06.12.2012 Views

Advanced Equity and Trusts Law - alastairhudson.com

Advanced Equity and Trusts Law - alastairhudson.com

Advanced Equity and Trusts Law - alastairhudson.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TOPIC 4. THEMES IN EQUITY AND TRUSTS<br />

Aim: The aim of this seminar is to summarise at the outset some of the key thematic <strong>and</strong> intellectual<br />

questions which this course will seek to address <strong>and</strong> which will be assessed ultimately in the form of essays<br />

(as opposed to much of this course which focuses otherwise on problem-solving).<br />

A. Definition<br />

LECTURE MATERIALS<br />

1. What is meant by “conscience”?<br />

2. Where is the line between personal <strong>and</strong> proprietary rights?<br />

B. <strong>Equity</strong> in <strong>com</strong>mercial law<br />

1. If the central philosophy of <strong>com</strong>mercial law is certainty, how does equity interact<br />

with <strong>com</strong>mercial law?<br />

2. Commercial law uses equitable doctrines like floating charges, trusts <strong>and</strong><br />

tracing to take security <strong>and</strong> to recover property.<br />

3. Commercial law is nevertheless suspicious of judicial discretion as exercised<br />

through equity: why?<br />

4. How does the law relating to ownership of the home differ from trusts used in<br />

<strong>com</strong>mercial contexts? Will this lead to a schism in trusts law?<br />

5. How does financial regulation correlate with the ordinary law of trust – see, for<br />

example, regulation of pensions, regulation of unit trusts, <strong>and</strong> FSA regulation<br />

of trustees trading as authorised persons.<br />

C. The dem<strong>and</strong>s of international trusts law practice<br />

1. Can trusts be better understood on the basis of contractual models: e.g.<br />

exclusion of liability of trustees?<br />

2. Is the beneficiary principle necessary, or would international trusts law fare<br />

better by using protectors <strong>and</strong> other devices?<br />

3. Is the trust part of property law or of the law of obligations?<br />

4. Do these mooted developments qualify the notion of fiduciary liability?<br />

D. Competing models to the conscience-based model<br />

1. Is unjust enrichment a better model for equitable doctrines like resulting trust<br />

<strong>and</strong> constructive trust than conscience-based models?<br />

2. Is there a coherent basis for constructive trusts?<br />

www.<strong>alastairhudson</strong>.<strong>com</strong> | © professor alastair hudson<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!