29.08.2015 Views

FEMINIST THOUGHT

the full book here - Radical Feminisms :: An EXCO Reading ...

the full book here - Radical Feminisms :: An EXCO Reading ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Eighteenth-Century Thought: Equal Education 13<br />

equality of opportunity, which would undoubtedly require and lead to<br />

both.” 10 Very few, if any, contemporary liberal feminists favor the elimination<br />

of government-funded safety nets for society’s most vulnerable members.<br />

Since it is nearly impossible to discuss all liberal feminist thinkers, movements,<br />

and organizations in a single book, I have decided to focus only on<br />

Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor (Mill), the woman’s<br />

suffrage movement in the United States, Betty Friedan, and the National<br />

Organization for Women. My aim is to construct a convincing argument<br />

that, for all its shortcomings, the overall goal of liberal feminism is the worthy<br />

one of creating “a just and compassionate society in which freedom<br />

flourishes.” 11 Only in such a society can women and men thrive equally.<br />

Eighteenth-Century Thought:<br />

Equal Education<br />

Mary Wollstonecraft wrote at a time (1759–1799) when the economic and<br />

social position of European women was in decline. Up until the eighteenth<br />

century, productive work (work that generated an income from which a family<br />

could live) had been done in and around the family home by women as<br />

well as men. But then the forces of industrial capitalism began to draw labor<br />

out of the private home and into the public workplace. At first, this industrialization<br />

moved slowly and unevenly, making its strongest impact on married,<br />

bourgeois women. These women were the first to find themselves left at home<br />

with little productive work to do. Married to relatively wealthy professional<br />

and entrepreneurial men, these women had no incentive to work outside the<br />

home or, if they had several servants, even inside it. 12<br />

In reading Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, 13 we see<br />

how affluence worked against these eighteenth-century, married, bourgeois<br />

women. Wollstonecraft compared such “privileged” women (whom she<br />

hoped to inspire to a fully human mode of existence) to members of “the<br />

feathered race,” birds that are confined to cages and that have nothing to do<br />

but preen themselves and “stalk with mock majesty from perch to perch.” 14<br />

Middle-class ladies were, in Wollstonecraft’s estimation, “kept” women who<br />

sacrificed health, liberty, and virtue for whatever prestige, pleasure, and<br />

power their husbands could provide. Because these women were not allowed<br />

to exercise outdoors lest they tan their lily-white skin, they lacked healthy<br />

bodies. Because they were not permitted to make their own decisions, they<br />

lacked liberty. And because they were discouraged from developing their<br />

powers of reason—given that a great premium was placed on indulging self<br />

and gratifying others, especially men and children—they lacked virtue.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!