we
73 Amateur Radio Today - Free and Open Source Software
73 Amateur Radio Today - Free and Open Source Software
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LETTERS<br />
Keith Littlejohn vi s 73 BBS You told<br />
us a while back that kids should be able<br />
to learn the code aiao wpm as easy as<br />
learningSwpm.<br />
We (Kyla N7JVA and I) have live<br />
kids, and the three big ones (B. 7, and<br />
5) are getting interested in ham radio<br />
and want HF privileges. So where are<br />
the 20 wpm tapes lor beginners?<br />
This isn't a silly comment! All of the<br />
high-speed code tapes are for upgrading<br />
from slo<strong>we</strong>r speeds, not for staning<br />
from scratch .<br />
20 wpm is 20 wpm, so what would be<br />
different abouta tape for beginners?<br />
As I've writ/en in my editorials every<br />
few years, you sit down with a 20 wpm<br />
tape and start listening. II's a blur.<br />
right? Not quite. 1/ you start listening,<br />
you'll hear an E when il goes by. Write<br />
down E every time you hear il. Then<br />
start listening for T, and write down<br />
both E and T as they go by. Next start<br />
listening for I. and so on Ihrough Ihe<br />
alphabet. It"s a cinch. In a tew hours,<br />
you're copying all of the letters, numbers,<br />
and punctuation _. .and al 20<br />
wpm. Beats the hell out of trying to<br />
gradually speed up . . .. Wayne<br />
Jeffrey Viola, Jackson NJ I am a<br />
new subscriber 10 73 Magazine, and a<br />
wanna-be ham for about 25 years<br />
(I'm 36). Probably would have become<br />
one as a youngster, but neither my tather<br />
nor anyone else would take time<br />
with a to-year-ole who loved 10 take<br />
apart walkie-talkies, radios, or any other<br />
electronic gadget. Over the past two<br />
years, I bought the ARRL Handbook<br />
and every old OST I could get my<br />
hands on, and have been leaching myself<br />
radio electrcrucs. Was gonna go<br />
for my Novice (old ::;tyle) CW ticket. but<br />
something held me back . . . perhaps it<br />
was the coma I slipped into listening to<br />
the local ham club <strong>we</strong>ekly rag-chew on<br />
2 meters.<br />
When I heard the FCC was going to<br />
issue no-cede tickets, • jumped for joy!<br />
After all, I'm currently employed by a<br />
major stock brokerage house as AVP<br />
of their commun ications dept Talk<br />
about technolog y- <strong>we</strong>'ve been sending<br />
data via modems at 9.600 bps lor a<br />
decade. t have one 18GHz and 23 GHz<br />
microwave rad ios (digita!!) linking our<br />
headquarters. The 23 GHz radio alone<br />
gives me 28channels, each 1.544 MHz<br />
wide! When the big earthquake hit California<br />
two years ago, <strong>we</strong> talked to our<br />
people on cellular radiophones. I' m<br />
looking into hooking up our SUN workstations<br />
on RF or infrared LAN S. And<br />
"you" wanted me to learn code? Give<br />
me a taptop PC hooked to microwave<br />
spread-spectrum reoot<br />
The point of my letter is this, ho<strong>we</strong>ver:<br />
For alilhe editorial lip service, OST,<br />
73 (yes, 73), and other publications<br />
have given to the new no-code ticket,<br />
8 73 Amateur Radio Today . November, 199 1<br />
Number 3 on yo ur Feedback card<br />
From the Hamshack<br />
where are the articles for the potential<br />
no-code ham? Other than the oneshot,<br />
pat-on-the-back short articles lasl<br />
spring, • have not seen one articie. II a<br />
computer literate kid picked up Ihis issue<br />
of 73, would he know he could geta<br />
ham ticket? • called the local ham club<br />
and asked about it, and got less inlo<br />
from them than from a reluctant wil·<br />
ness at a Mafia trial ... .<br />
I personally believe that everyone is<br />
afraid Ihat 50 MHz + will become CBland.<br />
Where are, at least, Ihe UHF erncles?<br />
Why not get elecfromcs/nam advertisers<br />
10 put out a special no-code<br />
one-time magazine? Charge a few<br />
bucks and put it on Ihe racks for one<br />
year? And lei us know where to sign up<br />
to take the no-code1?<br />
Jeffrey, <strong>we</strong>'ve pUblishea quite a few<br />
VHF and UHF articles recently. Look<br />
for future issues which will show you<br />
