19.01.2017 Views

REVIEW

2k6MXzd

2k6MXzd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SWEDISH MARKET<br />

THE AVERAGE<br />

PROFIT MARGIN<br />

WAS 5.8% IN 2015.<br />

Price development in the sector has been<br />

sluggish now for a number of years. But a<br />

tendency towards improvement has been<br />

observed during 2015 and 2016. However,<br />

it is moving slowly and many companies<br />

are complaining about extensive price<br />

pressure, above all in connection with public<br />

sector procurements. In the latest member<br />

company opinion survey, 43 % of those<br />

questioned responded that they have raised<br />

their fees during the course of the year, at<br />

the same time as only 10 % stated that they<br />

have lowered their prices. This strengthens<br />

the picture of a price scenario in the process<br />

of recovery. But the weak price trend<br />

will be one of the sector’s major challenges<br />

in the months ahead.<br />

The profitability equation does not really<br />

add up, considering the current boom<br />

and demand for architect and engineering<br />

consultant services. The profitability<br />

should increase by considerably more than<br />

one tenth of a percentage point. The question<br />

is then, where in the equation has the<br />

error been made? Lack of assignments?<br />

No, the order books were full – to such<br />

an extent that the sector expanded by 8 %.<br />

On the other hand, there was a shortage of<br />

available competence, despite the fact that<br />

the sector grew by 4 000 employees during<br />

the course of the year. The billing levels<br />

increased. But so too did the payroll expenses<br />

– by as much as 5.2 % in 2015 (measured<br />

as the total payroll expenses per employee<br />

for the 300 largest companies in the<br />

sector). The prices, however, did not accompany<br />

the development. In a comparison<br />

of price development and payroll expenses<br />

between 2012 and 2016 (including<br />

September) the average fee charged by<br />

the engineering consultants increased by<br />

2.4 % during the period, the architects’ by<br />

6.8 % and the average fee of the industrial<br />

consultancies decreased by 3.5 %. At the<br />

same time, the average payroll expenses increased<br />

by 13 %. It is here that the equation<br />

does not really tally. If the average fees increased<br />

by between 0–5 % and the payroll<br />

expenses rose by 10–15 %, it is difficult to<br />

retain profitability even if the billing level<br />

is raised slightly. This is one of the sector’s<br />

major challenges in the months and years<br />

ahead. There are a number of possible solutions<br />

to this: 1. Companies manage to<br />

convince procurement managers of the<br />

Manpower development<br />

%<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

T2-3<br />

07<br />

Architect firms Engineering consultancies Industrial consultancies<br />

T1-3<br />

08<br />

T1-3<br />

09<br />

T1-3<br />

10<br />

T1-3<br />

11<br />

T1-3<br />

12<br />

T1-3<br />

13<br />

T1-3<br />

14<br />

Cityblock<br />

”Annedal” in<br />

Stockholm.<br />

The expectations regarding how manpower will develop show net figures between the proportion of<br />

firms which believe their working force will increase minus those who believe it will decrease over the<br />

coming six-month period.<br />

Source: The Swedish Federation of Consulting Engineers and Architects<br />

T1-3<br />

15<br />

T1-3<br />

16<br />

PHOTO: TORJUS DAHL<br />

100<br />

SECTOR <strong>REVIEW</strong> • THE SWEDISH FEDERATION OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS • DECEMBER 2016<br />

80<br />

60<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!