20.03.2016 Views

REVOLUTION

NYR11932_SaleCat

NYR11932_SaleCat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 1 Jean-Honore Fragonard, Portrait of Madame Fragonard, the<br />

Artist’s Wife, black chalk on paper, Musée du Louvre, Paris<br />

Fig. 2 Jean-Honore Fragonard, Self-Portrait, black chalk on paper,<br />

Fondation Custodia, Frits Lugt collection, Paris<br />

Fig. 3 Jean-Honore Fragonard, Portrait of Alexander-Evariste Fragonard,<br />

the Artist’s Son, black chalk on paper, Musée du Louvre, Paris<br />

As the creator of some of the most memorable erotic imagery of the 18th century,<br />

Fragonard was long suspected of practicing a personal libertinage to match his<br />

most licentious paintings. But no hint of scandal attached to his name during his<br />

lifetime, and the critic Bachaumont’s famous barb that Fragonard “was content<br />

to distinguish himself in the boudoirs and dressing rooms” of Paris addressed<br />

not the artist’s personal morals, but his decision to work for lucrative private<br />

commissions rather than contribute to the biennial Salon. Indeed, the criticism<br />

came in August 1769, only two months after Fragonard married Marie-Anne<br />

Gérard (1745-1823), a talented miniaturist from his native Grasse, in the church of<br />

Saint-Lambert in Paris; the frst of their two children, Rosalie, was born six months<br />

later. By all accounts, it was a companionable union and Fragonard proved himself<br />

a dedicated family man.<br />

Throughout the 1770s and early 1780s, Fragonard produced a series of paintings,<br />

drawings and watercolors that depict joyful couples, engaged parents, devoted<br />

mothers and large and happy families (including, on occasion, the Holy Family)<br />

that seem to refect the contentment and satisfaction that he derived from his<br />

own domesticity. These compositions are remarkable – perhaps unprecedented –<br />

for the intimacy, informality and naturalism with which they portray undisguised<br />

afection among members of the modern French family.<br />

L’Heureux Ménage (‘The Happy Household’) depicts an aristocratic salon in which<br />

a pretty, fashionably dressed young mother kneels on an enormous settee, her<br />

contented gaze falling on her rambunctious little son as he fings himself across<br />

the lap of his benevolent and playful young father. The scene is opulent: the family<br />

wears fne silks and satins tailored in the height of style, the elaborately carved<br />

and gilded canapé is upholstered in green damask, an enormous gilt-framed<br />

painting on the wall behind them suggests the soaring height of the room they<br />

inhabit, and a costly, red-plumed parrot faps its wings on top of the a cage beside<br />

them. Yet Fragonard’s ‘Happy Household’ is nonetheless remarkably intimate<br />

and tender in its afect. The mother stands protectively over her family, her body<br />

leaning in to her husband’s side, her left hand resting on his shoulder, her right<br />

afectionately brushing his arm. He throws back his head, smiling joyously as he<br />

playfully wards of his little son’s eager embrace. The child propels himself into his<br />

father’s waiting arms in an efort to kiss his face.<br />

It seems likely that the addition of a son to Fragonard’s own ménage may have<br />

been a source of inspiration for the painting (fgs. 1-3). Alexandre-Evariste<br />

Fragonard (1780-1850) – who would grow up to be a painter of success and<br />

distinction - was christened in Grasse on 26 October 1780. The apparent age<br />

of the clamoring little boy in L’Heureux Ménage – seeming about three or four –<br />

coincides almost exactly with Evariste’s age in 1784 when, we can surmise with<br />

near certainty, the painting was executed.<br />

Fig. 4 Jean-Honore Fragonard, The Happy Household, Private collection<br />

Like most of Fragonard’s paintings, L’Heureux Ménage is neither signed nor<br />

dated, but a painted oil sketch representing the artist’s frst idea for the<br />

composition survives (fg. 4; private collection; formerly in the collection of M.<br />

Penard y Fernandez), and is recorded as having been exhibited in the Salon de<br />

la Correspondance in November 1783; there seems little doubt that Fragonard’s<br />

revised, meticulously fnished, fnal version of the subject – the present painting<br />

– would have been produced shortly thereafter. When it was included in the 1783<br />

exhibition, the sketch – then owned by the painter Antoine Vestier, and later by the<br />

British portraitist, Sir Thomas Lawrence – was described precisely, as “l’intérieur<br />

d’un ménage où l’on voit un père caresser son enfant en présence de la mère,<br />

esquisse” (“the interior of a household where we see a father caressing his child in<br />

the presence of its mother, sketch”).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!