ways 10 enter the exciting world of<br />
VHF/UHF without breaking the bank.<br />
By the way, the magazine you'd like to<br />
see is a reality. . . it'scal/eaRadio Fun ,<br />
and is now into it's third issue!. . .. Bill<br />
WBBELK<br />
Richard Bovee KF8NT, Tol edo OH It<br />
has been said that along with the influx<br />
of the new no-code Technician class<br />
amateurs will come new technology.<br />
Along wilh Ihat influx will co me new<br />
amateur organizations, each striving to<br />
be the best they can be, serve their<br />
communily and better the communications<br />
in their area. This, of course, will<br />
mean more repeaters. Herein lies the<br />
problem: repealer coordination. Good<br />
luck! This is exactly the situation <strong>we</strong><br />
have found ourselves in. We cannot<br />
seem 10 lind a 2 meter frequency that<br />
can be coordinated. Paging through<br />
the repealer directory, • find in some<br />
instances, and not to my amazement,<br />
more than one repeater per band per<br />
individual/club.<br />
Do you suppose the lime is near<br />
when the FCC should rest ruct ure the<br />
assignment of repeater frequencies<br />
and aliow only one frequency pair per<br />
band per individual/club?<br />
Jeffrey C. Montgomery WB4WX D,<br />
Palestine TX Congratulations on having<br />
a fine magazine that attempts to tell<br />
it like it is in the amateur community .<br />
Mr. Green's colu mns make life triteresting,<br />
to say the least, and is the firs t<br />
thing turned to every month. BUT, I<br />
have to disagree w ith a statemen t<br />
made rega rding Morse code as it pertained<br />
to emergency communications.<br />
Mr. Green slated thai rewas not aware<br />
of an emergency situation where code<br />
was used in lieu of voice or other mod·<br />
es because of their inability 10 get<br />
through atmospheric conditions. I was<br />
personally involved in a situation that<br />
proved said value olthe code 10 do just<br />
that.<br />
On November 15, 1987, East Texas<br />
was hit by several tornados. Our town<br />
was particularly hard hit, and lost most<br />
of its local and all of its long-distance<br />
telephone service. The local ham communily<br />
swung tntc action and set up<br />
command posts throughout the city.<br />
Co nnection was made to the evening<br />
NTs traffic net on 75m using SSB as<br />
the primary mode. Because of the static<br />
crashes on the air, voice operation<br />
was unintelligible. The operators on<br />
both ends switched to CW, and atthough<br />
difficult to copy, the traffic did<br />
get through Ihat night. The next morning<br />
when conditions improved, the tratuc<br />
was handled on 40m SSB. In all,<br />
over 400 pieces of traffic <strong>we</strong>re handled<br />
Irom as far away as Australia.'roe coce<br />
proved essential to our operation Ihal<br />
first nig ht. We used SSB and packet for<br />
the majority of the remaining Health<br />
and Weifare traffic.<br />
• am an Extra class ham who has<br />
paid his dues to the 20 wpm deity, but I<br />
also support Ihe eococe Technician<br />
for those who desire to go that route.<br />
I've seen some fine, new Techs who<br />
are valuable to Ihe service. But . think<br />
the reported death of CW is premature.<br />
Let's not write off a mode of communication<br />
that has proved nsen 01 great<br />
value over the years.<br />
Dar ren Leno W Dfl EWJ<br />
Now tha i<br />
you've piqued my interest in microwaves<br />
and all the other things I<br />
haven'ttried yet, I'd really enjoy seeing<br />
more articles on the subject. Take us<br />
beyond 10 GHz, and show us where to<br />
go to leach ourselves more.<br />
I would also like to see an article thai<br />
describes the mysterious modes that<br />
<strong>we</strong> hea r about but never quite onderstand,<br />
li ke pulse modulation and<br />
spread spectrum. I thin k many of us<br />
don't understand what <strong>we</strong> are even allo<strong>we</strong>d<br />
to do on these high frequencies,<br />
let alone how to do it,<br />
Thanks to your badgering, I've become<br />
very interested in trying modes<br />
that are new to me. I'm saving to buy<br />
test-scan TV equipment, and recently<br />
purchased an MFJ digital th ingamajig·<br />
