09.12.2012 Views

Report - European Union Institute for Security Studies

Report - European Union Institute for Security Studies

Report - European Union Institute for Security Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AGENDA<br />

Annex<br />

1. Background<br />

The end of the Cold War, and the associated disarmament process, has increased the<br />

importance of non proliferation of materials, technologies and weapons of mass destruction.<br />

Between 1992 and 2001, the US has committed on the order of 7 billion USD <strong>for</strong> its nonproliferation<br />

and threat reduction programmes, covering several areas of disarmament and<br />

non proliferation in Russia and other <strong>for</strong>mer Soviet states. Europe, both through projects of<br />

EU Member States or through <strong>European</strong> Community programmes, and Japan, have, over the<br />

same period, also initiated actions; nevertheless at a lower level of financial contribution.<br />

At the end of 1999, the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Union</strong> launched, in the frame of its Common Foreign and<br />

<strong>Security</strong> Policy, a Joint Action <strong>for</strong> non proliferation and disarmament of WMD in the Russian<br />

Federation. The main goal is to foster co-ordination at EU level and with other main players<br />

in the field. Two NDCI (Non proliferation and Disarmament Co-operation Initiative)<br />

Conferences, assembling governmental experts of 40 countries and 9 international<br />

organisations, have taken place in Brussels, in 2001 and 2002, to exchange in<strong>for</strong>mation on the<br />

scope and implementation of programmes.<br />

The dramatic events of the 11 September 2001 have added a new dimension to the threat<br />

associated with materials, technologies and weapons of mass destruction : the risk of<br />

diversion by non state actors. It has increased the focus and importance of the co-operative<br />

programmes fostering the securing and/or rapid elimination of weapons or materials.<br />

This resulted in the major initiative taken by the G8 Leaders in June 2002 at the Kananaskis<br />

Summit in Canada, called the G8 Global Partnership against the spread of weapons and<br />

materials of mass destruction. The raising of up to 20 billion USD, over the next ten years,<br />

has been committed by the Leaders, coupled with a set of non proliferation principles and<br />

guidelines <strong>for</strong> the effective implementation of programmes. The Evian Summit, in June 2003,<br />

took note of the progress, confirmed the importance to keep pace, drafted an Action Plan and<br />

started outreach activities to involve countries beyond the G8 into the endeavour.<br />

2. Purpose of the Conference<br />

While the topic is a priority subject of discussion within the US Government and the<br />

Congress, it has been, until very recently, less the case on the <strong>European</strong> side, in particular at<br />

the level of the EU Member States National Parliaments and the <strong>European</strong> Parliament. Cooperative<br />

threat reduction is nevertheless of vital importance <strong>for</strong> the security of our societies<br />

and there<strong>for</strong>e deserves awareness and attention by the Representatives of the People. Even<br />

more so today, since the topic of non proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction has<br />

recently received more attention by the <strong>European</strong> Council, as shown at the EU Council<br />

Meeting in Thessaloniki.<br />

This Conference is organised to in<strong>for</strong>m Members of Parliaments of the diverse bilateral and<br />

multilateral co-operative threat reduction programmes which are ongoing, most of them<br />

within the framework of the G8 Global Partnership against the spread of weapons and<br />

materials of mass destruction.<br />

The Conference should be the launch of a process whereby the Members of Parliaments<br />

would continue to be regularly in<strong>for</strong>med and further discuss the evolution of programmes, in<br />

order <strong>for</strong> them to play their roles in deciding, on an in<strong>for</strong>med basis, on budgets <strong>for</strong> further<br />

actions.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!