02.01.2016 Views

Le mag’

?magPdf=HS04

?magPdf=HS04

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Session 1 • Thursday, February 26, 2015 • 11:30 a.m.–1:00 p.m.<br />

(MND) delivered (charges 2–20) was determined using gas chromatography. The<br />

presence of specified and unspecified impurities was evaluated at 25°C and 60%<br />

relative humidity over 18 months using high-performance liquid chromatography.<br />

Results: MND delivered in single-day use was 0.433, 0.425, 0.429, 0.440,<br />

0.432, 0.415 and 0.436 mg per device tested. MND delivered (charge 4) was<br />

0.442 mg (relative standard deviation 9.7%). MND delivered over 7-day use was<br />

0.403 and 0.415 mg (device upright and inverted, respectively). After temperature<br />

cycling, the MND delivered was 0.424 mg both when upright and inverted. At 18<br />

months, nicotine N-oxide and carboxylic acid impurity (both 0.2%) and myosmine<br />

(0.1%) were detected. All individual and total levels of impurities met the product<br />

specification at 18 months.<br />

Conclusions: The MND values obtained were consistent across a range of<br />

in-use conditions with no deterioration in performance over the product lifetime.<br />

No significant levels of impurities were detected after 18 months’ storage.<br />

FUNDING: Kind Consumer Limited and Nicoventures Limited<br />

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Alan Silcock, Nicoventures Limited, 22 Tudor<br />

Street, London, EC4Y 0AY, United Kingdom, Phone: +44 207 9360657, Email:<br />

alan.silcock@nicoventures.co.uk<br />

POS1-24<br />

A NOVEL ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE WITH ADVANCED<br />

VAPORIZATION TECHNOLOGY: NICOTINE PHARMACOKINETICS<br />

(PK), SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY<br />

Girish Sharma 1 , David Lawson 2 *, Ceri Edwards 1 , Anthony Clarke 3 , 1 Simbec<br />

Research Ltd, Merthyr Tydfil, UK, 2 CN Creative Ltd, Manchester, UK, 3 Ricanto Ltd,<br />

Henley-on-Thames, UK<br />

Objective: To determine PK profile, safety and tolerability of nicotine delivered<br />

via a novel electronic cigarette (EC) vs the Nicorette(R) (a registered trademark of<br />

McNeil Products Limited) Inhalator (NI) and a conventional cigarette.<br />

Background: There is increasing interest in EC use to reduce smoking-related<br />

morbidity. A novel EC using advanced vaporization technology has been developed<br />

to current regulatory standards to deliver medicinal-grade nicotine.<br />

Design/Methods: In this randomized, open-label, crossover, Phase I study,<br />

24 healthy men (18–65 years) who smoked 10–20 cigarettes/day for at least 5<br />

years received nicotine using a novel EC at two dose strengths (10 [3.0% v/v] and<br />

15 mg [4.5% v/v]), the reference product NI (15 mg) and cigarette (0.9–1.0 mg).<br />

Participants received all 4 products in a randomized sequence on consecutive<br />

days. One product was used 4 times at hourly intervals each day; each usage<br />

comprised 10 inhalations (2-sec inhalations for cigarette and 3-sec inhalations for<br />

other arms) at 30-sec intervals. PK assessments were made after the fourth use of<br />

each product. Safety was evaluated at predetermined time points.<br />

Results: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of nicotine achieved<br />

using the novel EC 10 or 15 mg was significantly higher than the NI (5.9 and<br />

7.0 vs 2.6 ng/mL) and significantly lower than a cigarette (29.7 ng/mL). Median<br />

time to Cmax (Tmax) for the EC 10 and 15 mg was significantly shorter than the<br />

NI (8.0 and 8.0 vs 9.5 min) and significantly longer than a cigarette (2.5 min).<br />

Nine treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported: novel EC 10<br />

mg (n=2); novel EC 15 mg (n=1); NI (n=2); cigarette (n=4). TEAEs reported for<br />

the novel EC or NI were mild or moderate in severity and considered unrelated,<br />

or unlikely to be related, to the products. No severe or serious AEs were reported.<br />

Conclusions: Peak nicotine plasma concentrations using the novel EC were<br />

dose-related, significantly higher and reached more rapidly than with the NI. Peak<br />

nicotine plasma concentrations using the novel EC were significantly lower than<br />

after cigarette smoking. The novel EC had a safety profile similar to the NI and<br />

was well tolerated.<br />

FUNDING: CN Creative, a subsidiary of Nicoventures Holdings Ltd<br />

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: David Lawson, CN Creative Ltd, 48 Grafton Street,<br />

