06.09.2015 Views

we

73 Amateur Radio Today - Free and Open Source Software

73 Amateur Radio Today - Free and Open Source Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LETTERS<br />

Keith Littlejohn vi s 73 BBS You told<br />

us a while back that kids should be able<br />

to learn the code aiao wpm as easy as<br />

learningSwpm.<br />

We (Kyla N7JVA and I) have live<br />

kids, and the three big ones (B. 7, and<br />

5) are getting interested in ham radio<br />

and want HF privileges. So where are<br />

the 20 wpm tapes lor beginners?<br />

This isn't a silly comment! All of the<br />

high-speed code tapes are for upgrading<br />

from slo<strong>we</strong>r speeds, not for staning<br />

from scratch .<br />

20 wpm is 20 wpm, so what would be<br />

different abouta tape for beginners?<br />

As I've writ/en in my editorials every<br />

few years, you sit down with a 20 wpm<br />

tape and start listening. II's a blur.<br />

right? Not quite. 1/ you start listening,<br />

you'll hear an E when il goes by. Write<br />

down E every time you hear il. Then<br />

start listening for T, and write down<br />

both E and T as they go by. Next start<br />

listening for I. and so on Ihrough Ihe<br />

alphabet. It"s a cinch. In a tew hours,<br />

you're copying all of the letters, numbers,<br />

and punctuation _. .and al 20<br />

wpm. Beats the hell out of trying to<br />

gradually speed up . . .. Wayne<br />

Jeffrey Viola, Jackson NJ I am a<br />

new subscriber 10 73 Magazine, and a<br />

wanna-be ham for about 25 years<br />

(I'm 36). Probably would have become<br />

one as a youngster, but neither my tather<br />

nor anyone else would take time<br />

with a to-year-ole who loved 10 take<br />

apart walkie-talkies, radios, or any other<br />

electronic gadget. Over the past two<br />

years, I bought the ARRL Handbook<br />

and every old OST I could get my<br />

hands on, and have been leaching myself<br />

radio electrcrucs. Was gonna go<br />

for my Novice (old ::;tyle) CW ticket. but<br />

something held me back . . . perhaps it<br />

was the coma I slipped into listening to<br />

the local ham club <strong>we</strong>ekly rag-chew on<br />

2 meters.<br />

When I heard the FCC was going to<br />

issue no-cede tickets, • jumped for joy!<br />

After all, I'm currently employed by a<br />

major stock brokerage house as AVP<br />

of their commun ications dept Talk<br />

about technolog y- <strong>we</strong>'ve been sending<br />

data via modems at 9.600 bps lor a<br />

decade. t have one 18GHz and 23 GHz<br />

microwave rad ios (digita!!) linking our<br />

headquarters. The 23 GHz radio alone<br />

gives me 28channels, each 1.544 MHz<br />

wide! When the big earthquake hit California<br />

two years ago, <strong>we</strong> talked to our<br />

people on cellular radiophones. I' m<br />

looking into hooking up our SUN workstations<br />

on RF or infrared LAN S. And<br />

"you" wanted me to learn code? Give<br />

me a taptop PC hooked to microwave<br />

spread-spectrum reoot<br />

The point of my letter is this, ho<strong>we</strong>ver:<br />

For alilhe editorial lip service, OST,<br />

73 (yes, 73), and other publications<br />

have given to the new no-code ticket,<br />

8 73 Amateur Radio Today . November, 199 1<br />

Number 3 on yo ur Feedback card<br />

From the Hamshack<br />

where are the articles for the potential<br />

no-code ham? Other than the oneshot,<br />

pat-on-the-back short articles lasl<br />

spring, • have not seen one articie. II a<br />

computer literate kid picked up Ihis issue<br />

of 73, would he know he could geta<br />

ham ticket? • called the local ham club<br />

and asked about it, and got less inlo<br />

from them than from a reluctant wil·<br />

ness at a Mafia trial ... .<br />

I personally believe that everyone is<br />

afraid Ihat 50 MHz + will become CBland.<br />

Where are, at least, Ihe UHF erncles?<br />

Why not get elecfromcs/nam advertisers<br />

10 put out a special no-code<br />

one-time magazine? Charge a few<br />

bucks and put it on Ihe racks for one<br />

year? And lei us know where to sign up<br />

to take the no-code1?<br />

