12.09.2015 Views

HORIZON

issue no. 183 - april–june 2012 / jumada-al-awwal - Institute of ...

issue no. 183 - april–june 2012 / jumada-al-awwal - Institute of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NEW<strong>HORIZON</strong> Jumada-Al-Awwal to Rajab 1433<br />

ANALYSIS<br />

Restructuring Sukuk Transactions<br />

By: Debashis Dey, Stuart Ure and Peter Wielgosz, Clifford Chance LLP<br />

In contrast to conventional<br />

bonds, which represent the<br />

issuer’s contractual debt<br />

obligations to bondholders,<br />

sukuk represent an undivided<br />

beneficial ownership interest in<br />

an underlying tangible asset<br />

and therefore a right to receive<br />

a share of profits generated by<br />

such an asset base, which can<br />

be structured to produce a<br />

fixed income return.<br />

Overview<br />

In the wake of the recent global financial<br />

turbulence, the Eurozone debt crisis and the<br />

resulting volatility in international capital<br />

markets, issuers are actively looking at<br />

reviewing their capital structures. Indeed,<br />

many Gulf-based issuers are examining the<br />

application of liability management<br />

strategies and/or restructuring strategies in<br />

the context of their existing sukuk<br />

transactions. Some are asking whether it is<br />

possible to achieve a waiver or amendment<br />

through a consent solicitation if their<br />

financial covenants are being stressed.<br />

Questions such as ‘can we buy-in and cancel<br />

debt at relatively depressed prices?’ or ‘can<br />

we extend the maturity of an outstanding<br />

series of debt securities, by exchanging it for<br />

a new series of longer-dated instruments?’<br />

are increasingly raised with legal and<br />

financial advisers.<br />

In the first part of this article, we<br />

examine the challenges involved in a<br />

liability management exercise for a sukuk<br />

as compared to a conventional debt<br />

issuance and explore some common<br />

restructuring techniques. These techniques<br />

form the building blocks for a possible<br />

approach to restructuring a sukuk<br />

transaction, which is set out in the second<br />

part of the article. Acknowledging that the<br />

challenges in each liability management<br />

exercise for a sukuk will be different and<br />

will depend on the specific underlying<br />

Islamic structure, in the final section we<br />

refer to recent market examples to<br />

demonstrate that it is possible to implement<br />

restructurings, which have the same<br />

commercial effect for an obligor seeking to<br />

manage its outstanding liability under a<br />

sukuk transaction.<br />

Common Debt Restructuring Techniques<br />

An issuer seeking to restructure its<br />

outstanding debt securities has several tools<br />

for liability management at its disposal.<br />

Without exploring the alternatives available<br />

to it under applicable bankruptcy rules,<br />

which lie outside the scope of this article,<br />

the company may decide between a number<br />

of strategies, the most common of which<br />

involve a tender offer, exchange offer,<br />

consent solicitation or any combination of<br />

these. Although such options are available<br />

to both issuers of conventional debt<br />

securities and sukuk (the Shari’ah-compliant<br />

alternative to conventional interest-bearing<br />

fixed income securities), implementing one<br />

or more of the above strategies becomes<br />

significantly more complicated in the case of<br />

restructuring sukuk transactions. The<br />

reason for this added complexity lies in the<br />

nature of sukuk as an asset-based security.<br />

In contrast to conventional bonds, which<br />

represent the issuer’s contractual debt<br />

obligations to bondholders, sukuk represent<br />

an undivided beneficial ownership interest<br />

in an underlying tangible asset and therefore<br />

a right to receive a share of profits<br />

generated by such an asset base, which can<br />

be structured to produce a fixed income<br />

return. Furthermore, for a sukuk structure<br />

to be Shari’ah-compliant, there must be a<br />

direct link between the assets that underpin<br />

the cash flows on the sukuk and the<br />

ownership interest of the investors in such<br />

assets. Typically, this link can be achieved<br />

through the ‘sale’ and consequential transfer<br />

of title of an asset to a newly formed special<br />

purpose vehicle (SPV) that will hold such<br />

assets on trust or as agent for the investors.<br />

As a result of the inherent proprietary<br />

nature of sukuk, the implementation of<br />

some of the liability management strategies<br />

outlined above is more complex and has<br />

greater limitations than the application of<br />

similar strategies to conventional debt<br />

securities. The limitations of these strategies<br />

as applicable to sukuk restructurings are<br />

explored further below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!