28.05.2016 Views

MDM_Whitepaper_EDG_Finance

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENTITY WHITE PAPER IS EFFECTIVE DATA GOVERNANCE A CHOICE OR A NECESSITY IN FINANCIAL SERVICES TODAY?<br />

IS EFFECTIVE DATA GOVERNANCE<br />

A CHOICE OR A NECESSITY<br />

IN FINANCIAL SERVICES TODAY?<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The global banking industry is experiencing a period of uncompromising change that will<br />

permanently alter its shape, its ways of doing business, its winners and its losers.<br />

“Flowing complete, accurate, timely data to the people and processes<br />

that need it is the lifeblood of a modern organisation.”<br />

Ambuj Goyal, IBM<br />

Data Governance is the activity of co-ordinating people, processes and systems to ensure<br />

that the information that powers an enterprise is accurate and trustworthy.<br />

COST OF COMPLEXITY WITHIN BANKING SYSTEMS<br />

While the banking industry was one of the first to adopt the concepts of Enterprise Data<br />

Management, there is still a lot to do; effective Data Governance is a moving target and is<br />

still a distant dream for the vast majority of enterprises.<br />

In the last decade, the finance industry has witnessed constant mergers and acquisitions<br />

as the market has consolidated. This adds to an already complex system architecture map<br />

for most of these large organisations. Numerous legacy systems, a proliferation of product<br />

centric silos and duplicated data results in costly manual intervention and a loss of control.<br />

The integration of multiple systems over time has led to business rigidity rather than<br />

flexibility. In 2011, IBM’s Institute for Business Value estimated the cost of complexity for<br />

global banks to be $200bn.<br />

REGULATORY REFORM<br />

The 2008 financial crisis triggered an ongoing period of global and national regulatory<br />

reform. Banks are subject to a bewildering array of regulation including AML, KYC, SAMA,<br />

BASELII and Dodds-Frank and are fined huge sums for non-compliance. According to the<br />

2012 Ernst and Young survey, “Progress in Financial Services Risk Management”, the scope,<br />

timing and potential impact of regulatory reform was the top challenge noted by almost<br />

75% of respondents.<br />

Regulatory reform necessitates making risk “everyone’s business”. Modern Banking<br />

is both “data driven” and “data dependent”. It logically follows therefore that the<br />

effective management of the data in the enterprise should be everyone’s business. To<br />

truly make it so and by treating data as an “Enterprise Asset” requires an effective Data<br />

Governance programme.<br />

Regulation relating to capital requirements in banking groups (also known as regulatory<br />

capital or capital adequacy) will also create ripples along the information management<br />

supply chain. Investment banking operations are being ring-fenced, and regulators require<br />

that these operations report risk both independently and at group level. This will strain<br />

banking systems’ architecture, integration, data quality and Data Governance processes.<br />

2<br />

Failure to provide regulators with the information they require, in the format they require, when<br />

they ask for it, adds reputational risk to the plethora of risks already facing a modern bank.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!