gy so I can learn about ancient modes<br />
like AMTOR, RTTY, packet, and stuff . t<br />
know I'm 10- 30 years behind the<br />
times, but better lale Ihan never. Moon<br />
bounce holds a big fascination for me,<br />
and I've bee n listening to their nets on<br />
20 meters.<br />
Hey, why don't <strong>we</strong> put a 24 GHz repeater<br />
on the moon?<br />
As for your plea to get " good " hams<br />
on 20 meters, I <strong>we</strong>nt and bought an HF<br />
rig just for you. • absolutely cannot believe<br />
what . hear on 14.312 (or thereabouts)<br />
. It makes you want to do something,<br />
like tell those guys off. But then,<br />
<strong>we</strong> become part of the problem. So<br />
what is the solution? If hams are going<br />
to be self-policing, let's gi ve ha ms<br />
some police po<strong>we</strong>r,<br />
Darren's Big Sofution to the 20 Meter<br />
Fiasco: Any ham who has not incurred<br />
a viOlation may become a "Band Monitor"<br />
after receiving approval by a full<br />
vote 01the VEC organizations. If there<br />
is any objection by any VEC, that person<br />
will not be eligible to become a<br />
Band Monitor, but may reapply aller<br />
one year. There will be no less than 100<br />
Band Monitors and no more than 200.<br />
The specific cueuecauons for becoming<br />
a Band Monitor woul d be declded<br />
later, but It us method would prevent<br />
any one group from monopolizing<br />
the policing lunction. Band Monitors<br />
are responsible lor monitoring th e<br />
bands and issuing "notices" for simple<br />
violat ions. If a ham rs e frequent offender,<br />
or commits extremely disruptive actions,<br />
the Band Monitor complaint is<br />
referred to the Hearings Board with the<br />
evidence (tape recording).<br />
The Hearings Board is made up of<br />
two hams appointed by each VEC.<br />
These hams would hear complaints<br />
brought by Band Monitors and would<br />
have the authority to dish out license<br />
suspensions 01 up to one year, Revocation<br />
would be a penalty that only the<br />
FCC, on the recommendation of the<br />
Hearings Board, would be able to implement.<br />
I think hams need to give themselves<br />
some leetl'l, Wayne, The FCC already<br />
makes a provision to listen to the advice<br />
01 frequency coordinators in disputes<br />
arising from repeater interference<br />
cases. Why not give the VECs a<br />
lillie more authority to regu late the<br />
hams Ihay are licensing?<br />
Howard Pomeroy KA1 ZCY. Suffield<br />
CT One of the reasons I'm writin g is to<br />
inform you that I finally passed my<br />
Novice CW and theory. and no w,<br />
Wayne, I am a ham. My callsign is<br />
KA1ZCY, and I am so proud of it. My<br />
only regrel is that my dear Mom and<br />
Dad <strong>we</strong>ren 't here to share my excitement<br />
with me .<br />
73is a fine journal, my only comment<br />
is I wish the "OX" column <strong>we</strong>re a bit<br />
larger.<br />
G, Eric Fergu son KA6USJ, Concord<br />
CA OK. You' ve finally done it!! I am<br />
now motivated to upgrade from Novice<br />
to Tech. I' m your Bth place winner in<br />
the Ham-it-Up S<strong>we</strong>epsta kes, Up till<br />
now, I have had man y excuses to not<br />
upgrade. Lack of money, no place lor<br />
an antenna, can't remember code,<br />
etc., <strong>we</strong>i!, you get the idea. Even my<br />
Commodore 64 was given to me, and<br />
now it's an orphan , I have never been<br />
on the air yet, and have had my license<br />
lor around 10 years. I admit I was hoping<br />
to win an HF rig, but • think I' m<br />
really going to enjoy the 2m/440 rig.<br />
THANKS!I<br />
Fran KG7NZ via 73 BBS • enjoy your<br />
magazlne immensely. Never stop griping<br />
and grousing, it encourages the<br />
res! of us to consider other ideas and<br />
problems.l also loo k torwaro to logging<br />
some time on your BSS now that it is up<br />
and running .<br />
The new BaS has been up and running<br />
full·lime since the end of July. Everyone<br />
is <strong>we</strong>lcome to browse Ihrough the<br />
ever-growing liat of useful programs<br />
you can download. We now have over<br />
1000 users! Feel free to give it a call at<br />
(603) 525-4438.. . . Bill WB8ELK