16.11.2015 Views

studies

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

2015SupplementFULLTEXT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HEPATOLOGY, VOLUME 62, NUMBER 1 (SUPPL) AASLD ABSTRACTS 723A<br />

MELD Change from Baseline to Follow-up Week 12<br />

Didier Samuel - Consulting: Astellas, MSD, BMS, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, LFB,<br />

Janssen-Cilag, Biotest, Abbvie<br />

Gregory T. Everson - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Roche/Genentech,<br />

Abbvie, Galectin, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, HepC<br />

Connection, BioTest, Gilead, Merck; Board Membership: HepQuant LLC, PSC<br />

Partners, HepQuant LLC; Consulting: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb;<br />

Grant/Research Support: Roche/Genentech, Pharmassett, Vertex, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers<br />

Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Conatus, PSC Partners, Vertex, Tibotec, GlobeImmune,<br />

Pfizer, Gilead; Management Position: HepQuant LLC, HepQuant LLC;<br />

Patent Held/Filed: Univ of Colorado; Speaking and Teaching: Abbvie, Gilead<br />

Xavier Forns - Consulting: Jansen, Abbvie; Grant/Research Support: Jansen,<br />

Gilead<br />

The following authors have nothing to disclose: Hans Van Vlierberghe, Robert<br />

Brown<br />

Disclosures:<br />

Edward J. Gane - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Novira, AbbVie, Janssen,<br />

Gilead Sciences, Janssen Cilag, Achillion, Merck, Tekmira; Speaking and<br />

Teaching: AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Merck<br />

Michael P. Manns - Consulting: Roche, BMS, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim,<br />

Novartis, Idenix, Achillion, GSK, Merck/MSD, Janssen, Medgenics; Grant/<br />

Research Support: Merck/MSD, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim,<br />

BMS; Speaking and Teaching: Merck/MSD, Roche, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, GSK,<br />

Novartis<br />

Geoff McCaughan - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead<br />

Michael P. Curry - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Bristol Meyers Squib,<br />

Abbvie; Grant/Research Support: Gilead Sciences, Mass Biologics, Merck,<br />

Salix, Conatus; Stock Shareholder: Achilion<br />

Markus Peck-Radosavljevic - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Bayer, Gilead,<br />

Janssen, BMS, AbbVie; Consulting: Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Jennerex,<br />

Eli Lilly, AbbVie; Grant/Research Support: Bayer, Roche, Gilead, MSD, AbbVie;<br />

Speaking and Teaching: Bayer, Roche, Gilead, MSD, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Bayer<br />

Jill M. Denning - Employment: Gilead Sciences, Inc.<br />

Sarah Arterburn - Employment: Gilead Sciences Inc.; Stock Shareholder: Gilead<br />

Sciences Inc.<br />

Phillip S. Pang - Employment: Gilead Sciences; Stock Shareholder: Gilead Sciences<br />

Diana M. Brainard - Employment: Gilead Sciences; Stock Shareholder: Gilead<br />

Sciences<br />

John G. McHutchison - Employment: Gilead Sciences; Stock Shareholder: Gilead<br />

Sciences<br />

Princy N. Kumar - Consulting: Janssen, ViiV Healthcare; Grant/Research Support:<br />

Janssen, Merck, GSK, Gilead; Stock Shareholder: Merck, Phizer, Johnson&-<br />

Johnson, GSK, Gilead<br />

Eric M. Yoshida - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Hoffman LaRoche, Gilead<br />

Sciences Inc, Abbvie; Grant/Research Support: Abbvie, Hoffman LaRoche,<br />

Merck Inc, Vertex Inc, Jannsen Inc, Gilead Sciences Inc, Boeringher Ingleheim<br />

Inc, Astellas; Speaking and Teaching: Gilead Sciences Inc, Merck Inc<br />

Massimo Colombo - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: BRISTOL-MEY-<br />

ERS-SQUIBB, SCHERING-PLOUGH, ROCHE, GILEAD, BRISTOL-MEYERS-SQUIBB,<br />

SCHERING-PLOUGH, ROCHE, GILEAD, Janssen Cilag, Achillion; Grant/<br />

Research Support: BRISTOL-MEYERS-SQUIBB, ROCHE, GILEAD, BRISTOL-MEY-<br />

ERS-SQUIBB, ROCHE, GILEAD; Speaking and Teaching: Glaxo Smith-Kline,<br />

BRISTOL-MEYERS-SQUIBB, SCHERING-PLOUGH, ROCHE, NOVARTIS, GILEAD,<br />

VERTEX, Glaxo Smith-Kline, BRISTOL-MEYERS-SQUIBB, SCHERING-PLOUGH,<br />

ROCHE, NOVARTIS, GILEAD, VERTEX, Sanofi<br />

Bart van Hoek - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Janssen-Cilag, Bristol<br />

