07.02.2016 Views

A Concise History of the United States of America (2012)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 A <strong>Concise</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>America</strong><br />

part, environmental. Despite <strong>the</strong> instructions issued by <strong>the</strong> company to<br />

<strong>the</strong> original settlers in 1606 that <strong>the</strong>y should not “plant in a low or moist<br />

place,” Jamestown was poorly sited for health, and especially deadly in<br />

<strong>the</strong> summer months. Yet <strong>the</strong> remarkable fact is that <strong>the</strong> high mortality<br />

rates, and <strong>the</strong> apparent inability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colonists to extract sustenance, let<br />

alone wealth, from this land that had seemed to promise so much was<br />

not <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> England’s early version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>America</strong>n dream; it was only<br />

<strong>the</strong> beginning.<br />

Despite all evidence from Roanoke and, later, Jamestown to <strong>the</strong> contrary,<br />

<strong>the</strong> idea prevailed in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century England<br />

that nature in <strong>the</strong> New World, if not unappreciated by its inhabitants,<br />

was certainly underexploited; that, in short, English settlers, as Hariot<br />

had suggested, could make more <strong>of</strong> it. The repercussions <strong>of</strong> this belief<br />

for <strong>the</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> English settlement were foreshadowed in a widely read<br />

work that was informed by Amerigo Vespucci’s explorations at <strong>the</strong> start<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “age <strong>of</strong> discovery” – Thomas More’s Utopia (1516). More, like<br />

Hakluyt, was concerned at <strong>the</strong> social conditions <strong>of</strong> his own time, in particular<br />

<strong>the</strong> poverty and resultant social unrest. In More’s imaginary and<br />

somewhat intimidating island utopia, removing <strong>the</strong> surplus population<br />

to some distant mainland colony was a matter <strong>of</strong> course. “Such colonies<br />

are governed by <strong>the</strong> Utopians,” <strong>the</strong> reader is advised, “but <strong>the</strong> natives<br />

allowed to join in if <strong>the</strong>y want to. When this happens, natives and colonists<br />

soon combine to form a single community with a single way <strong>of</strong> life,<br />

to <strong>the</strong> great advantage <strong>of</strong> both parties.” If, however, “<strong>the</strong> natives won’t<br />

do as <strong>the</strong>y’re told, <strong>the</strong>y’re expelled from <strong>the</strong> area marked out for annexation.”’<br />

Opposition to such exclusion, in More’s semi-fictional universe,<br />

would result in conflict. His Utopians “consider war perfectly justifiable,<br />

when one country denies ano<strong>the</strong>r its natural right to derive nourishment<br />

from any soil which <strong>the</strong> original owners are not using <strong>the</strong>mselves, but are<br />

merely holding on to as a worthless piece <strong>of</strong> property.” 9<br />

Nearly 200 years later, on <strong>the</strong> cusp <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century, English<br />

intellectuals were still contemplating <strong>the</strong>se moral and practical conundrums.<br />

When philosopher John Locke proposed, in The Second Treatise<br />

<strong>of</strong> Civil Government (1690), that “in <strong>the</strong> beginning all <strong>the</strong> world was<br />

<strong>America</strong>,” he did so in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> his broader discussion <strong>of</strong> property<br />

and <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> possession. It was labor, he argued, that both conferred<br />

value upon land and established <strong>the</strong> right to it. Without labor, land was<br />

worth nothing and, if unimproved by European standards, was simply<br />

open to all comers. “There cannot be a clearer demonstration <strong>of</strong> any<br />

thing, than several nations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>America</strong>ns are <strong>of</strong> this,” he observed,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!