- Page 1: THE PERMANENT PEOPLE’S TRIBUNAL S
- Page 4 and 5: Copyright © Pesticide Action Netwo
- Page 8 and 9: 3.5 COLLUSION AND EVASION OF CORPOR
- Page 10 and 11: 6.1.3 Violation of the Right to a S
- Page 12 and 13: 10
- Page 14 and 15: 4. The Fourth Defendant, BASF Group
- Page 16 and 17: working conditions; rights over nat
- Page 18 and 19: joint ventures, or other structures
- Page 20 and 21: The ‘Green Revolution’ and the
- Page 22 and 23: pests, farmers use more and stronge
- Page 24 and 25: countries. In the US and Europe, he
- Page 26 and 27: has permitted the patenting of gene
- Page 28 and 29: which holds several major terminato
- Page 30 and 31: new genetic material will influence
- Page 32 and 33: In 2008, talks on the AoA stalled.
- Page 34 and 35: careful attention to language using
- Page 36 and 37: 3 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE ACTS O
- Page 38 and 39: conditional right, while the right
- Page 40 and 41: intergenerational impacts of pestic
- Page 42 and 43: Summary Agrochemical TNCs profit fr
- Page 44 and 45: Certain practices have particularly
- Page 46 and 47: for preventive action and policies
- Page 48 and 49: their ability to feed themselves. T
- Page 50 and 51: Rights of indigenous peoples Indige
- Page 52 and 53: The right to know In 2000, the Spec
- Page 54 and 55: ‘corporations’ to promote and p
- Page 56 and 57:
presented here demonstrates how chi
- Page 58 and 59:
money, the government subsidises pr
- Page 60 and 61:
livelihood of more than 80 per cent
- Page 62 and 63:
partnerships, ‘revolving doors’
- Page 64 and 65:
which, complicity with the perpetra
- Page 66 and 67:
Among his Washington clients was Mo
- Page 68 and 69:
3.5.4.1 Dow and the Bhopal tragedy
- Page 70 and 71:
When buying UCC, Dow claimed it was
- Page 72 and 73:
The EPA re-registered atrazine as a
- Page 74 and 75:
Violation of rights The collusion a
- Page 76 and 77:
4 SPECIFIC CASES OF THE WRONGFUL AC
- Page 78 and 79:
ability to bind to soils and long h
- Page 80 and 81:
Treatment for poisoning is hampered
- Page 82 and 83:
in LMICs Syngenta has enabled gross
- Page 84 and 85:
lakes and rivers. Drinking water co
- Page 86 and 87:
10.814/2003 prohibited planting of
- Page 88 and 89:
4.1.4 OTHER CASES AGAINST SYNGENTA
- Page 90 and 91:
The biotechnology industry argues t
- Page 92 and 93:
or the transgenic corn in Mexico. R
- Page 94 and 95:
cooking. 347 It can self-pollinate,
- Page 96 and 97:
y the Indian Council of Medical Res
- Page 98 and 99:
Bt cotton farmers usually buy their
- Page 100 and 101:
post mortem although histo-patholog
- Page 102 and 103:
seeds, or other confidential terms.
- Page 104 and 105:
y taking extreme measures, these wo
- Page 106 and 107:
4.2.5 OTHER CASES AGAINST MONSANTO
- Page 108 and 109:
4.3.1.1 Endosulfan Poisoning, Kasar
- Page 110 and 111:
Balakrishnan, aged 14, was diagnose
- Page 112 and 113:
EXPERIENCES OF AFRICAN FARMERS WITH
- Page 114 and 115:
4.3.1.5 Collusion between, endosulf
- Page 116 and 117:
clothianidin, which it launched on
- Page 118 and 119:
Testimony from beekeeper in the UK
- Page 120 and 121:
of the illegal contamination, and o
- Page 122 and 123:
claimed they could not find suffici
- Page 124 and 125:
The marketing practices failed to m
- Page 126 and 127:
The payments expedited registration
- Page 128 and 129:
workers. 591 Thousands of workers l
- Page 130 and 131:
driving the adoption of Roundup Rea
- Page 132 and 133:
4.6.2 BASF AND GENETICALLY-ENGINEER
- Page 134 and 135:
4.6.3 OTHER CASES AGAINST BASF BASF
- Page 136 and 137:
4.7.1.3 POPs accumulation threatens
- Page 138 and 139:
top of the bioaccumulation and biom
- Page 140 and 141:
By the 1990s all uses of aldrin, di
- Page 142 and 143:
I remember planes flying overhead a
- Page 144 and 145:
also cause birth defects, cancer, a
- Page 146 and 147:
information under the headings: cla
- Page 148 and 149:
chemicals without being fully aware
- Page 150 and 151:
