2016 | BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATION AND EFFECTIVENESS

Recommendations

Info

Has a good relationship with major investors 54 % 55 % 48 % 42 % 41 % 32 % 24 28 26 % 28 23 28 % % 25 19 % 17 % 39 % 40 % 33 % 34 29 % 27 % 4 % 7% Gives direct, personal, and constructive feedback to 5 % 5 % 2 % 2 % 2 % fellow directors Full Sample 23 % Very much 49 % Full Sample 37 % Very much 43 % Somewhat 27 % Not at all Somewhat 19 % Not at all 40 35 % 23 % 25 % 56 % 48 % 67 % 12 % 6 % Public Private Male Female Public Private Male Female Company Company Director Director Company Company Director Director Very much Somewhat Not at all Very much Somewhat Not at all Gives direct, personal, and constructive feedback to Has a high level of trust in management management Full Sample Full Sample 57 % 68 % Very much Very much 38 % 29 % Somewhat 5 % Not at all Somewhat 2 % Not at all 38 % 29 % 69 % 68 71 63 58 % 61 % 56 % 52 % Public Private Male Female Public Private Male Female Company Company Director Director Company Company Director Director Very much Somewhat Not at all Very much Somewhat Not at all 2016 | BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATION AND EFFECTIVENESS 12
42 % 43 38 41 % 37 % 36 % 38 % 40 % 26 % 57 % 45 48 % 45 % 38 % % Has a high level of trust among board members Has planned for a CEO succession 37 30 25 23 % % 23 10 % 26 % 26 % 5 17 % 5 18 % 3 % % Full Sample Full Sample 68 % 37 % Very much Very much 28 % 37 % Somewhat Somewhat 4 % 25 % Not at all Not at all 48 % 45 % 34 % 20 % 22 % 21 % 21 % 21 % 7 3 7 % % 3 % % 59 % Public Private Male Female Public Private Male Female Company Company Director Director Company Company Director Director 71 % 75 % Very much Somewhat Not at all Very much Somewhat Not at all Has designed an appropriate CEO compensation package Full Sample 66 % Very much 28 % Somewhat 5 % Not at all Has planned for board turnover Full Sample 34 % Very much 46 % Somewhat 20 % Not at all 45 % 45 % 48 % 38 % Public Private Male Female Public Private Male Female Company Company Director Director Company Company Director Director 74 % 70 % Very much Somewhat Not at all Very much Somewhat Not at all 2016 | BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATION AND EFFECTIVENESS 13
Page 1 and 2: 2016 | BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATIO
Page 3 and 4: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS
Page 5 and 6: say 1 director, 18 percent say 2 di
Page 7 and 8: Review of Findings 1. What is the t
Page 9 and 10: 8. Do you believe your board should
Page 11 and 12: 12. In general, how would you rate
Page 13: 16. How would you rate your board a
Page 17 and 18: Onboarding of new directors Full Sa
Page 19 and 20: Board member(s) do not express thei
Page 21 and 22: 19. Does your board regularly evalu
Page 23 and 24: 24. To what extent do you agree wit
Page 25 and 26: 27. Is there anything else that you
Page 27 and 28: 4. What is the industrial sector of
Page 29 and 30: ABOUT THE AUTHORS (CONT) TAYLOR GRI

2016 | BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATION AND EFFECTIVENESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?