Liverpool Law Jan 2017
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PI <strong>Law</strong> Reform<br />
PI <strong>Law</strong> Reform Wolf in MOJ<br />
Consultation Sheeps’ Clothing<br />
The MOJ have released the consultation that the personal injury industry have been waiting for since<br />
George Osborne’s 2015 Autumn Statement (see website link details below). The consultation entitled<br />
“Reforming the Soft Tissue Injury “Whiplash” Claims Process” required a response by the 6th<br />
<strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2017</strong>. Kirsty McKno outlines the proposals and the Society’s reponse...<br />
Despite a number of representations to the MOJ with regard to the<br />
unreasonableness of the consultation period in view of the<br />
significance of the proposed changes and intervening Christmas<br />
period, including from <strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society, it has been confirmed<br />
that there is no intention to extend that period. The MOJ are<br />
working to a timeline around the legislative change that will be<br />
required if the proposals go ahead. This means that they wish to<br />
release their own response during April. Part 8 of the consultation<br />
specifically concerns implementation and confirms that it will be “as<br />
soon as possible”.<br />
George Osborne had originally stated that the intention behind the<br />
reform was to both reduce fraud and create a saving to private<br />
insurance premiums of £40 per annum. Interestingly the focus of the<br />
consultation is based more upon the saving that would be passed to<br />
policy holders from Insurers as a result of their making lower<br />
compensation payments rather than the costs of fraud. Those lower<br />
payments will be achieved by either removing the right to<br />
compensation for “whiplash” altogether or introducing a tariff<br />
where an injury of up to 6 months would attract an award of £400<br />
with an additional £25 payment for any psychiatric elements. The<br />
model extends up to a 24 month injury for which £3500 would be<br />
received although the definition of “whiplash” is yet to be defined.<br />
In addition to reduction by value of award there will be a reduction<br />
in volume achieved through raising the small claims limit for injury<br />
to £5000.<br />
There are far more points to be made about the proposal than this<br />
article permits many of which Capital Economics and Matthew<br />
Maxwell-Scott of Slater & Gordon <strong>Law</strong>yers were able to explain at a<br />
meeting held for <strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society members on 15th<br />
December. They presented information relating to the empirical data<br />
upon which the consultation has been based and that disproves for<br />
example that the costs of injury claims are £40 per annum and that<br />
raising the small claims limit would have unintended consequences<br />
that include the removal of access to justice for victims of<br />
employer’s liability and public liability claims. Capital Economics<br />
have engaged in surveys that are able to demonstrate the serious<br />
financial impact to Merseyside not just by the loss of legal jobs but<br />
in the loss of work for those businesses that provide services to the<br />
legal industry.<br />
Despite a number of representations<br />
to the MOJ with regard to the<br />
unreasonableness of the consultation<br />
period in view of the significance of<br />
the proposed changes and<br />
intervening Christmas period,<br />
including from <strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society,<br />
it has been confirmed that there is no<br />
intention to extend that period.<br />
<strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society represent both Claimant and Defendant<br />
lawyers and it was good to see Defendant presence at the discussion.<br />
The consultation is not just a Claimant issue but one that will<br />
impact the industry as a whole and we are working to ensure that a<br />
broad spectrum of views are canvassed and represented in our<br />
response. We are also engaging with The <strong>Law</strong> Society and other<br />
local law societies as well as trade bodies including the CHO and<br />
APIL. In early <strong>Jan</strong>uary our immediate Past President Alison Lobb<br />
and CLC Chair Kirsty McKno will meet with the Chair of the<br />
Transport Select Committee Louise Ellman to raise their awareness<br />
particularly with regard to the impact to accident victims not least<br />
that without representation they will not have the ability to access<br />
the MOJ portal to which claims must be submitted.<br />
If there are any LLS members who would wish to contribute in<br />
some way please do make contact via LLS or at<br />
Kirsty.mckno@compass-law.co.uk<br />
https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digitalcommunications/reforming-soft-tissue-injury-claims<br />
<br />
- <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Financial Orders: <strong>Law</strong> & Practice<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
- <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
www.liverpoollawsociety.co.uk<br />
9