03.02.2016 Views

2016-2017

1PSJ98W

1PSJ98W

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Economic Development<br />

New York State and its local governments currently spend approximately $8 billion annually on a<br />

broad array of economic development programs throughout the state (see chart on next page).<br />

There are dozens of different economic development programs intended to provide a myriad of<br />

benefits such as cash grants, tax exemptions, tax credits (including many that are refundable and<br />

paid in cash), and tax-exempt bonds. The vast majority of these benefits go to big businesses in<br />

the name of job creation and economic growth, but the results leave much to be desired.<br />

Research on the programs in question reveals that we are not getting a good return on our<br />

investment. For example, a detailed study of New York’s business tax credits prepared in 2013 by<br />

economists Donald Boyd and Marilyn Rubin noted that “there is no conclusive evidence from<br />

research studies conducted since the mid-1950s to show that business tax incentives have an<br />

impact on net economic gains to the states above and beyond the level that would have been<br />

attained absent the incentives.”<br />

Transparency and accountability are also a serious issue. Tax reduction measures enacted last<br />

year reflected both extremes of the spectrum. On the positive side, Empire State Development<br />

(ESD) will now be required to submit an annual report in connection with the commercial<br />

production tax credit that indicates the name of each production company receiving the credit, the<br />

amount of the credit, the estimated number of employees, and the amount of credit-eligible wages<br />

paid. At the other extreme, the proposal appearing on legislators’ desks on the very last day of the<br />

session included both a yacht and a private jet sales tax credit, measures that had not been<br />

mentioned in the Executive Budget nor publicly discussed in the final weeks of the session.<br />

Similarly, numerous audits from the Office of the State Comptroller (OSC) also question whether<br />

the state is getting its money’s worth from Industrial Development Agencies (IDA). 27 A 2013<br />

report from OSC revealed that of the 4,486 current IDA projects, 1,161 do not promise to create a<br />

single job. Sixty-eight percent of the 407 IDA projects that ended in 2011 lost jobs, did not create<br />

jobs, or did not meet their job creation targets, falling a total of 32,153 jobs below their targets.<br />

More recent audits have found deficiencies in IDA processes related to approving projects,<br />

monitoring the project performance against goals, and recouping benefits from projects that failed<br />

to meet promised economic and job targets. Several audits also highlighted deficiencies in the<br />

monitoring of the tax exemptions given to IDA projects or the PILOTs the projects were required<br />

to pay to local governments and school districts in lieu of forgone property taxes. This is<br />

particularly troubling given that local governments and school districts are being squeezed by the<br />

state’s local property tax cap.<br />

27<br />

Industrial Development Agencies (IDAs) are public benefit corporations authorized under state law and intended to<br />

encourage and subsidize private business investment in order to enhance job opportunities, general prosperity, and the<br />

economic welfare of the people of the state, and in particular of the people of the locale where it is located. Currently,<br />

there are 115 active IDAs in New York.<br />

28 | Fiscal Policy Institute

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!