Annual Program Evaluation for State Compensatory Education (SCE)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4 State Compensatory Education 6/27/12 7. Review the strategies and action steps written in the CIP with the campus staff 8. Use the findings and recommendations to identify the parts of the schoolwide plan that have been/not been implemented effectively, or not at all 9. Solicit the input of all stakeholders in identifying more effective strategies to achieve the identified goals of students in need 10. Identify any additional training that is needed to improve implementation 11. Determine if additional resources are needed to implement the revised improvement plan and, if so, how they will be obtained 12. Re-establish responsibilities and timelines for implementing the revised plan 13. Communicate to all stakeholders what has been incorporated into the revised plan to meet the needs of at risk students 14. Review the implementation design that was used and make changes as appropriate to reflect plan modifications to meet the needs of at risk students in preparation for the following year’s evaluation 15. Other, specify Column 4: List appropriate compensatory, intensive or accelerated instructional services for students at risk of dropping out, and not perform at grade level at the conclusion of the next regular school term. Choose a response (s) below and write the letter (s) in the column on the chart. A. Specialized reading or mathematics programs and /or materials B. Specialized software C. Additional staff and equipment D. Tutorials E. Class-size reduction F. Computer-assisted instruction G. Specialized staff development to train personnel who are working with students at risk of dropping out of school H. TAKS/STARR remediation I. Individualized instruction J. Extended day sessions for prekindergarten K. Accelerated instruction L. Extended day, week, or year programs M. Field trips N. Other, specify Column 5: List the amount of funds expended to implement the strategy or activity. If the funds are lumped together, give your best estimate for dollars expended for the strategy or activity. If funds are specifically designated for the strategy or activity, list that amount in the column.
5 State Compensatory Education 6/27/12 Column 6: Make recommendations for modifying, discontinuing, or maintaining the strategy or activity. Choose a response (s) below and write the letter (s) in the column on the chart. A. Modify B. Discontinue C. Maintain D. Other, specify Column 7: Comprehensive evaluation addresses the strengths and weaknesses of the program. Choose a response (s) below and write the number (s) in the column on the chart. 1. Funding was adequate 2. Funding was inadequate 3. Student performance improved 4. Student performance did not improve 5. Teacher performance improved 6. Teacher performance did not improve 7. Stakeholders participated 8. Stakeholders did not participate 9. Professional development and training was effective 10. Professional development and training was ineffective 11. Strategy, initiative and/or program met the students’ needs 12. Strategy, initiative, and/or program did not meet the students’ needs 13. Timing of the intervention or implementation used was appropriate 14. Timing of the intervention or implementation used was inappropriate 15. Amount of time given for the intervention or implementation was sufficient 16. Amount of time given for the intervention or implementation was insufficient 17. Other, specify
Page 1 and 2: 1 SCE 6/27/12 San Antonio Independe
Page 3: 3 State Compensatory Education 6/27

Annual Program Evaluation for State Compensatory Education (SCE)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?