KOSOVO
FSGjKF
FSGjKF
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM (NIS) ASSESSMENT<br />
On a small positive note, for the first time in 2013, the CEC<br />
administered local elections throughout the Kosovo territory,<br />
including the municipalities in the north of Kosovo. The 19<br />
April 2014 agreement between Kosovo and Serbia called<br />
for the OSCE’s involvement in “facilitating” these elections in<br />
accordance with Kosovo law and international standards. The<br />
CEC raised the concern that this would result in limited access<br />
to information with regards to the electoral process in the north<br />
of Kosovo, in particular for out-of-country voting. The chair<br />
publicly appealed to the OSCE to provide a written report. 32<br />
ENEMO’s report of 2013 stated that the unclear role and the<br />
OSCE’s interference may cause lack of trust and challenge<br />
the functioning of the system of electoral administration. 33<br />
TRANSPARENCY (LAW)<br />
SCORE 2011 50 2015 75<br />
To what extent are there provisions in place to<br />
ensure that the public can obtain relevant<br />
information on the activities and decisionmaking<br />
processes of the electoral<br />
management body?<br />
The 2011 NIS report indicated that there were not enough<br />
legal provisions to require that the CEC be transparent in its<br />
activities and decision-making. The major changes in legislation<br />
regarding transparency include the amendments to the Law<br />
on Political Party Financing in 2013. The CEC shall provide an<br />
annual report to the Assembly, 34 inclusive of information about<br />
activities of the CEC. As for election periods, it is required that<br />
within 60 days from the day of the official announcements of<br />
the election result, the CEC shall publish a complete report on<br />
the election expenditures and the manner of their spending. 35<br />
An accredited observer shall have access to all meetings<br />
and documents of an MEC. If an MEC does not allow attendance<br />
at a meeting, or access to a document, a complaint<br />
may be filed with the CEC. The CEC shall reach a decision<br />
on a complaint within 48 hours and take such action as it<br />
considers appropriate. 36 In addition, ECAP’s decisions shall<br />
be published in accordance with ECAP’s rules of procedure<br />
and shall become publicly available at ECAP’s webpage. 37<br />
The CEC Secretariat shall make the voters’ list available and<br />
accessible at the MEC Office in each municipality or other<br />
locations in conformity with data protection law. The results<br />
of the counts at the polling station shall be posted in the<br />
polling centre by its chair. The CEC is requested to publish<br />
the election results after they have been certified. Within 60<br />
days from the day of the official announcement of the election<br />
result, the CEC shall publish a complete report on the<br />
election expenditures and the manner of their spending. 38<br />
The transparency of party finances has been reinstated in the<br />
amended Law on Financing of Political Parties 39 adopted in<br />
2013. It requires that the CEC and political parties publish annual<br />
financial reports and campaign disclosure reports on their<br />
respective websites and in national daily newspapers. Parties<br />
are obliged to report all contributions (over 100 Euro), sources of<br />
contributions/donors, expenditures etc. and execute all financial<br />
transactions through a single bank account. If parties fail to<br />
do so, heavy punitive measures are foreseen. For instance, if<br />
parties do not prove the origin of their income source for over<br />
20,000 euro they will be fined three times that amount. 40<br />
TRANSPARENCY (PRACTICE)<br />
SCORE 2011 25 2015 25<br />
To what extent are reports and decisions of<br />
the electoral management body made public<br />
in practice?<br />
According to the 2011 NIS report, the CEC did not offer<br />
sufficient information to the public. The CEC was largely<br />
criticised for not sharing information on its website and not<br />
holding enough press conferences. However, in the last four<br />
years the CEC has slightly improved transparency in terms<br />
of sharing its reports and decisions with the public.<br />
Its website is more regularly updated owing to the support of<br />
international donors. 41 On its website, the CEC makes public the<br />
laws and rules pertaining to elections, all its decisions, lists of MEC<br />
members, list of polling centres, press releases and election reports,<br />
memorandums, and forms. The schedule of operations for<br />
electoral activities is also made public. There is an email address<br />
where interested parties can post questions related to requests for<br />
access to public documents. For the most part, the information<br />
is up-to-date. In addition, the CEC organises press conferences<br />
on a regular basis, and the meetings are open to the public.<br />
The ORPP also notifies political party officials on the changes<br />
pertaining to rules and procedures applicable to party financing. 42<br />
As far as the election process is concerned, the CEC came to a<br />
final decision as recommended by domestic monitoring CSOs<br />
126