4.7.4.1 Kamukhaan: A poisoned villa
- Page 152 and 153:
Testimonies from Kamukhaan 741 Edga
- Page 154 and 155:
nausea, panic attacks and other emo
- Page 156 and 157:
toxic sites often complain of heada
- Page 158 and 159:
No action had been taken to protect
- Page 160 and 161:
Pesticide Carcinogenicity Other US
- Page 162 and 163:
of OPs was 0.2278 mg/l; for OCs it
- Page 164 and 165:
distribution of non-milled GM food,
- Page 166 and 167:
In 1996, the EU put a moratorium on
- Page 168 and 169:
ecause of the likelihood of it ente
- Page 170 and 171:
Carman of Australia was threatened
- Page 172 and 173:
In 2002, the faculty in his departm
- Page 174 and 175:
products with insufficient informat
- Page 176 and 177:
HISTORY OF HARASSMENT 1993 Hoechst
- Page 178 and 179:
The counter-affidavits said the hea
- Page 180 and 181:
The wage rates for children are agr
- Page 182 and 183:
5 LAWS VIOLATED The defendant corpo
- Page 184 and 185:
The African Charter on Human and Pe
- Page 186 and 187:
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
- Page 188 and 189:
5.3 CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS Righ
- Page 190 and 191:
Article 11.2 of the above Conventio
- Page 192 and 193:
Later general obligations under the
- Page 194 and 195:
3. Assess and address in decision-m
- Page 196 and 197:
6 THE VERDICT 6.1 THE FACTS - ANALY
- Page 198 and 199:
• The exposure to multiple pestic
- Page 200 and 201:
their food sources and their buildi
- Page 202 and 203:
The dominant public opinion, influe
- Page 204 and 205:
As a result, the room for the prote
- Page 206 and 207:
they made to develop it. When enoug
- Page 208 and 209:
de facto document ‘beyond any rea
- Page 210 and 211:
The imagery of corporate global cit
- Page 212 and 213:
6.3.4 APPROACHES TO GLOBAL JUSTICE
- Page 214 and 215:
• The Tribunal further finds that
- Page 216 and 217:
6.5 reCOMMENDATIONS The specific st
- Page 218 and 219:
APPENDIX 1 PROGRAMME OF PRESENTATIO
- Page 220 and 221:
APPENDIX 2 THE JURISTS The jury was
- Page 222 and 223:
THE ROLE OF THE STATE VIS-À-VIS CO
- Page 224 and 225:
14. Reality on the ground. The poli
- Page 226 and 227:
20. Then, came the treaties: The In
- Page 228 and 229:
The Norms have received concerted o
- Page 230 and 231:
placed in a position to cause harm
- Page 232 and 233:
are most stark in Kasargod, Kerala,
- Page 234 and 235:
In the case of the Liberty Link ric
- Page 236 and 237:
APPENDIX 5 WITNESS STATEMENTS The f
- Page 238 and 239:
injection of nucleic acid into cell
- Page 240 and 241:
cotton use, mirids were not a probl
- Page 242 and 243:
in Paraguay where there is a lot of
- Page 244 and 245:
pregnant women’s blood. 3-MPPA an
- Page 246 and 247:
eceive a letter from the FDA at the
- Page 248 and 249:
is disseminated amongst community m
- Page 250 and 251:
provide an effective sui generis sy
- Page 252 and 253:
UPOV is being pushed as the ‘effe
- Page 254 and 255:
APPENDIX 5.3 WITNESS STATEMENT GMO
- Page 256 and 257:
What are the health impacts of RR s
- Page 258 and 259:
Why are they using this strategy? A
- Page 260 and 261:
APPENDIX 5.4 WITNESS STATEMENT THE
- Page 262 and 263:
APPENDIX 5.5 WITNESS STATEMENT THE
- Page 264 and 265:
The militants of Via Campesina thou
- Page 266 and 267:
are not manufactured in the Arctic,
- Page 268 and 269:
APPENDIX 5.7 WITNESS STATEMENT NEON
- Page 270 and 271:
Ban in Germany and Italy In May 200
- Page 272 and 273:
Conclusion The fact that Bayer cont
- Page 274 and 275:
Absence of moles In Spring 2000, I
- Page 276 and 277:
APPENDIX 5.9 WITNESS STATEMENT HARA
- Page 278 and 279:
APPENDIX 5.10 WITNESS STATEMENT THE
- Page 280 and 281:
APPENDIX 5.11 WITNESS STATEMENT CHI
- Page 282 and 283:
APPENDIX 6 FORTY WRITTEN SUBMISSION
- Page 284 and 285:
16. Bayer Germany India (Kasargod)
- Page 286 and 287:
32. Syngenta, Dow, BASF USA, German
- Page 288 and 289:
GEF Gm GMO HCH HIPc Hrdc Ht HYV IAA
- Page 292:
About PAN Pesticide Action Network