Jeffrey, <strong>we</strong>'ve pUblishea quite a few<br />

VHF and UHF articles recently. Look<br />

for future issues which will show you<br />

ways 10 enter the exciting world of<br />

VHF/UHF without breaking the bank.<br />

By the way, the magazine you'd like to<br />

see is a reality. . . it'scal/eaRadio Fun ,<br />

and is now into it's third issue!. . .. Bill<br />

WBBELK<br />

Richard Bovee KF8NT, Tol edo OH It<br />

has been said that along with the influx<br />

of the new no-code Technician class<br />

amateurs will come new technology.<br />

Along wilh Ihat influx will co me new<br />

amateur organizations, each striving to<br />

be the best they can be, serve their<br />

communily and better the communications<br />

in their area. This, of course, will<br />

mean more repeaters. Herein lies the<br />

problem: repealer coordination. Good<br />

luck! This is exactly the situation <strong>we</strong><br />

have found ourselves in. We cannot<br />

seem 10 lind a 2 meter frequency that<br />

can be coordinated. Paging through<br />

the repealer directory, • find in some<br />

instances, and not to my amazement,<br />

more than one repeater per band per<br />

individual/club.<br />

Do you suppose the lime is near<br />

when the FCC should rest ruct ure the<br />

assignment of repeater frequencies<br />

and aliow only one frequency pair per<br />

band per individual/club?<br />

Jeffrey C. Montgomery WB4WX D,<br />

Palestine TX Congratulations on having<br />

a fine magazine that attempts to tell<br />

it like it is in the amateur community .<br />

Mr. Green's colu mns make life triteresting,<br />

to say the least, and is the firs t<br />

thing turned to every month. BUT, I<br />

have to disagree w ith a statemen t<br />

made rega rding Morse code as it pertained<br />

to emergency communications.<br />

Mr. Green slated thai rewas not aware<br />

of an emergency situation where code<br />

was used in lieu of voice or other mod·<br />

es because of their inability 10 get<br />

through atmospheric conditions. I was<br />

personally involved in a situation that<br />

proved said value olthe code 10 do just<br />

that.<br />

On November 15, 1987, East Texas<br />

was hit by several tornados. Our town<br />

was particularly hard hit, and lost most<br />

of its local and all of its long-distance<br />

telephone service. The local ham communily<br />

swung tntc action and set up<br />

command posts throughout the city.<br />

Co nnection was made to the evening<br />

NTs traffic net on 75m using SSB as<br />

the primary mode. Because of the static<br />

crashes on the air, voice operation<br />

was unintelligible. The operators on<br />

both ends switched to CW, and atthough<br />

difficult to copy, the traffic did<br />

get through Ihat night. The next morning<br />

when conditions improved, the tratuc<br />

was handled on 40m SSB. In all,<br />

over 400 pieces of traffic <strong>we</strong>re handled<br />

Irom as far away as Australia.'roe coce<br />

proved essential to our operation Ihal<br />

first nig ht. We used SSB and packet for<br />

the majority of the remaining Health<br />

and Weifare traffic.<br />

• am an Extra class ham who has<br />

paid his dues to the 20 wpm deity, but I<br />

also support Ihe eococe Technician<br />

for those who desire to go that route.<br />

I've seen some fine, new Techs who<br />

are valuable to Ihe service. But . think<br />

the reported death of CW is premature.<br />

Let's not write off a mode of communication<br />

that has proved nsen 01 great<br />

value over the years.<br />

Dar ren Leno W Dfl EWJ<br />

Now tha i<br />

you've piqued my interest in microwaves<br />

and all the other things I<br />

haven'ttried yet, I'd really enjoy seeing<br />

more articles on the subject. Take us<br />

beyond 10 GHz, and show us where to<br />

go to leach ourselves more.<br />

I would also like to see an article thai<br />

describes the mysterious modes that<br />

<strong>we</strong> hea r about but never quite onderstand,<br />

li ke pulse modulation and<br />

spread spectrum. I thin k many of us<br />

don't understand what <strong>we</strong> are even allo<strong>we</strong>d<br />

