23.12.2016 Views

Liverpool Law Jan 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PI <strong>Law</strong> Reform<br />

PI <strong>Law</strong> Reform Wolf in MOJ<br />

Consultation Sheeps’ Clothing<br />

The MOJ have released the consultation that the personal injury industry have been waiting for since<br />

George Osborne’s 2015 Autumn Statement (see website link details below). The consultation entitled<br />

“Reforming the Soft Tissue Injury “Whiplash” Claims Process” required a response by the 6th<br />

<strong>Jan</strong>uary <strong>2017</strong>. Kirsty McKno outlines the proposals and the Society’s reponse...<br />

Despite a number of representations to the MOJ with regard to the<br />

unreasonableness of the consultation period in view of the<br />

significance of the proposed changes and intervening Christmas<br />

period, including from <strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society, it has been confirmed<br />

that there is no intention to extend that period. The MOJ are<br />

working to a timeline around the legislative change that will be<br />

required if the proposals go ahead. This means that they wish to<br />

release their own response during April. Part 8 of the consultation<br />

specifically concerns implementation and confirms that it will be “as<br />

soon as possible”.<br />

George Osborne had originally stated that the intention behind the<br />

reform was to both reduce fraud and create a saving to private<br />

insurance premiums of £40 per annum. Interestingly the focus of the<br />

consultation is based more upon the saving that would be passed to<br />

policy holders from Insurers as a result of their making lower<br />

compensation payments rather than the costs of fraud. Those lower<br />

payments will be achieved by either removing the right to<br />

compensation for “whiplash” altogether or introducing a tariff<br />

where an injury of up to 6 months would attract an award of £400<br />

with an additional £25 payment for any psychiatric elements. The<br />

model extends up to a 24 month injury for which £3500 would be<br />

received although the definition of “whiplash” is yet to be defined.<br />

In addition to reduction by value of award there will be a reduction<br />

in volume achieved through raising the small claims limit for injury<br />

to £5000.<br />

There are far more points to be made about the proposal than this<br />

article permits many of which Capital Economics and Matthew<br />

Maxwell-Scott of Slater & Gordon <strong>Law</strong>yers were able to explain at a<br />

meeting held for <strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society members on 15th<br />

December. They presented information relating to the empirical data<br />

upon which the consultation has been based and that disproves for<br />

example that the costs of injury claims are £40 per annum and that<br />

raising the small claims limit would have unintended consequences<br />

that include the removal of access to justice for victims of<br />

employer’s liability and public liability claims. Capital Economics<br />

have engaged in surveys that are able to demonstrate the serious<br />

financial impact to Merseyside not just by the loss of legal jobs but<br />

in the loss of work for those businesses that provide services to the<br />

legal industry.<br />

Despite a number of representations<br />

to the MOJ with regard to the<br />

unreasonableness of the consultation<br />

period in view of the significance of<br />

the proposed changes and<br />

intervening Christmas period,<br />

including from <strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society,<br />

it has been confirmed that there is no<br />

intention to extend that period.<br />

<strong>Liverpool</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Society represent both Claimant and Defendant<br />

lawyers and it was good to see Defendant presence at the discussion.<br />

The consultation is not just a Claimant issue but one that will<br />

impact the industry as a whole and we are working to ensure that a<br />

broad spectrum of views are canvassed and represented in our<br />

response. We are also engaging with The <strong>Law</strong> Society and other<br />

local law societies as well as trade bodies including the CHO and<br />

APIL. In early <strong>Jan</strong>uary our immediate Past President Alison Lobb<br />

and CLC Chair Kirsty McKno will meet with the Chair of the<br />

Transport Select Committee Louise Ellman to raise their awareness<br />

particularly with regard to the impact to accident victims not least<br />

that without representation they will not have the ability to access<br />

the MOJ portal to which claims must be submitted.<br />

If there are any LLS members who would wish to contribute in<br />

some way please do make contact via LLS or at<br />

Kirsty.mckno@compass-law.co.uk<br />

https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digitalcommunications/reforming-soft-tissue-injury-claims<br />

<br />

- <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Financial Orders: <strong>Law</strong> & Practice<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

- <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

www.liverpoollawsociety.co.uk<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!