29.09.2015 Views

Séminaire BOURBAKI Janvier 2012 64ème année, 2011-2012, n ...

Séminaire BOURBAKI Janvier 2012 64ème année, 2011-2012, n ...

Séminaire BOURBAKI Janvier 2012 64ème année, 2011-2012, n ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1049–08<br />

3.3. Solvable and locally solvable n-diagrams<br />

The homomorphism H 1 (k, E[n]) → H 1 (k, E) corresponds to sending an n-diagram<br />

C → S to the torsor C. Its kernel, which is isomorphic to E(k)/nE(k) (cf. (1)), corresponds<br />

to the set of n-diagrams C → S for which C has a k-point; such n-diagrams are<br />

called solvable:<br />

{solvable n-diagrams for E}<br />

(8)<br />

←→ E(k)<br />

isomorphism<br />

nE(k) .<br />

An n-diagram C → S over Q is locally solvable if C has a Q p -point for all p ≤ ∞. In<br />

this case, S too has a Q p -point for all p ≤ ∞, and hence S ≃ P n−1 , by the local-global<br />

principle for the Brauer group. (Not every n-diagram with S ≃ P n−1 is locally solvable,<br />

however.) By (1), we have a bijection<br />

(9)<br />

3.4. Binary quartic forms<br />

{locally solvable n-diagrams for E}<br />

isomorphism<br />

←→ Sel n (E).<br />

With an eye towards Section 3.5, we consider the space Q[x, y] 4 of binary quartic<br />

forms. There is a left action of GL 2 (Q) on Q[x, y] 4 given by (γ · f)(x, y) := f((x, y)γ)<br />

(we view (x, y) as a row vector). This induces an action of GL 2 (Q) on the algebra<br />

Q[a, b, c, d, e] of polynomial functions in the coefficients of f := ax 4 + bx 3 y + cx 2 y 2 +<br />

dxy 3 + ey 4 . The subalgebra of SL 2 -invariants is Q[a, b, c, d, e] SL 2<br />

= Q[I, J] = Q[A, B],<br />

where<br />

I := 12ae − 3bd + c 2<br />

J := 72ace + 9bcd − 27ad 2 − 27eb 2 − 2c 3<br />

A := −I/3<br />

B := −J/27.<br />

(Why −1/3 and −1/27? To make the Jacobian statement in Section 3.5 true.) A<br />

quartic form is separable if and only if its discriminant ∆ := −(4A 3 +27B 2 ) is nonzero. If<br />

γ ∈ GL 2 (Q) and f ∈ Q[x, y] 4 , then A(γ ·f) = (det γ) 4 A(f) and B(γ ·f) = (det γ) 6 B(f).<br />

Thus the twisted GL 2 -action γ ∗ f := (det γ) −2 (γ · f) induces a PGL 2 -action preserving<br />

A and B.<br />

3.5. Locally solvable 2-diagrams and binary quartic forms<br />

Let f ∈ Q[x, y] 4 . Let C be the curve z 2 = f(x, y) in the weighted projective plane<br />

P(1, 1, 2). Let Jac C be its Jacobian. Then there is an isomorphism between Jac C and<br />

the elliptic curve y 2 = x 3 +A(f)x+B(f), and the isomorphism depends algebraically on<br />

the coefficients of f. In fact, this makes C −→ (x:y)<br />

P 1 a 2-diagram. There is an approximate<br />

converse: any locally solvable 2-diagram for E is a degree 2 morphism C → P 1 equipped<br />

with an isomorphism Jac C → E such that C has a Q p -point for all p ≤ ∞; such a<br />

curve C is given by z 2 = f(x, y) in P(1, 1, 2), for some f(x, y) ∈ Q[x, y] 4 .<br />

Two locally solvable 2-diagrams are isomorphic if and only if the associated morphisms<br />

C → P 1 and C ′ → P 1 are isomorphic forgetting the torsor structures (if there<br />

exists an isomorphism of such morphisms, there is also an isomorphism respecting the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!