07.12.2012 Views

Laplace transform isotherm .pdf - University of Hertfordshire ...

Laplace transform isotherm .pdf - University of Hertfordshire ...

Laplace transform isotherm .pdf - University of Hertfordshire ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The left-hand side <strong>of</strong> equation (2.14) is a function <strong>of</strong> space only, while the<br />

right-hand side is a function <strong>of</strong> time only. This means that both sides<br />

are equal to some constant, say µ, thus producing two equations which<br />

independently describe the effects <strong>of</strong> varying time and space:<br />

and<br />

dT (t)<br />

dt<br />

The analytic solution to equation (2.15) is<br />

= −µαT (t) (2.15)<br />

∇ 2 P (x,y) = −µP (x,y) (2.16)<br />

T (t) = Aexp (−µαt)<br />

where A is a constant. Equation (2.16) is the usual Helmholz equation, and<br />

together with the boundary conditions, gives an eigenvalue problem.<br />

The eigenvalues are the values <strong>of</strong> µ for which equation (2.16) has a non-<br />

trivial solution for P and the eigenfunctions are the corresponding values<br />

Pi(x,y). A Helmholtz equation in a finite domain has an infinite number <strong>of</strong><br />

non-negative eigenvalues, µi,i = 1,2,..., which are real, discrete and non-<br />

degenerate, (Courant and Hilbert 1953). The corresponding eigenfunctions<br />

form a complete orthogonal set and it follows that a general solution to the<br />

heat equation with homogeneous boundary conditions may be written in the<br />

form<br />

u(x,y,t) =<br />

∞�<br />

aiPi (x,y) exp (−µiαt) (2.17)<br />

i=1<br />

where the constants ai are determined by the initial conditions and are given<br />

by<br />

�<br />

u0PidA<br />

D<br />

ai = �<br />

D<br />

P 2<br />

i dA<br />

(2.18)<br />

and the integration is carried out over the bounded region D. Davies and<br />

Radford (2001) solved equation (2.16) by using a finite difference approxima-<br />

tion, restricting the problem to two-dimensional rectangular regions leading<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!