racetracks
I want to be left alone! - The Times-Tribune
I want to be left alone! - The Times-Tribune
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Do Not Call<br />
Continued from page one<br />
list went into effect, many states, including<br />
Pennsylvania, developed statewide Do<br />
Not Call lists with the same purpose: to<br />
keep unwanted telemarketers from calling<br />
consumers at home. Millions of<br />
Pennsylvanians signed up, jamming the<br />
toll-free phone number and Internet Web<br />
site in the first few days.<br />
One Pennsylvania company that uses<br />
telemarketing regularly is Commonwealth<br />
Telephone Enterprises in Luzerne County.<br />
While telemarketing is a component of<br />
their marketing strategy, the company<br />
already had many of the policies outlined<br />
in the national list as its own procedures.<br />
Depending on the marketing campaign,<br />
CTE contacts customers<br />
based on<br />
geography, if the<br />
consumers are current<br />
clients, or if<br />
they are looking to<br />
add new clients.<br />
“The list has had a<br />
modest, if not<br />
minor, impact. Our<br />
company policy and<br />
customer approach<br />
were already aligned<br />
with the policies of<br />
the Do Not Call list<br />
for some time.We<br />
even have our own list. Our approach has<br />
been, and is today, very much in line with<br />
the FTC’s list.We had some administrative<br />
and tracking issues, but addressed those,”<br />
says Joe Mozden, senior vice president of<br />
sales and marketing for Commonwealth<br />
Telephone Enterprises.<br />
Maria Brannon, operations manager of<br />
Telemarketing Resources Inc. of Scranton,<br />
says these new lists have only made her<br />
staff more efficient with their telemarketing<br />
efforts.“We do not contact people who<br />
do not want to be contacted.We do work<br />
all over the state; for lawyers in<br />
Philadelphia and several newspapers, even<br />
companies in California, but we have strict<br />
guidelines,” she says.<br />
One problem with the list, according to<br />
Brannon, is that people think they are on<br />
the list and they aren’t.“The system is<br />
automated, so wrong area codes are associated<br />
with wrong prefixes; when someone<br />
thinks they are on the Do Not Call<br />
list, and we call them, we have to listen<br />
to them explain that they are on the list.<br />
When they are that adamant about not<br />
wanting to be called, we explain to them<br />
how to correctly get their numbers on<br />
these lists,” says Brannon.<br />
While virtually all of the telemarketing<br />
firms in the Scranton and Wilkes-<br />
Barre areas have shut down or moved<br />
The Faces and Places of<br />
Telemarketing<br />
■ The median population of the towns and<br />
cities where outbound call centers are located:<br />
26,532.<br />
■ Twelve percent of the towns and cities with<br />
call centers also are communities that have been<br />
designated by the federal government as labor<br />
surplus areas or empowerment or enterprise<br />
areas qualifying for federal benefits and incentives<br />
to keep businesses and their employees in place.<br />
■ Another view of telemarketers is their national<br />
mean annual wage of $20,285 compared to the<br />
national mean annual wage of other sales professionals,<br />
which is $31,535, and the national mean<br />
wage of all workers, which is $37,005.5<br />
Source: The Direct Marketing Association,<br />
www.the-dma.org<br />
While virtually all of<br />
the telemarketing<br />
firms in the Scranton and<br />
Wilkes-Barre areas have shut<br />
down or moved since the<br />
Pennsylvania list went into<br />
effect, Telemarketing<br />
Resources Inc. is here to stay.<br />
48 • NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA BUSINESS JOURNAL • SEPTEMBER 2003<br />
since the Pennsylvania list went into<br />
effect,Telemarketing Resources Inc. is<br />
here to stay.<br />
“We’re the last company left… we<br />
employ over 30 people.That tells you how<br />
we do business, the relationships we have<br />
with the companies we do work for and<br />
the integrity of our workers. Nobody is losing<br />
his job here.The owner is working<br />
very hard to make sure that everyone here<br />
keeps his job,” says Brannon.<br />
So why is it that so many consumers hate<br />
