REVIEW
2k6MXzd
2k6MXzd
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE SWEDISH MARKET<br />
THE AVERAGE<br />
PROFIT MARGIN<br />
WAS 5.8% IN 2015.<br />
Price development in the sector has been<br />
sluggish now for a number of years. But a<br />
tendency towards improvement has been<br />
observed during 2015 and 2016. However,<br />
it is moving slowly and many companies<br />
are complaining about extensive price<br />
pressure, above all in connection with public<br />
sector procurements. In the latest member<br />
company opinion survey, 43 % of those<br />
questioned responded that they have raised<br />
their fees during the course of the year, at<br />
the same time as only 10 % stated that they<br />
have lowered their prices. This strengthens<br />
the picture of a price scenario in the process<br />
of recovery. But the weak price trend<br />
will be one of the sector’s major challenges<br />
in the months ahead.<br />
The profitability equation does not really<br />
add up, considering the current boom<br />
and demand for architect and engineering<br />
consultant services. The profitability<br />
should increase by considerably more than<br />
one tenth of a percentage point. The question<br />
is then, where in the equation has the<br />
error been made? Lack of assignments?<br />
No, the order books were full – to such<br />
an extent that the sector expanded by 8 %.<br />
On the other hand, there was a shortage of<br />
available competence, despite the fact that<br />
the sector grew by 4 000 employees during<br />
the course of the year. The billing levels<br />
increased. But so too did the payroll expenses<br />
– by as much as 5.2 % in 2015 (measured<br />
as the total payroll expenses per employee<br />
for the 300 largest companies in the<br />
sector). The prices, however, did not accompany<br />
the development. In a comparison<br />
of price development and payroll expenses<br />
between 2012 and 2016 (including<br />
September) the average fee charged by<br />
the engineering consultants increased by<br />
2.4 % during the period, the architects’ by<br />
6.8 % and the average fee of the industrial<br />
consultancies decreased by 3.5 %. At the<br />
same time, the average payroll expenses increased<br />
by 13 %. It is here that the equation<br />
does not really tally. If the average fees increased<br />
by between 0–5 % and the payroll<br />
expenses rose by 10–15 %, it is difficult to<br />
retain profitability even if the billing level<br />
is raised slightly. This is one of the sector’s<br />
major challenges in the months and years<br />
ahead. There are a number of possible solutions<br />
to this: 1. Companies manage to<br />
convince procurement managers of the<br />
Manpower development<br />
%<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
-20<br />
-40<br />
T2-3<br />
07<br />
Architect firms Engineering consultancies Industrial consultancies<br />
T1-3<br />
08<br />
T1-3<br />
09<br />
T1-3<br />
10<br />
T1-3<br />
11<br />
T1-3<br />
12<br />
T1-3<br />
13<br />
T1-3<br />
14<br />
Cityblock<br />
”Annedal” in<br />
Stockholm.<br />
The expectations regarding how manpower will develop show net figures between the proportion of<br />
firms which believe their working force will increase minus those who believe it will decrease over the<br />
coming six-month period.<br />
Source: The Swedish Federation of Consulting Engineers and Architects<br />
T1-3<br />
15<br />
T1-3<br />
16<br />
PHOTO: TORJUS DAHL<br />
100<br />
SECTOR <strong>REVIEW</strong> • THE SWEDISH FEDERATION OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS • DECEMBER 2016<br />
80<br />
60<br />
13