16.10.2015 Views

Hearts then Charts

Almighty_HeartThenCharts_2015

Almighty_HeartThenCharts_2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEARTS THEN CHARTS<br />

It’s not just you: institutional knowledge stored in mailing tubes and archival boxes<br />

Of the thirty organizations we audited, only nine had mapped even part of their customer’s<br />

journey. Of those nine, only one reported that customer journeys or maps were regularly<br />

used to drive decisions.<br />

Six of the thirty reported broader organizational attempts to map or segment the<br />

experiences of their customers. Only three of those companies continue to use those maps<br />

today. All three indicated that the documents are used only by the teams who created them.​<br />

Artifacts are only as valuable as the collective will to use them. With regular use, the<br />

organization develops a muscle memory that amplifies their utility. When used in isolation<br />

their utility is limited by the influence of those who commission them.<br />

Customer experience suffers when customer insights are hoarded — and at great cost to the<br />

enterprise. We heard this from a VP of Product Marketing at a large Consumer Packaged<br />

Goods brand:<br />

“We turn over the majority of our workforce every six or seven years.<br />

After the rollout of our customer journey work five years ago, the<br />

consulting firm we collaborated with left and we didn’t have a lot of<br />

subsequent opportunities to re-introduce the work to our teams.”<br />

Notably, only one of the six reported that the map used by the organization included<br />

interactions and experiences not directly delivered by the organization.<br />

Start here: build an (imperfect) map of the experience of being your customer.<br />

We tend to be extraordinarily poor at outlining the experiences of our customers. The<br />

availability heuristic 14 biases us toward describing experiences that tie closely to our<br />

organizational structures.<br />

To demonstrate this, ask a customer to list out the steps involved in purchasing one of<br />

your products or services. Ask a key member of your operations team to do the same.<br />

The differences between the two will almost always reveal areas in which your customer<br />

experience has significant room for improvement.<br />

We take a significant step forward when we can divide the customer experience into<br />

stages that see the process not through our organization’s structure, but through the eyes<br />

of the user. We make even more progress when we can use that process to make<br />

decisions at every level of the organization.<br />

Before you begin:<br />

• Assemble another cross-functional team of between 8 and 20 individuals. It’s not<br />

necessary that this team be entirely distinct from the group that helped define your<br />

customer types. It is, however, a good opportunity to involve more members of your<br />

organization in the process.<br />

• You’ll want a comfortable working space in which the team can work without distraction<br />

for a full eight-hour day<br />

• Again, you’ll want to schedule recurring monthly check-ins with the same group for at<br />

least a six month period<br />

• Ideally, the team will have access to the customer types you defined in the first exercise<br />

14<br />

a common bias that leads us to over-rely on easily-recalled models and examples in the evaluation of a system or process<br />

© 2015 ALMIGHTY LLC | 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!