Communications
2008 Annual Report - Atlantic Pilotage Authority
2008 Annual Report - Atlantic Pilotage Authority
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2008 Shipping Incidents<br />
During 2008, there were 5 shipping incidents<br />
reported by the Authority’s pilots. All incidents<br />
were minor in nature, and are described<br />
below:<br />
Type of Incident 2008 2007<br />
Contact with wharf 3 5<br />
Contact with port equipment 1 3<br />
Contact with lock 0 2<br />
Contact with ship 1 1<br />
Contact with sea bed 0 1<br />
Contact with buoy 0 0<br />
Year end total 5 11<br />
The Authority endeavours to provide a safe<br />
and efficient pilotage service in the Atlantic<br />
region. The total number of occurrences<br />
indicates 99.95%of the 9,541 pilotage<br />
assignments were incident free.<br />
Financial Self-Sufficiency<br />
The Pilotage Act requires that pilotage tariffs be<br />
fixed at a level that permits the Authority to<br />
operate on a self-sustaining financial basis, and<br />
that the tariffs set be fair and reasonable. To<br />
achieve self-sufficiency, tariff adjustments are<br />
made based on the financial and operational<br />
issues within each port, rather than overall<br />
tariff increases that impact all areas. The goal is<br />
to have each area become financially selfsufficient<br />
to eliminate crosssubsidization<br />
among ports. The<br />
Authority relies on projections<br />
of future traffic levels and<br />
the corresponding revenue<br />
and expenses to determine<br />
the financial health of the<br />
individual ports. All aspects<br />
of an area’s operation are<br />
monitored to determine whether<br />
cost cutting measures are more<br />
appropriate to achieve a positive result<br />
before tariff increases are considered.<br />
The Authority amended tariff charges for<br />
2008 in eleven compulsory pilotage areas: Saint<br />
John, NB, Restigouche, NB, Halifax, NS, Strait<br />
of Canso, NS, Bras d’Or, NS, Sydney, NS, St.<br />
John’s, NF, Placentia Bay, NF, Humber Arm, NF,<br />
99.95%<br />
of the 9,541<br />
pilotage assignments<br />
were incident free.<br />
Stephenville, NF and Bay of Exploits, NF.<br />
Included in the amendments was the<br />
implementation of a new pilot boat surcharge<br />
in the areas of Halifax, NS and Saint John, NB.<br />
All other tariff charges in the remaining<br />
compulsory and non-compulsory pilotage<br />
areas remained unchanged.<br />
In recent years there has been significant<br />
volatility in activity and revenue in some ports,<br />
particularly in Placentia Bay, St. John’s, Halifax,<br />
and Saint John. The increases in tariff were<br />
intended to allow the Authority to remain<br />
financially self-sufficient while providing the<br />
quality of service requested by the Authority’s<br />
clients.<br />
Fuel Expense Recovery Charge<br />
The Authority operates pilot boats in the ports<br />
of Halifax, NS and Sydney, NS, Saint John, NB,<br />
and Placentia Bay, NL. The unprecedented<br />
increase in fuel prices experienced during 2008<br />
resulted in fuel costs being as much as 66%<br />
over the budgeted price. This resulted in the<br />
total fuel costs for the year being more than<br />
$380 thousand over the budgeted amount.<br />
During the first half of 2008, during<br />
consultation meetings, the Authority’s<br />
customers expressed support for a fuel<br />
expense recovery charge that would allow the<br />
Authority to offset the significant increase in<br />
costs. The customers recognized the negative<br />
impact of fuel prices on the Authority, and<br />
indicated their support for a<br />
mechanism that reflected<br />
actual costs and that would<br />
be adjusted to reflect the<br />
volatility in prices. Due<br />
to the delay inherent in<br />
publishing new tariff<br />
amendments, and the fixed<br />
nature of the current tariff<br />
regulation structure, it was agreed<br />
that a fuel expense recovery charge could<br />
be implemented effective July 1, 2008, to<br />
remain in effect until the end of the year.<br />
The minimal fuel requirements for<br />
the port of Sydney did not make fuel cost<br />
a significant issue, so the Authority did<br />
not pursue a recovery charge for that port.<br />
However, in the port of Canso, NS, the pilot<br />
boat contractor requested a fuel surcharge on<br />
each pilot boat trip to offset rising costs. The<br />
contractor in this area has greater exposure to<br />
fuel increases than other contractors due to<br />
the geographical expanse of this compulsory<br />
pilotage area. The Authority agreed to use the<br />
same mechanism as agreed by its customers<br />
for the Canso area, with all proceeds of the<br />
charge flowing through to the contractor.<br />
The following table illustrates the<br />
revenue raised through the fuel expense<br />
recovery charge (in thousands of dollars):<br />
Fuel Recovery Percentage of<br />
Area Amount Area Revenue<br />
Halifax $ 71 1.65%<br />
Canso $ 77 2.88%<br />
Placentia Bay $ 82 1.92%<br />
Saint John $ 25 1.05%<br />
Total $ 255 1.46%<br />
The total amount raised of $255 thousand<br />
represents less than 1.5% of the Authority’s<br />
pilotage revenue for the year. Of this revenue,<br />
a total of $178 thousand was used to offset<br />
rising fuel prices for Authority owned pilot<br />
boats, while $77 thousand raised in Canso<br />
was paid to the pilot boat contractor.<br />
When considering its implementation,<br />
the Authority considered these charges to be<br />
a travel charges incurred by a pilot and thus<br />
covered by Section 22 of the Atlantic Pilotage<br />
Tariff Regulations, 1996. Upon review, the<br />
Office of the Auditor General has concluded<br />
that this characterization of the charges is not<br />
correct, and that these charges are not<br />
prescribed by regulation in accordance with<br />
the requirements of the Pilotage Act. Therefore,<br />
the Auditor General has qualified her Auditor’s<br />
Report accordingly. The Authority concurs<br />
with this finding by the Auditor General.<br />
Technology<br />
Investment in technology is important to<br />
the Authority in order to satisfy its mandate.<br />
Technology is used to increase productivity,<br />
improve the quality of service, and assure safe<br />
pilotage. A technology committee is in place<br />
to examine possible uses of technology for<br />
the Authority. The committee consists of<br />
representatives of both management and pilots.<br />
ATLANTIC PILOTAGE AUTHORTY Annual Report 2008 5