07.11.2015 Views

KOSOVO

FSGjKF

FSGjKF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM (NIS) ASSESSMENT<br />

On a small positive note, for the first time in 2013, the CEC<br />

administered local elections throughout the Kosovo territory,<br />

including the municipalities in the north of Kosovo. The 19<br />

April 2014 agreement between Kosovo and Serbia called<br />

for the OSCE’s involvement in “facilitating” these elections in<br />

accordance with Kosovo law and international standards. The<br />

CEC raised the concern that this would result in limited access<br />

to information with regards to the electoral process in the north<br />

of Kosovo, in particular for out-of-country voting. The chair<br />

publicly appealed to the OSCE to provide a written report. 32<br />

ENEMO’s report of 2013 stated that the unclear role and the<br />

OSCE’s interference may cause lack of trust and challenge<br />

the functioning of the system of electoral administration. 33<br />

TRANSPARENCY (LAW)<br />

SCORE 2011 50 2015 75<br />

To what extent are there provisions in place to<br />

ensure that the public can obtain relevant<br />

information on the activities and decisionmaking<br />

processes of the electoral<br />

management body?<br />

The 2011 NIS report indicated that there were not enough<br />

legal provisions to require that the CEC be transparent in its<br />

activities and decision-making. The major changes in legislation<br />

regarding transparency include the amendments to the Law<br />

on Political Party Financing in 2013. The CEC shall provide an<br />

annual report to the Assembly, 34 inclusive of information about<br />

activities of the CEC. As for election periods, it is required that<br />

within 60 days from the day of the official announcements of<br />

the election result, the CEC shall publish a complete report on<br />

the election expenditures and the manner of their spending. 35<br />

An accredited observer shall have access to all meetings<br />

and documents of an MEC. If an MEC does not allow attendance<br />

at a meeting, or access to a document, a complaint<br />

may be filed with the CEC. The CEC shall reach a decision<br />

on a complaint within 48 hours and take such action as it<br />

considers appropriate. 36 In addition, ECAP’s decisions shall<br />

be published in accordance with ECAP’s rules of procedure<br />

and shall become publicly available at ECAP’s webpage. 37<br />

The CEC Secretariat shall make the voters’ list available and<br />

accessible at the MEC Office in each municipality or other<br />

locations in conformity with data protection law. The results<br />

of the counts at the polling station shall be posted in the<br />

polling centre by its chair. The CEC is requested to publish<br />

the election results after they have been certified. Within 60<br />

days from the day of the official announcement of the election<br />

result, the CEC shall publish a complete report on the<br />

election expenditures and the manner of their spending. 38<br />

The transparency of party finances has been reinstated in the<br />

amended Law on Financing of Political Parties 39 adopted in<br />

2013. It requires that the CEC and political parties publish annual<br />

financial reports and campaign disclosure reports on their<br />

respective websites and in national daily newspapers. Parties<br />

are obliged to report all contributions (over 100 Euro), sources of<br />

contributions/donors, expenditures etc. and execute all financial<br />

transactions through a single bank account. If parties fail to<br />

do so, heavy punitive measures are foreseen. For instance, if<br />

parties do not prove the origin of their income source for over<br />

20,000 euro they will be fined three times that amount. 40<br />

TRANSPARENCY (PRACTICE)<br />

SCORE 2011 25 2015 25<br />

To what extent are reports and decisions of<br />

the electoral management body made public<br />

in practice?<br />

According to the 2011 NIS report, the CEC did not offer<br />

sufficient information to the public. The CEC was largely<br />

criticised for not sharing information on its website and not<br />

holding enough press conferences. However, in the last four<br />

years the CEC has slightly improved transparency in terms<br />

of sharing its reports and decisions with the public.<br />

Its website is more regularly updated owing to the support of<br />

international donors. 41 On its website, the CEC makes public the<br />

laws and rules pertaining to elections, all its decisions, lists of MEC<br />

members, list of polling centres, press releases and election reports,<br />

memorandums, and forms. The schedule of operations for<br />

electoral activities is also made public. There is an email address<br />

where interested parties can post questions related to requests for<br />

access to public documents. For the most part, the information<br />

is up-to-date. In addition, the CEC organises press conferences<br />

on a regular basis, and the meetings are open to the public.<br />

The ORPP also notifies political party officials on the changes<br />

pertaining to rules and procedures applicable to party financing. 42<br />

As far as the election process is concerned, the CEC came to a<br />

final decision as recommended by domestic monitoring CSOs<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!