being called by telemarketers? The answer,<br />
according to an area psychology professor,<br />
is rather simple.<br />
“These calls are an invasion of privacy.<br />
They are totally uninvited and are a nuisance.They<br />
typically interrupt family time<br />
and important conversations, usually over<br />
dinner, because that<br />
is the time of day<br />
when most telemarketers<br />
make their<br />
calls,” says Charles<br />
LaJeunesse, Ph.D.,<br />
professor of psychology<br />
at College<br />
Misericordia in<br />
Dallas.“In the early<br />
days it was chronic,<br />
with people calling<br />
constantly and<br />
many of the products<br />
were distasteful.That’s<br />
where<br />
the negative image<br />
first started for the telemarketing industry.”<br />
After a while, according to LaJeunesse,<br />
consumers started fighting back, and<br />
telephone companies began to help,<br />
offering services such as Caller ID, so<br />
homeowners could screen a call before<br />
answering.Today’s technology, such as a<br />
new program offered by CTE, is much<br />
more sophisticated.<br />
An alternative to signing up for statewide<br />
and national lists,“Block ’em” prevents<br />
unwanted, unidentified telemarketing calls<br />
from getting through to a consumer’s<br />
home phone.“If a telemarketer calls your<br />
house, and you have this service, and it recognizes<br />
the number as being a telemarketer,<br />
it automatically adds your phone<br />
number to that company’s personal ‘do not<br />
call’ list,” explains Mozden.<br />
Customers talk back<br />
As much as people complain about<br />
advertising — all the junk mail, spam and<br />
telemarketing calls — they really do<br />
want to be in the marketing loop, says<br />
Michael R. Solomon, in his book,<br />
“Conquering Consumerspace: Marketing<br />
Strategies for a Branded World.”<br />
(www.amanet.org/books/catalog).<br />
Rather than “passive pawns at the<br />
receiving end of a sales pitch, consumers<br />
are control freaks,” says Solomon.<br />
“We enjoy the feeling of power that<br />
comes from having input into what we<br />
do, see and buy — even if it just means<br />
getting to vote on a candy flavor,” as<br />
Lifesavers demonstrated several years ago<br />
when the company threatened to eliminate<br />
the pineapple flavor in its popular<br />
candy and more than 400,000 people rallied<br />
to “save” it.<br />
Studies show a correlation between<br />
good health and feeling in control, he<br />
says.“We want to be involved, we want to<br />
know if we’re having an impact and we<br />
hunger for the validation that comes from<br />
making the ‘correct selections.’”<br />
Fast Facts —<br />
Telemarketing and Blast Fax<br />
FCC Changes Fax Rule Again<br />
Regarding Established Business<br />
Relationships<br />
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)<br />
last month announced that it was extending the<br />
Aug. 25, 2003, deadline for companies to get<br />
their customers’ prior written permission before<br />
sending them commercial faxes until Jan. 1,<br />
2005. The FCC’s August 18 order “extend[s],<br />
until Jan. 1, 2005, the effective date of our determination<br />
that an established business relationship<br />
will no longer be sufficient to show that an<br />
individual or business has given express permission<br />
to receive unsolicited facsimile advertisements.”<br />
Previously, the FCC — as part of its<br />
recently announced changes to the Telephone<br />
Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) – had<br />
changed TCPA rules so that all commercial faxes<br />
were prohibited unless the sender had the recipient’s<br />
prior written permission to send the fax —<br />
even if the sender was faxing a consumer or business<br />
with whom it had an existing business relationship<br />
— beginning on August 25. For the FCC’s<br />
order, go to<br />
hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC<br />
-03-208A1.doc.<br />
New FCC rule regarding voice mail<br />
The Direct Marketing Association (The DMA) is<br />
giving notice to members of a new Federal<br />
Communications Commission (FCC) rule that<br />
impacts marketers who employ a “live” operator<br />
to leave either a personal or a pre-recorded commercial<br />
message on prospective customers’<br />
