Feminist Ca
Read Chapters Two and Three - Aqueduct Press
Read Chapters Two and Three - Aqueduct Press
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mothers of the Revolution \ 91<br />
original intention of playing a trick on a group of male fans. Nevertheless,<br />
much of the material in Femizine, and the reaction to this<br />
all-female venture, still provides evidence for a desire among fans to<br />
recognize some form of commonality between the women scattered<br />
through fandom, and to achieve greater recognition for their contributions<br />
to fandom. Indeed, in the first issue, <strong>Ca</strong>rr notes that Evans<br />
and Lindsay were “really the originators of the idea” of a fanzine for<br />
women (following the model of the all-female Femzine in the US)<br />
(Warner Jr. 1977: 89-90) and that the contributions from other women<br />
such as Ina Shorrock showed “that there is a genuine need for FEM-<br />
IZINE” (<strong>Ca</strong>rr 1954: 18).<br />
In May 1956, <strong>Ca</strong>rr’s true identity was revealed in the ninth issue<br />
of Femizine — the “hoax issue” — which contained extended commentaries<br />
and reminiscences from those involved. Evans and Lindsay,<br />
the two co-conspirators, wrote of their role in the hoax and detailed<br />
their increasing misgivings about Joan’s role in Femizine. Their discomfort<br />
was caused by the whole-hearted acceptance not just of this<br />
“fake female,” but also of Femizine itself, which was so “wildly successful<br />
that it drew up to 100 locs [letters of comment] per issue”<br />
(Warner Jr. 1977: 90). When, for example, the second issue drew an<br />
unfavorable review, Lindsay recalled that,<br />
the other femme fans rallied to our side, and defended us<br />
stoutly. They did all they could to help, and began to take a<br />
real pride in FEZ. That was when my troubles really started.<br />
I had been thinking of Joan as a separate personality…<br />
However, I began to wake up to the fact that I could not<br />
expect the rest of fandom to feel the same way. I began to<br />
worry what they would say when the news came out. At the<br />
same time so did Frances, who asked me if I ever woke up in<br />
a cold sweat thinking about it. I did. (Lindsay 1956: 10)<br />
By 1955, as Hansen notes, “Evans and Lindsay were becoming increasingly<br />
uneasy about the lie at the heart of Femizine, that a fanzine<br />
that had become a rallying point for Britain’s female fans was<br />
secretly edited by a man.” They decided to try and alleviate the situation<br />
by suggesting that Femizine be opened to male contributors, and<br />
discussed this with other female fans at the 1955 national convention<br />
(“Cytricon” held in Kettering, from then on held over Easter) But, as<br />
Lindsay recalled: