Pale Fire

Life Everlasting — based on a misprint!
I mused as I drove homeward: take the hint,
And stop investigating my abyss?
But all at once it dawned on me that this
Was the real point, the contrapuntal theme;
Just this: not text, but texture; not the dream
But topsy-turvical coincidence,
810 Not flimsy nonsense, but a web of sense.
(PF 62-63)
Brian Boyd and others have tended to consider this passage the Poem’s climax, but the
possible role of misprints in the novel has been neglected, and later editions of Pale Fire have
corrected many of them. However, in preparation for the publication of The Annotated Lolita,
Alfred Appel, Jr., asked Nabokov about an apparent mistake in Pale Fire in which the title of
Finnegans Wake appears with an “i” for the “e” in “Finnegans,” and also with a possessive
apostrophe, thus apparently correcting Joyce’s obviously intentional error while throwing in a
new one for good measure. 2 But Nabokov would have been familiar with Stephen’s quip in
Ulysses: “A man of genius makes no mistakes. His errors are volitional and are the portals of
discovery” (243). So his response to Appel is tantalizing: “You say you don’t understand the
mistakes of tricksters but they would not be tricksters if they did not profit by their own tricky
mistakes.” 3 Nabokov thus seems to be suggesting that just as the title of Finnegans Wake
functions to “trick” readers into catching a mistake that really isn’t one (a subject brilliantly
2 This passage appears in the note to line 12 in the Commentary: “Of course, it would have been unseemly
for a monarch to appear in the robes of learning at a university lectern and present to rosy youths
Finnigan’s Wake as a monstrous extension of Angus Mac-Diarmid’s “incoherent transactions” and of
Southey’s Lingo-Grande (“Dear Stumparumper,” etc.)” (PF 76) Since this intentional error is only the
second note in the Commentary, it may be that Nabokov chose to place a major thematic clue here, as he
often does, precisely because of its high visibility.
3 The letter from Nabokov to Appel is filed at the Berg Collection at the New York Public Library, dated
April 3, 1967. In spite of Nabokov’s cryptic “trickiness” response, Appel refers to the misspelling of
Finnegans Wake in Pale Fire in a note in The Annotated Lolita, but does not note that Nabokov may have
meant anything special by it. Instead, he just flags the irregularity in his quotation of Pale Fire so it won’t
look like his own mistake: “…present to rosy youths Finnigan’s [sic— A.A.] Wake…” (413).
2