- Page 1 and 2: 2011-12 General report on the audit
- Page 3 and 4: General report on the audit outcome
- Page 5 and 6: KEY ROLE PLAYERS NOT PROVIDING ASSU
- Page 7 and 8: In working towards sustainable clea
- Page 9 and 10: Aspect Indicator Key outcomes and t
- Page 11 and 12: Aspect Indicator Key outcomes and t
- Page 13 and 14: Aspect Indicator Key outcomes and t
- Page 15: Table 2: Summary of audit outcomes
- Page 19 and 20: Indicator Key outcomes and trends c
- Page 21 and 22: Indicator Key outcomes and trends L
- Page 23 and 24: Indicator Key outcomes and trends A
- Page 25 and 26: In 2011-12, one district municipali
- Page 27 and 28: 2.1.4 Status and outcomes of audits
- Page 29 and 30: Swellendam experienced a breakdown
- Page 31 and 32: The purpose of the annual audit of
- Page 33 and 34: The three most common qualification
- Page 35 and 36: The Public Audit Act, 2004 (Act No.
- Page 37 and 38: Findings on reliability relate to w
- Page 39 and 40: The PAA requires the AGSA to audit
- Page 41 and 42: Table 10: Summarised findings in ot
- Page 43 and 44: The AGSA audits included an assessm
- Page 45 and 46: Table 12: Prohibited awards to empl
- Page 47 and 48: Table 13: Awards to close family me
- Page 49 and 50: Suppliers were required to submit a
- Page 51 and 52: eap the required benefits. More emp
- Page 53 and 54: The MFMA requires accounting office
- Page 55 and 56: The previous figure reflects the th
- Page 57 and 58: The previous figure reflects the th
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 11: Nature of and overall tr
- Page 61 and 62: Indicator Auditors identify a large
- Page 63 and 64: Root cause number 1: Slow response
- Page 65 and 66: Root cause number 3: Key positions
- Page 67 and 68:
3.2 Significant deficiencies in aud
- Page 69 and 70:
Good Concerned Poor The status of t
- Page 71 and 72:
Driver no. 1: Leadership Movement A
- Page 73 and 74:
the requirement of the MFMA. Driver
- Page 75 and 76:
3.3 Human resource management Effec
- Page 77 and 78:
Indicator Vacant CFO positions Vaca
- Page 79 and 80:
Indicator minimum competencies CFO
- Page 81 and 82:
Unqualified with no findings (5) Un
- Page 83 and 84:
A lack of discipline, an absence of
- Page 85 and 86:
Indicator Key findings Allegations
- Page 87 and 88:
3.4.2 Summary of the overall audit
- Page 89 and 90:
3.4.3.1 Metropolitan municipalities
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 15: Security management audi
- Page 93 and 94:
Minimal improvement Controls not de
- Page 95 and 96:
3.4.6 Information technology servic
- Page 97 and 98:
3.4.7 Quick wins and recommendation
- Page 99 and 100:
3.5 Audit committees and internal a
- Page 101 and 102:
Governance structure aspect Audit c
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 21: Level of assurance provi
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 32: Comments on the level of
- Page 107 and 108:
Provincial role players do have a n
- Page 109 and 110:
Auditee Coordinating/ monitoring in
- Page 111 and 112:
• The role players within the mun
- Page 113 and 114:
4.3 Interactions with mayors In res
- Page 115 and 116:
4.4 Initiatives and commitments of
- Page 117 and 118:
Key role players Outline of initiat
- Page 119 and 120:
Key role players Outline of initiat
- Page 121 and 122:
ecome standard practice to brief th
- Page 123 and 124:
Management is responsible for the s
- Page 125 and 126:
69% (18) 100% (1) 60% (3) 70% (14)
- Page 127 and 128:
35% write-off of debts. Only three
- Page 129 and 130:
The following figure elaborates on
- Page 131 and 132:
5.2.4 Financial performance and pos
- Page 133 and 134:
2011-12 audit outcome 2010-11 audit
- Page 135:
ANNEXURE 3: Auditee’ audit opinio