overall<br />

tariff increases that impact all areas. The goal is<br />

to have each area become financially selfsufficient<br />

to eliminate crosssubsidization<br />

among ports. The<br />

Authority relies on projections<br />

of future traffic levels and<br />

the corresponding revenue<br />

and expenses to determine<br />

the financial health of the<br />

individual ports. All aspects<br />

of an area’s operation are<br />

monitored to determine whether<br />

cost cutting measures are more<br />

appropriate to achieve a positive result<br />

before tariff increases are considered.<br />

The Authority amended tariff charges for<br />

2008 in eleven compulsory pilotage areas: Saint<br />

John, NB, Restigouche, NB, Halifax, NS, Strait<br />

of Canso, NS, Bras d’Or, NS, Sydney, NS, St.<br />

John’s, NF, Placentia Bay, NF, Humber Arm, NF,<br />

99.95%<br />

of the 9,541<br />

pilotage assignments<br />

were incident free.<br />

Stephenville, NF and Bay of Exploits, NF.<br />

Included in the amendments was the<br />

implementation of a new pilot boat surcharge<br />

in the areas of Halifax, NS and Saint John, NB.<br />

All other tariff charges in the remaining<br />

compulsory and non-compulsory pilotage<br />

areas remained unchanged.<br />

In recent years there has been significant<br />

volatility in activity and revenue in some ports,<br />

particularly in Placentia Bay, St. John’s, Halifax,<br />

and Saint John. The increases in tariff were<br />

intended to allow the Authority to remain<br />

financially self-sufficient while providing the<br />

quality of service requested by the Authority’s<br />

clients.<br />

Fuel Expense Recovery Charge<br />

The Authority operates pilot boats in the ports<br />

of Halifax, NS and Sydney, NS, Saint John, NB,<br />

and Placentia Bay, NL. The unprecedented<br />

increase in fuel prices experienced during 2008<br />

resulted in fuel costs being as much as 66%<br />

over the budgeted price. This resulted in the<br />

total fuel costs for the year being more than<br />

$380 thousand over the budgeted amount.<br />

During the first half of 2008, during<br />

consultation meetings, the Authority’s<br />

customers expressed support for a fuel<br />

expense recovery charge that would allow the<br />

Authority to offset the significant increase in<br />

costs. The customers recognized the negative<br />

impact of fuel prices on the Authority, and<br />

indicated their support for a<br />

mechanism that reflected<br />

actual costs and that would<br />

be adjusted to reflect the<br />

volatility in prices. Due<br />

to the delay inherent in<br />

publishing new tariff<br />

amendments, and the fixed<br />

nature of the current tariff<br />

regulation structure, it was agreed<br />

that a fuel expense recovery charge could<br />

be implemented effective July 1, 2008, to<br />

remain in effect until the end of the year.<br />

The minimal fuel requirements for<br />

the port of Sydney did not make fuel cost<br />

a significant issue, so the Authority did<br />

not pursue a recovery charge for that port.<br />

However, in the port of Canso, NS, the pilot<br />

boat contractor requested a fuel surcharge on<br />

each pilot boat trip to offset rising costs. The<br />

contractor in this area has greater exposure to<br />

fuel increases than other contractors due to<br />

the geographical expanse of this compulsory<br />

pilotage area. The Authority agreed to use the<br />

same mechanism as agreed by its customers<br />

for the Canso area, with all proceeds of the<br />

charge flowing through to the contractor.<br />

The following table illustrates the<br />

revenue raised through the fuel expense<br />

recovery charge (in thousands of dollars):<br />

Fuel Recovery Percentage of<br />

Area Amount Area Revenue<br />

Halifax $ 71 1.65%<br />

Canso $ 77 2.88%<br />

Placentia Bay $ 82 1.92%<br />

Saint John $ 25 1.05%<br />

Total $ 255 1.46%<br />

The total amount raised of $255 thousand<br />

represents less than 1.5% of the Authority’s<br />

pilotage revenue for the year. Of this revenue,<br />

a total of $178 thousand was used to offset<br />

rising fuel prices for Authority owned pilot<br />

boats, while $77 thousand raised in Canso<br />

was paid to the pilot boat contractor.<br />

When considering its implementation,<br />

the Authority considered these charges to be<br />

a travel charges incurred by a pilot and thus<br />

covered by Section 22 of the Atlantic Pilotage<br />

Tariff Regulations, 1996. Upon review, the<br />

Office of the Auditor General has concluded<br />

that this characterization of the charges is not<br />

correct, and that these charges are not<br />

prescribed by regulation in accordance with<br />

the requirements of the Pilotage Act. Therefore,<br />

the Auditor General has qualified her Auditor’s<br />

Report accordingly. The Authority concurs<br />

with this finding by the Auditor General.<br />

Technology<br />

Investment in technology is important to<br />

the Authority in order to satisfy its mandate.<br />

Technology is used to increase productivity,<br />

improve the quality of service, and assure safe<br />

pilotage. A technology committee is in place<br />

to examine possible uses of technology for<br />

the Authority. The committee consists of<br />

representatives of both management and pilots.<br />

ATLANTIC PILOTAGE AUTHORTY Annual Report 2008 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!