16.12.2016 Views

Housing Stability Council

121616_Meeting-Material-Packet

121616_Meeting-Material-Packet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

October 7, 2016<br />

Oregon <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Minutes<br />

Consent Calendar for Approval:<br />

<strong>Council</strong> member Motion Yes No Abstain Excused<br />

Tammy Baney<br />

X<br />

Aubre Dickson 2 nd X<br />

Mike Fieldman X X<br />

Anna Geller<br />

X<br />

Zee Koza<br />

X<br />

Acting Chair, Adolph “Val” Valfre<br />

X<br />

Vote: 5:0:0:1 | PASS<br />

9% LIHTC and HOME NOFA Approvals – Julie Cody, Assistant Director, <strong>Housing</strong> Finance &<br />

Natasha Detweiler, <strong>Housing</strong> Finance Policy Analyst<br />

Ms. Cody reminded the <strong>Council</strong> that the 9% LIHTC and HOME NOFAs are the two largest<br />

multifamily NOFAs that are put out by the agency on an annual basis. This is a large and<br />

complex process that is competitive. She told the <strong>Council</strong> that this year the programs were<br />

oversubscribed and that for every one approval there were 5 that did not receive funding. The<br />

scoring took into account the updates approved by this <strong>Council</strong> in the QAP.<br />

For clarity and to make it easier to follow the presentation Ms. Cody and her team opted to break<br />

the NOFAs into 4 sub sections: HOME NOFA; LIHTC NOFA – Balance of State; LIHTC<br />

NOFA – Non-Metro Participating Jurisdiction Region; LIHTC NOFA – Metro Region.<br />

For the HOME NOFA, 3 applications were received and 2 are recommended for funding, one of<br />

which is for preservation.<br />

For the LIHTC NOFA – all regions, 31 applications were received and 11 are being<br />

recommended for funding of which 3 are for preservation additionally four of the projects are<br />

also HOME projects.<br />

Ms. Cody provided some additional information on the With regards to preservation, 31% of all<br />

recommended projects are preservation, 26% of the LIHTC funds are going to preservation<br />

projects, 28% of the LIHTC units are in preservation projects and 64% of the preservation units<br />

are targeting the elderly and disabled populations.<br />

Ms. Cody showed the <strong>Council</strong> a map of the projects to highlight the statewide distribution of the<br />

recommended projects. She also reviewed the threshold and competitive scoring tables. She also<br />

named and thanked the members of the scoring committee and the process by which they<br />

reached the project consensus scores. She also reviewed the manner in which any leftover funds<br />

were allocated.<br />

Ms. Cody briefed the <strong>Council</strong> on the process for presentation for each of the projects: each<br />

project will be presented individually. Ms. Detweiler will direct you to the page in the packet<br />

where the motion can be found for each project. The <strong>Council</strong> will be asked to make the motion<br />

and then to vote for each project. Ms. Detweiler will start with the HOME NOFA approvals and<br />

then move on to the LIHTC NOFA approvals (these will be presented by region).<br />

Page 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!