Manchester, M13 9XX, United Kingdom, Phone: +44 (0)845 527 6115, Email:<br />

david.lawson@cncbio.com<br />

POS1-25<br />

QUIT & FIT: A PILOT TRIAL FOR SMOKING CESSATION AND<br />

EXERCISE PROMOTION AMONG URBAN AFRICAN-AMERICAN<br />

WOMEN<br />

Cassandra A. Stanton, PhD 1,2 , Ashley Huderson, PhD 2 , Bryan Kim, PhD 2 , Jennifer<br />

Sween Hicks, MS 2 , Kepher Makambi, PhD 2 , Lucile L. Adams-Campbell, PhD 2 ,<br />

Teletia R. Taylor, PhD 3 , Carla D. Williams, PhD 3 , 1 Westat, 2 Georgetown University<br />

Medical Center, 3 Howard University Cancer Center<br />

Women are 4 times more likely than men to report fear of weight gain as a reason<br />

for smoking cessation relapse and they gain significantly more weight than male<br />

smokers post-quit. African American (AA) women report less tolerance for postcessation<br />

weight gain and despite lower overall smoking rates have comparable<br />

lung cancer rates to higher smoking groups. Exercise combined with smoking<br />

cessation can yield better cessation outcomes, yet trials to-date have not included<br />

sufficient numbers of urban minority women. This study sought to examine how<br />

a targeted program to promote healthy energy balance through exercise could<br />

improve smoking cessation among urban AA women. In a pilot RCT, the feasibility<br />

and acceptability of Quit & Fit, a 12-week smoking and exercise intervention<br />

targeted to AA women, was examined. Participants were randomly assigned to<br />

either a control group (SC; cessation intervention) or the Quit & Fit group (QF;<br />

cessation plus 12-week exercise intervention). All participants received 12 weeks<br />

of cessation counseling via telephone along with 9-weeks of NRT – lozenges).<br />

The QF group also received objective weight measurement and 12-weeks of<br />

structured supervised aerobic activities in a university affiliated community-based<br />

research center. Outcome was CO biochemically confirmed 7-day intent-to-treat<br />

abstinence post-intervention (3-months from baseline). Of the 98 screened, 28%<br />

lacked interest in quitting, 32% were excluded due to contraindications with NRT<br />

or exercise, and 39% (N=38, mean age 51y/o) were enrolled. Adherence to 50%<br />

of the phone sessions was higher in the SC group (SC 44% N=8; QF 20% N=4).<br />

At 3-month follow-up, 35% (N=7) of the QF group reported verified abstinence<br />

compared to 16% (N=3) of controls. In the QF program, those who attended 3-6<br />

weeks of the exercise sessions had an average 10 lb. weight reduction. Program<br />

satisfaction was higher in the QF group (70%, N=14) compared to SC (44%, N=8).<br />

While improving adherence to phone calls needs further study, the Quit & Fit<br />

program was found to be feasible to deliver, acceptable to participants interested<br />

in quitting, and more than doubled the abstinence rates in this pilot.<br />

FUNDING: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National<br />

Cancer Institute (P30CA051008).<br />

JUSTIFICATION: Results of this pilot trial suggest there may be great promise in<br />

multiple health outcome interventions to address healthy behavior change among<br />

the leading lifestyle contributors to morbidity and mortality among minority and<br />

low-income women in this country.<br />

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Cassandra Stanton, Westat & Georgetown<br />

Univieristy 1600 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850, United States,<br />

Phone: 401-559-5534, Email: CAS337@GEORGETOWN.EDU<br />

POS1-26<br />

GENDER DIFFERENCES AMONG HIV-INFECTED SMOKERS<br />

Brittlyn K. Pearlman, BS 1 , Cassandra A. Stanton, PhD 2 , Andrea H. Weinberger,<br />

PhD 3 , Jonathan Shuter, MD* 1 , 1 Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College<br />

of Medicine, 2 Georgetown University Medical Center, 3 Ferkauf Graduate School of<br />

Psychology/Yeshiva University,<br />

Introduction: Persons living with HIV (PLWH) in the US smoke at triple the<br />

rates of the general population. With advances in HIV care, tobacco has emerged<br />

as a leading cause of mortality. In the general population, gender differences in<br />

smoking behaviors are well-described, but little is known about the extent to which<br />

demographic, clinical, or psychosocial correlates of smoking differ between men<br />

and women living with HIV.<br />

Methods: Positively Smoke Free (PSF) is an intensive, behavioral tobacco<br />

treatment delivered by group therapy or over the web. We analyzed merged data<br />

from two prospective trials of PSF for this study. All subjects were current smokers<br />

117<br />

392

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!