n?u=RePEc:zwi:uconnr:04&r=dev

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table A-23. OLS Regression Estimates for the Proportion of Groundnut Production Area in HYRVs: (1) BEN and C_IN Variable Coefficient Estimate Standard Error BEN 0.1420*** 0.0456 C_IN 0.1330** 0.0525 HHH_AGE 0.0008 0.0015 HHH_MALE 0.0678 0.0685 MSTAT_MARIED -0.0139 0.1311 MSTAT_WIDO -0.0480 0.1339 RESP_MALE 0.0385 0.0438 EDU_PRIM 0.0649 0.0600 EDU_SEC 0.0063 0.0690 EDU_TERT 0.1356 0.0835 SUB_DIST_11 0.4052*** 0.0657 SUB_DIST_13 0.1094 0.0672 SUB_DIST_21 0.3954*** 0.0683 SUB_DIST_23 -0.0921 0.0766 SUB_DIST_31 -0.3834*** 0.0689 SUB_DIST_32 0.1514* 0.0913 SUB_DIST_51 -0.3209*** 0.0789 FAM_SIZE -0.0053 0.0051 TOT_ACRES_CULT -0.0015 0.0077 _cons 0.2735* 0.1614 F (17, 358) 14.92*** R 2 0.445 N 373 Note: *, P < 0.10; **, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.01. 47
Table A-24. OLS Regression Estimates for the Proportion of Groundnut Production Area in HYRVs: (2) Project Village (PV) Variable Coefficient Estimate Standard Error PV 0.1389*** 0.0427 HHH_AGE 0.0008 0.0015 HHH_MALE 0.0683 0.0684 MSTAT_MARIED -0.0134 0.1308 MSTAT_WIDO -0.0469 0.1336 RESP_MALE 0.0373 0.0433 EDU_PRIM 0.0648 0.0599 EDU_SEC 0.0066 0.0689 EDU_TERT 0.1361 0.0834 SUB_DIST_11 0.4046*** 0.0656 SUB_DIST_13 0.1095 0.0671 SUB_DIST_21 0.3950*** 0.0681 SUB_DIST_23 -0.0921 0.0765 SUB_DIST_31 -0.3840*** 0.0687 SUB_DIST_32 0.1513* 0.0912 SUB_DIST_51 -0.3216*** 0.0787 FAM_SIZE -0.0053 0.0051 TOT_ACRES_CULT -0.0015 0.0077 _cons 0.2718* 0.1610 F (18, 354) 15.97*** R 2 0.445 N 373 Note: *, P < 0.10; **, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.01. 48
Page 1 and 2: Zwick Center for Food and Resource
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents I. Background & M
Page 5 and 6: These varieties offer a less risky
Page 7 and 8: new technologies does not directly
Page 9 and 10: Another important characteristic of
Page 11 and 12: sub-counties. Then, three farmer as
Page 13 and 14: in 2014 and in 2004. The BEN group
Page 15 and 16: grown vary across regions with grou
Page 17 and 18: Table 2. Varieties of Groundnuts Gr
Page 19 and 20: Another important consideration in
Page 21 and 22: ii. Adoption of HYRVs 100 % of G’
Page 23 and 24: In all other cases, where the C_OUT
Page 25 and 26: A key hypothesis associated with th
Page 27 and 28: saved seed rather than purchased se
Page 29 and 30: BEN tended to experience the greate
Page 31 and 32: References Adeogun, O. A., A. M. Aj
Page 33 and 34: Godfray, H. Charles J., John R. Bed
Page 35 and 36: =handbook+of+development+economics+
Page 37 and 38: Appendix A. Additional Tables and F
Page 39 and 40: Table A-2. Sex of Survey Respondent
Page 41 and 42: Table A-8. Average Total Area Culti
Page 43 and 44: Table A-11. Crops Ranked by Income
Page 45 and 46: Table A-14. Groundnut Growers in 20
Page 47 and 48: Table A-17. Training in Groundnut P
Page 49: Table A-22. Dissemination of New Va
Page 53 and 54: Table A-26. Instrumental Variables:
Page 55 and 56: Table A-28. Market Access Problems
Page 57 and 58: Table A-30. Groundnut Storage Numbe
Page 59 and 60: Table A-35. Change from Feedback on
Page 61 and 62: Table A-38. Removal of Aflatoxin Co
Page 63 and 64: Table A-40. Do Buyers Prefer Aflato
Page 65 and 66: Table A-43. Primary Method of Dryin
Page 67 and 68: Figure 2-A. Common Support for PSM
Page 69 and 70: Name of Respondent from ATU Survey:
Page 71 and 72: 16. How has your standard of living
Page 73 and 74: HH ID#____________________ 23. If Y
Page 75 and 76: HH ID#____________________ Code for
Page 77 and 78: HH ID#____________________ Total La
Page 79 and 80: D. AFLATOXIN. 50. Ever heard of AFL

n?u=RePEc:zwi:uconnr:04&r=dev

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?