to do on these high frequencies,<br />

let alone how to do it,<br />

Thanks to your badgering, I've become<br />

very interested in trying modes<br />

that are new to me. I'm saving to buy<br />

test-scan TV equipment, and recently<br />

purchased an MFJ digital th ingamajig·<br />

gy so I can learn about ancient modes<br />

like AMTOR, RTTY, packet, and stuff . t<br />

know I'm 10- 30 years behind the<br />

times, but better lale Ihan never. Moon<br />

bounce holds a big fascination for me,<br />

and I've bee n listening to their nets on<br />

20 meters.<br />

Hey, why don't <strong>we</strong> put a 24 GHz repeater<br />

on the moon?<br />

As for your plea to get " good " hams<br />

on 20 meters, I <strong>we</strong>nt and bought an HF<br />

rig just for you. • absolutely cannot believe<br />

what . hear on 14.312 (or thereabouts)<br />

. It makes you want to do something,<br />

like tell those guys off. But then,<br />

<strong>we</strong> become part of the problem. So<br />

what is the solution? If hams are going<br />

to be self-policing, let's gi ve ha ms<br />

some police po<strong>we</strong>r,<br />

Darren's Big Sofution to the 20 Meter<br />

Fiasco: Any ham who has not incurred<br />

a viOlation may become a "Band Monitor"<br />

after receiving approval by a full<br />

vote 01the VEC organizations. If there<br />

is any objection by any VEC, that person<br />

will not be eligible to become a<br />

Band Monitor, but may reapply aller<br />

one year. There will be no less than 100<br />

Band Monitors and no more than 200.<br />

The specific cueuecauons for becoming<br />

a Band Monitor woul d be declded<br />

later, but It us method would prevent<br />

any one group from monopolizing<br />

the policing lunction. Band Monitors<br />

are responsible lor monitoring th e<br />

bands and issuing "notices" for simple<br />

violat ions. If a ham rs e frequent offender,<br />

or commits extremely disruptive actions,<br />

the Band Monitor complaint is<br />

referred to the Hearings Board with the<br />

evidence (tape recording).<br />

The Hearings Board is made up of<br />

two hams appointed by each VEC.<br />

These hams would hear complaints<br />

brought by Band Monitors and would<br />

have the authority to dish out license<br />

suspensions 01 up to one year, Revocation<br />

would be a penalty that only the<br />

FCC, on the recommendation of the<br />

Hearings Board, would be able to implement.<br />

I think hams need to give themselves<br />

some leetl'l, Wayne, The FCC already<br />

makes a provision to listen to the advice<br />

01 frequency coordinators in disputes<br />

arising from repeater interference<br />

cases. Why not give the VECs a<br />

lillie more authority to regu late the<br />

hams Ihay are licensing?<br />

Howard Pomeroy KA1 ZCY. Suffield<br />

CT One of the reasons I'm writin g is to<br />

inform you that I finally passed my<br />

Novice CW and theory. and no w,<br />

Wayne, I am a ham. My callsign is<br />

KA1ZCY, and I am so proud of it. My<br />

only regrel is that my dear Mom and<br />

Dad <strong>we</strong>ren 't here to share my excitement<br />

with me .<br />

73is a fine journal, my only comment<br />

is I wish the "OX" column <strong>we</strong>re a bit<br />

larger.<br />

G, Eric Fergu son KA6USJ, Concord<br />

CA OK. You' ve finally done it!! I am<br />

now motivated to upgrade from Novice<br />

to Tech. I' m your Bth place winner in<br />

the Ham-it-Up S<strong>we</strong>epsta kes, Up till<br />

now, I have had man y excuses to not<br />

upgrade. Lack of money, no place lor<br />

an antenna, can't remember code,<br />

etc., <strong>we</strong>i!, you get the idea. Even my<br />

Commodore 64 was given to me, and<br />

now it's an orphan , I have never been<br />

on the air yet, and have had my license<br />

lor around 10 years. I admit I was hoping<br />

to win an HF rig, but • think I' m<br />

really going to enjoy the 2m/440 rig.<br />

THANKS!I<br />

Fran KG7NZ via 73 BBS • enjoy your<br />

magazlne immensely. Never stop griping<br />

and grousing, it encourages the<br />

res! of us to consider other ideas and<br />

problems.l also loo k torwaro to logging<br />

some time on your BSS now that it is up<br />

and running .<br />

The new BaS has been up and running<br />

full·lime since the end of July. Everyone<br />

is <strong>we</strong>lcome to browse Ihrough the<br />

ever-growing liat of useful programs<br />

you can download. We now have over<br />

1000 users! Feel free to give it a call at<br />

(603) 525-4438.. . . Bill WB8ELK

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!