Meyers Squib, Gilead, Merck, Abbvie<br />

Jean-Francois Dufour - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Bayer, BMS, Gilead,<br />

AbbVie, Novartis, Sillagen, Genfit<br />

Charles S. Landis - Grant/Research Support: Gilead, Abbvie, BMS<br />

David J. Mutimer - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead Sciences,<br />

AbbVie, Janssen, MSD, BMS; Speaking and Teaching: Gilead Sciences, AbbVie,<br />

Janssen, BMS<br />

Steven L. Flamm - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Gilead, Bristol Myers<br />

Squibb, AbbVie, Janssen, Salix; Consulting: Merck, Janssen, Bristol Myers<br />

Squibb, AbbVie, Salix, Gilead; Grant/Research Support: Janssen, Bristol Myers<br />

Squibb, Gilead, AbbVie; Speaking and Teaching: Salix<br />

Michael R. Charlton - Grant/Research Support: GIlead Sciences, Merck, Janssen,<br />

AbbVie, Novartis<br />

K. Rajender Reddy - Advisory Committees or Review Panels: Merck, Janssen,<br />

Vertex, Gilead, BMS, Abbvie; Grant/Research Support: Merck, BMS, Ikaria,<br />

Gilead, Janssen, AbbVie<br />

1050<br />

Adherence and Discontinuation Rates of Sofosbuvir-Based<br />

Regimens: Modeling Real World Experience in<br />

a Large Managed Care Organization<br />

Pravin S. Kamble 2 , David R. Walker 1 , Steven Marx 1 , Ray Harvey 2 ,<br />

Claudia L. Uribe 2 , Suvapun Bunniran 2 , Jenna Collins 2 ; 1 HEOR,<br />

Abbvie, North Chicago, IL; 2 Outcomes, Comprehensive Health<br />

Insights, Louisville, KY<br />

BACKGROUND Discontinuation (DC) rates of sofosbuvir (SOF)<br />

based medications are generally very low in clinical trials (<<br />

1%). Adherence (ADH) rates on the other hand are rarely<br />

reported in clinical trials. Only a handful of <strong>studies</strong> have examined<br />

this issue outside of clinical trials, however, those <strong>studies</strong><br />

did not comprehensively attempt to adjust for factors that may<br />

impact DC and ADH rates. OBJECTIVES The objective was to<br />

assess medication ADH and DC rates in SOF-based regimens<br />

and identify factors potentially associated with poor ADH and<br />

DC rates in patients with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). METH-<br />

ODS A retrospective cohort study using administrative claims<br />

data from a large managed care organization from May 2013<br />

to Sept 2014. Plan types included Medicare Advantage Prescription<br />

Drug (MAPD) and commercial (COM) which provide<br />

medical and pharmacy benefits. The study cohort included<br />

patients initiating 12 or 24-week treatment on SOF. The index<br />

date was defined as the first prescription fill date for SOF from<br />

Nov 2013 to March or May 2014 with a follow up period of<br />

12 or 24 weeks. Continuous enrollment for 6 months pre-index<br />

and 4 or 6 months post index date was required. ADH was calculated<br />

using proportion of days covered (PDC). Patients with<br />

at least 85% PDC were categorized as adherent. Patients were<br />

deemed discontinued if a gap of >14 days exists between<br />

fills. Regression analyses were conducted to identify baseline<br />

covariates associated with ADH or DC among plan members.<br />

Covariates included age, gender, risk score, plan type, geographic<br />

region, treatment co-pay, prior treatment experience,<br />

use of interferon, treatment duration and baseline healthcare<br />

use and costs. RESULTS In total, 514 MAPD and 63 COM<br />

members initiated HCV treatment with DAA. Patients were 63%<br />

male, mean age of 60 years, 84% on 12-week treatment,<br />

and 36% of SOF members were also on peginteferon. The<br />

discontinuation rate was 18% and the percent of members<br />

considered non-adherent was 14%. Based on the regression<br />

analysis, only older age, higher comorbidity risk score and<br />

use of peginterferon were significantly positively associated<br />

with non-adherence after controlling for other covariates. For<br />

12-week treatment patients, being in a non-HMO plan or in<br />

Medicare were predictors of being at lower risk of medication<br />

discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS In a real world setting, 14%<br />

of members on a new DAA are not adherent and 18% had<br />

fill gaps greater than 14 days. Sicker, older members are less<br />

likely to be adherent, whereas non-HMO and MAPD members

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!