25.01.2016 Views

CONTACT WITH POETS

Ev4Qw3

Ev4Qw3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

writing would automatically know that it was okay. I’d want to know<br />

about it simply because I’d want to know about it, but it didn’t really cross<br />

my mind that anybody might be slowed down or discouraged by my not<br />

making that opportunity explicit.<br />

That said, my next project (a sampling of which was recently<br />

published by your No Press) has been registered with Creative Commons<br />

to formalize its stand against the policies and machinations of the Facebook<br />

corporation. That project, working under the running title of Exquisite<br />

Corp, emerged from a simultaneous disgust with the privacy policies<br />

of the Facebook corporation and with witnessing the illegal police activities<br />

in Toronto during the G8/G20 rallies. The thing that struck me about<br />

both of those events—both of which erode privacy and citizenship—is<br />

that they are encoded with a banality, as if we’ve all grown accommodated<br />

to such impingements. Creative Commons and the Copyleft movement is<br />

part of the development of a third way that is an alternative to the eternal<br />

stalemate of either being inside the system and changed by it or else outside<br />

the system and irrelevant to it. I am always looking for new ways of<br />

sharing language and ideas without contradicting the openness of language.<br />

The use of explicitly already-written language in plunderverse or<br />

appropriative language to speak or to write seems to access an alternative<br />

and new solution to this problem. Language works within a system that<br />

constantly recycles shared words, even ideas and feelings, but the system<br />

falters when somebody attempts to arrest the flow. The problem, as Derrida<br />

outlined a while ago, is fundamental to language and makes our proprietary<br />

rules on language-use absurd: “There would be no cause for concern<br />

if one were rigorously assured of being able to distinguish with rigor<br />

between a citation and a non-citation.” I think we cite in academic papers<br />

because the identity of the authors and the history of the specific texts<br />

(including such editorial backroom mechanics as editions, versions, trans-<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!