22.10.2016 Views

Ocmix

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RobairReport<br />

NET WORTH<br />

By Gino Robair<br />

The best class I had during graduate school<br />

in the mid-’80s was a composition seminar<br />

taught by American composer Pauline Oliveros.<br />

Known for her innovative use of sine-wave<br />

generators and tape delays two decades earlier, as well as her influential<br />

Deep Listening and sonic awareness aesthetics, I expected to spend several<br />

months exploring advanced and heady concepts. But to my surprise,<br />

the course’s direction proved to be more mundane and practical.<br />

“You’re going to learn to write a grant.”<br />

Right. Here we were in one of the country’s leading institutions supporting<br />

the experimental music tradition—graced by the likes of John<br />

Cage, Henry Cowell, Lou Harrison and Robert Ashley, among many<br />

others—and we were going to talk about money. Of course, we all knew<br />

that grants were the main means of financial support for the arts in the<br />

U.S., so it seemed like a reasonable topic to dig into. Each student was<br />

asked to propose a project and follow it all the way through, from design<br />

to realization.<br />

Yet the real eye-opener was something very specific that Oliveros<br />

pointed out as we discussed the myriad things that should be included<br />

in every project budget.<br />

The key to success, now,<br />

is to bring something to<br />

the table that simply cannot<br />

be found elsewhere,<br />

at any price.<br />

“Figure out what your time is worth,” she<br />

said. “Then, include an amount in the budget<br />

that takes into account the number of hours you<br />

will invest in the project.”<br />

Time stood still after I heard that. You mean<br />

I can pay myself for being an artist?<br />

But then it hit me: I had no idea where to begin.<br />

Up to that point, I had been a member of the musician’s union in the<br />

Inland Empire, so I understood what scale was for a percussionist doing<br />

various “services,” and I knew what I was able to get per hour working<br />

odd jobs. But as a single person doing what he loves most—how do you<br />

put a price on that?<br />

Three decades later—with a family, a mortgage in the Bay Area, and a<br />

kid in college—it’s much easier to figure out what my time is worth, even<br />

for my own projects. The challenge that remains, however, is the ability<br />

to convince others of that value. And this cuts to the core of the current<br />

crisis in the creative community, whether you’re a writer, musician, artist<br />

or engineer, because what we think we are worth might not match<br />

what the market is willing to pay.<br />

So while the average consumer is happy to spend a few bucks on<br />

specialized coffee drinks, nearly everyone in the entertainment business<br />

is having to justify the reasonable amount they ask in remuneration<br />

for a project.<br />

A recent example, though not an isolated one: A colleague of mine<br />

who records concerts was recently hired by a band to capture a gig using<br />

a stereo pair of mics placed a few feet from the stage. After setting<br />

up and doing the soundcheck, the leader of the opening act inquired if<br />

his band could also be recorded—for free—since the mics were already<br />

in place. The engineer politely said no, to which the band leader asked—<br />

you guessed it—if he could split the other band’s bill with them. But the<br />

engineer stuck to her guns and reminded the guy that she needs to earn<br />

an hourly wage for her work, just as he does, and she would be happy to<br />

record his group for the same amount she was charging the other band.<br />

At least he wasn’t able to use the old “do it for exposure” line.<br />

FAIR TRADE<br />

The difficulty today for studios and engineers is figuring out how to keep<br />

from pricing ourselves out of existence as project budgets decrease. Where<br />

I come from, the main tactic in negotiations is to shoot high, let them<br />

lowball you, and then haggle until a satisfactory price has been achieved.<br />

In the age of the Internet, however, that can be<br />

a dangerous strategy to employ: It’s easier than<br />

ever to find what you want at a lower cost using<br />

your Web browser. Consequently, the key to success,<br />

now, is to bring something to the table that<br />

simply cannot be found elsewhere, at any price.<br />

This came up recently with a project I bid on:<br />

I did my due diligence and soon realized that I<br />

had a particular skill set and set of tools that was difficult to beat within<br />

my geographical location. So I made a proposal that seemed fair considering<br />

the amount of time the gig would take, though (as they made<br />

clear) a bit higher than they had expected.<br />

What made this particular situation easier than usual was that I already<br />

had a full schedule and didn’t need the gig, which I made clear to<br />

the other party— a nice position to be in when negotiating. Remarkably,<br />

the offer was accepted immediately.<br />

Of course, we’re not always in the catbird seat when job hunting, but<br />

the takeaway is to know what your time is really worth at the start, by<br />

analyzing your expenses, expectations and other personal needs. From<br />

there, you can negotiate based on how critical the job is for you at the<br />

time. Although you may not always get the gig you want, when you do,<br />

you’ll know how close you are to getting exactly what you need. n<br />

64<br />

MIX | OCTOBER 2015 | mixonline.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!