You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Yet, in M r Knightley?s<br />
r ebuke, w e see that <strong>Emma</strong>?s<br />
advantages ?of bir th,<br />
education and for tune? make<br />
it her duty to r esist using her<br />
w it at the expense of a<br />
w oman w ho is self-evidently<br />
her infer ior in all thr ee<br />
r espects.<br />
This moment on Box H ill is<br />
just one example of how<br />
<strong>Emma</strong>?s extr emely pr ivileged<br />
position in society makes it<br />
difficult for her to empathise<br />
w ith those less for tunate.<br />
<strong>Emma</strong> is unique amongst<br />
Austen?s her oines in that she<br />
does not shar e the financial<br />
insecur ity of her<br />
counter par ts in other novels.<br />
Thr oughout her w or k Austen<br />
r epeatedly explor es the<br />
position of the young w omen<br />
of the upper classes w ho<br />
possess neither for tune nor<br />
pr oper ty, and so must look to<br />
mar r iage to secur e their<br />
futur e. That Austen<br />
r epeatedly under scor es this<br />
pr ecar ious position of<br />
w omen is unsur pr ising,<br />
given that she her self (like<br />
Cather ine M or land of<br />
N or thanger Abbey) w as the<br />
daughter of a cler gyman:<br />
once he died, the Austen<br />
family home and income<br />
w ould no longer be<br />
available. To get a sense of<br />
how Austen felt about this<br />
state of affair s one only has<br />
to look to those in her novels<br />
w ho w ill inher it the family<br />
pr oper ty and for tune: the<br />
r idiculous M r Collins in<br />
Pr ide and Pr ejudice, or the<br />
selfish (and alr eady w ealthy)<br />
John Dashw ood and his<br />
dr eadful w ife in Sense and<br />
Sensibility. A pr imar y<br />
concer n for an Austen<br />
her oine is that she must<br />
make a pr udent mar r iage in<br />
or der to maintain her social<br />
position and financial<br />
secur ity, and the pr essur e<br />
for her to do so is alw ays<br />
ther e in the backgr ound.<br />
N ot so for <strong>Emma</strong>. <strong>Emma</strong><br />
" Em m a b oast s a<br />
p osi t i on ot h er<br />
Au st en h er oi n es<br />
l ack : sh e d oes<br />
n ot n eed t o<br />
m ar r y t o secu r e<br />
h er f u t u r e."<br />
boasts a position w hich<br />
other Austen her oines lack:<br />
she does not need to mar r y<br />
to secur e her futur e.<br />
Per haps it is for this r eason<br />
that <strong>Emma</strong> tr eats mar r iage<br />
as some sor t of game. We<br />
see her evident enjoyment in<br />
tr ying to pair off her pr otégé<br />
H ar r iet w ith someone<br />
capable of r aising H ar r iet?s<br />
social standing. <strong>Emma</strong><br />
means w ell of cour se, but<br />
her actions ? w hich actually<br />
thr eaten to r uin the futur e of<br />
her fr iend ? r eveal just how<br />
little she under stands the<br />
mar r iage ?game?. Yet the<br />
point is that <strong>Emma</strong> does not<br />
have to under stand, her<br />
futur e is secur e. This<br />
fr eedom is painfully set<br />
against the position of Jane<br />
Fair fax w ho does need to<br />
mar r y for secur ity, or else<br />
face sliding dow n the social<br />
scale by taking a job as a<br />
gover ness: doomed to alw ays<br />
be in the w or ld of the<br />
leisur ed elite but no longer<br />
tr uly one of them. <strong>Emma</strong>?s<br />
failur e to under stand the<br />
pr ecar iousness of Jane and<br />
H ar r iet?s positions stems<br />
fr om lack of exper ience,<br />
w hich pr ovides an<br />
explanation (if not excuse)<br />
for her actions. H ow ever ,<br />
Austen does not shy aw ay<br />
fr om addr essing <strong>Emma</strong>?s<br />
selfishness and insensitivity<br />
w hen meddling w ith the<br />
futur e pr ospects of someone<br />
like H ar r iet, meddling w hich<br />
is, to bor r ow M r Knightley?s<br />
w or ds, ?badly done indeed.?<br />
Tr uly, ther e is much to<br />
dislike in our eponymous<br />
her oine w hen w e fir st meet<br />
her. N onetheless, Austen<br />
manages to avoid cr eating a<br />
char acter no one w ill ?much<br />
like? thr ough the clever (and<br />
indeed pioneer ing) use of a<br />
nar r ative per spective w hich<br />
is lar gely limited to <strong>Emma</strong>?s<br />
point of view. By telling the<br />
stor y in this w ay, Austen is<br />
able to avoid alienating the<br />
r eader fr om her her oine,<br />
allow ing just enough<br />
empathy in or der that, w hilst<br />
w e do not condone <strong>Emma</strong>?s<br />
actions, w e r eadily for give<br />
them.<br />
This for giveness also spr ings<br />
fr om <strong>Emma</strong>?s pr ogr ession to<br />
matur ity under the guiding<br />
influence of the novel?s mor al<br />
centr e, M r Knightley. Like all<br />
Austen?s novels, this one has<br />
a love stor y at its cor e, and<br />
yet it is so much mor e than<br />
that. <strong>Emma</strong> is a stor y of<br />
self-discover y, of a young<br />
w oman?s gr ow th to matur ity,<br />
and because that young<br />
w oman is as complicated as<br />
<strong>Emma</strong> is, it is per haps the<br />
most compelling of all<br />
Austen?s novels; it cer tainly<br />
has the most inter esting<br />
her oine, if not the most<br />
likeable one.<br />
D r. Jen Su g d en<br />
w ith contr ibutions fr om<br />
Al exan d er Osb or n<br />
TH ISTLEDOWN TH EATRE | 6