voicemail when the person is unavailable. The<br />
Association is urging members affected by the<br />
change to contact FCC staff immediately.<br />
The FCC’s recent amendments to the Telephone<br />
Consumer Protection Act of 1991, which were<br />
announced on June 26 and took effect on Aug.<br />
25, 2003, included a little-noticed provision that<br />
prohibits for-profit companies from leaving commercial<br />
messages on non-customers’ voicemail.<br />
In particular, the Commission’s rules now forbid<br />
almost all uses of prerecorded messages — even<br />
to reach people who are not on the Federal Trade<br />
Commission’s (FTC) National Do Not Call Registry,<br />
which opened its doors on June 27.<br />
Moreover, the new FCC rule forbids the use of a<br />
prerecorded message even when the message<br />
does not constitute “unsolicited advertising.”<br />
For example, the most significant change from<br />
the FCC’s previous rules is that prerecorded messages<br />
that invite customers to call back in order<br />
to meet with a potential vendor of goods, property,<br />
or services are now banned.<br />
Consequently, any entity – such as insurance<br />
companies, mortgage companies, resort timeshare<br />
providers, home improvement contractors,<br />
personal health and self-improvement – that previously<br />
used prerecorded messages in an effort to<br />
generate interest from prospective customers can<br />
no longer do so unless it fits within one of the<br />
five narrow exceptions listed below:<br />
1. Made for emergency purposes;<br />
2. Not made for a commercial purpose;<br />
3. Made for a commercial purpose but<br />
does nothing more than leave a name and<br />
call-back number;<br />
4. Made to a person with whom the caller has<br />
an existing, established business relationship; or<br />
5. Made by or on behalf of a tax-exempt<br />
organization.<br />
Source: The Direct Marketing Association, www.the-dma.org<br />
Statistics —<br />
Direct Mail and Spam<br />
Weight of paper in U.S. municipal solid waste in<br />
1980: 55 million tons<br />
Weight of paper in U.S. municipal solid waste in<br />
1999: 87.5 million tons<br />
Number of trees it takes to make a ton of paper:<br />
24<br />
Weight of catalogs and other direct mailings in<br />
the U.S. municipal solid waste stream in 1999:<br />
5.6 million tons<br />
Rate at which bulk mail was recycled in 1999:<br />
22 percent<br />
Number of garbage trucks it would take to haul<br />
away all the unrecycled junk mail in the U.S. to<br />
landfills and incinerators each year: 340,000<br />
Typical weight of 4 elephants:<br />
17.8 tons<br />
Amount of bulk mail delivered annually by each<br />
of the U.S. Postal Service's 293,000 letter carriers:<br />
17.8 tons<br />
Amount of time the average American spends<br />
opening bulk mail over the course of his or her<br />
life: 8 months<br />
Percentage of bulk mail that is thrown away<br />
unopened: 44 percent<br />
Money spent by U.S. companies on direct mail<br />
in 1993: $27.3 billion<br />
Money spent by U.S. companies on direct mail<br />
in 1998: $39.3 billion<br />
Tax dollars spent to dispose of junk mail:<br />
$320 million<br />
Pieces of bulk mail sent by U.S. nonprofits in<br />
one year: 12 billion<br />
Amount donated to nonprofits in response to<br />
those bulk mailings: $50 billion<br />
Source: www.newdream.org<br />
SPAM STATISTICS<br />
In 1999, the average consumer received 40<br />
pieces of spam. By 2005, Jupiter estimates, the<br />
total is likely to soar to 2000.<br />
■ America Online estimates that spam<br />
already accounts for more than 30 percent<br />
of e-mail to its members – as many as 24<br />
million messages a day.<br />
■ Seventy-four percent of customers<br />
believe that their ISPs should be responsible<br />
for fixing spam problems.<br />
■ Seven percent of ISP churn was directly<br />
attributed to spam.<br />
■ Thirty-six percent of e-mail users would<br />
switch ISPs in order to reduce the flow of<br />
spam they received.<br />
■ Twenty-four percent of users would be willing<br />
to pay an incremental for spam blocking.<br />
■ AOL alone receives 250,000 spam-related<br />
complaints every day.<br />
■ Nearly $2 of each customer's monthly bill can<br />
be attributed to electronic junk mail and other<br />
forms of spam.<br />
Source: www.anti-spam-software.com