FSA Annual Report 2006/07 - Better Regulation Ltd
FSA Annual Report 2006/07 - Better Regulation Ltd
FSA Annual Report 2006/07 - Better Regulation Ltd
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section three – Improving our business capability and effectiveness<br />
<strong>FSA</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2006</strong>/<strong>07</strong><br />
43<br />
Improvements to our<br />
Authorisation and<br />
Approvals regimes<br />
Following a review of our<br />
Authorisation manual we deleted it<br />
from our Handbook. Instead we<br />
provide firms with information on<br />
the authorisation section of our<br />
website, which can be updated<br />
quickly and easily. This decision was<br />
partly influenced by our desire to<br />
maintain the competitive position of<br />
the UK financial markets. The<br />
regulatory framework, and in<br />
particular the authorisation process,<br />
is a factor in determining where<br />
firms set up business. During the<br />
year we have worked closely with<br />
several agencies: Think London, the<br />
foreign direct investment agency;<br />
The Economic Development Office<br />
of the City of London Corporation;<br />
and a number of UK trade and<br />
investment offices, particularly those<br />
in New York, Chicago, Atlanta and<br />
Mumbai, to improve international<br />
businesses’ understanding of our<br />
requirements. These discussions have<br />
contributed to overseas companies<br />
choosing to set up offices in the UK<br />
instead of other jurisdictions.<br />
In <strong>2006</strong> we published a combined<br />
Feedback Statement and<br />
Consultation Paper on proposed<br />
reforms to our Approved Persons<br />
regime, and in January and February<br />
20<strong>07</strong> we published our final Policy<br />
Statements. We have removed the<br />
requirement on firms to submit an<br />
annual significant management<br />
function report and have deleted the<br />
sole trader function. We estimate<br />
that our proposals will save firms<br />
around £3m a year in administration<br />
costs.<br />
Enforcement settlement<br />
procedures<br />
Following the outcome of our<br />
Enforcement Process Review we<br />
introduced new executive settlement<br />
procedures. <strong>2006</strong> was the first full<br />
year of using these new procedures.<br />
Settlement allows us to ensure<br />
prompt redress and remedial action,<br />
explain to industry the standards we<br />
expect and move on to focus on the<br />
next important issue. In <strong>2006</strong>/<strong>07</strong><br />
most enforcement cases were settled<br />
before reaching the Regulatory<br />
Decisions Committee – two-thirds of<br />
disciplinary cases settled and all<br />
cases involving a financial penalty<br />
settled during the first settlement<br />
phase, receiving the full 30%<br />
discount on the financial penalty.<br />
Further information on our<br />
enforcement activity can be found in<br />
Appendix Five of this <strong>Report</strong> and in<br />
the Enforcement <strong>Annual</strong><br />
Performance Account, published on<br />
our website.<br />
Fees<br />
Payment of regulatory fees and<br />
levies by instalment has continued to<br />
be popular with firms. We have<br />
advertised the availability of this<br />
payment option through our<br />
website, communications with small<br />
firms and on the invoices we issue to<br />
firms.