15.08.2016 Views

Health Evidence Review Commission's Value-based Benefits Subcommittee

VbBS%20Meeting%20Materials%203-10-2016

VbBS%20Meeting%20Materials%203-10-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ESI is essential to get immediate pain relief, and get patients into PT or other active therapy.<br />

He was concerned that not covering ESI would increase opioid use.<br />

Olson and Gibson responded that VbBS decisions need to focus on the population studies<br />

rather than personal anecdote. Williams raised a concern that the larger population studies<br />

have conflicting results and that VbBS should not pick and choose what evidence to<br />

consider. Smits noted that most studies found poor evidence of effectiveness for the<br />

general population. Livingston pointed out that the AHRQ report noted that there were few<br />

patients included with acute or subacute symptoms in the studies reviewed, and therefore<br />

the AHRQ report may not reflect the population response for patients with acute/subacute<br />

pain.<br />

Hodges noted that ESI could be covered as an exception, but that she could not recall a<br />

request for an exception for ESI from a patient with acute, incapacitating back pain. Her<br />

exceptions normally involve patients with chronic back pain.<br />

Pollack requested that when the coverage guidance goes back through re-review, that HTAS<br />

or EGBS attempt to identify what subpopulations could benefit from ESI. Staff replied that<br />

this was part of the re-review process.<br />

Note: As the placement of epidural steroid injections were prioritized on the list <strong>based</strong> on<br />

the coverage guidance prior to the biennial review resulting in the “package” of changes to<br />

related to the treatment of conditions of the back and spine that are currently delayed,<br />

changes involving the placement of ESI will occur at the time of the next set of interim<br />

modifications to the list. The changes to the diagnostic guideline on advanced imaging of<br />

the back were a part of the “package” of back changes, and therefore will only go into effect<br />

once the implementation of those changes is lifted.<br />

Recommended Actions:<br />

1) Remove CPT 64483 (Injection(s), anesthetic agent and/or steroid, transforaminal<br />

epidural, with imaging guidance (fluoroscopy or CT); lumbar or sacral, single level) and<br />

64484 (each additional level) from line 407 CONDITIONS OF THE BACK AND SPINE<br />

2) Modify GN37 as shown in Appendix A<br />

3) Remove 64484 (Injection(s), anesthetic agent and/or steroid, transforaminal epidural,<br />

with imaging guidance (fluoroscopy or CT); lumbar or sacral, additional levels) from line<br />

159 HERPES ZOSTER; HERPES SIMPLEX AND WITH NEUROLOGICAL AND<br />

OPHTHALMOLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS<br />

4) Place 64483 and 64484 ((Injection(s), anesthetic agent and/or steroid, transforaminal<br />

epidural, with imaging guidance (fluoroscopy or CT); lumbar or sacral) on the Services<br />

Recommended for Non-Coverage table<br />

5) Delete guideline note 105 EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTIONS FOR LOW BACK PAIN as<br />

shown in Appendix C<br />

<strong>Value</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>Benefits</strong> <strong>Subcommittee</strong> Minutes, 1/14/2016 Page 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!