27.01.2017 Views

International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans

WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines

WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GUIDELINE 4:<br />

POTENTIAL INDIVIDUAL BENEFITS<br />

AND RISKS OF RESEARCH<br />

To justify imposing any research risks on participants in health research, the research<br />

must have social and scientific value. Be<strong>for</strong>e inviting potential participants to join a<br />

study, the researcher, sponsor and the research ethics committee must ensure that risks<br />

to participants are minimized and appropriately balanced in relation to the prospect of<br />

potential individual benefit and the social and scientific value of the research.<br />

The potential individual benefits and risks of research must be evaluated in a two-step<br />

process. First, the potential individual benefits and risks of each individual research<br />

intervention or procedure in the study must be evaluated.<br />

ff<br />

For research interventions or procedures that have the potential to benefit participants,<br />

risks are acceptable if they are minimized and outweighed by the prospect of potential<br />

individual benefit and the available evidence suggests that the intervention will be at<br />

least as advantageous, in the light of <strong>for</strong>eseeable risks and benefits, as any established<br />

effective alternative. There<strong>for</strong>e, as a general rule, participants in the control group of<br />

a trial must receive an established effective intervention. The conditions under which a<br />

placebo may be used are spelled out in Guideline 5 – Choice of control in clinical trials.<br />

ff<br />

For research interventions or procedures that offer no potential individual benefits to<br />

participants, the risks must be minimized and appropriate in relation to the social and<br />

scientific value of the knowledge to be gained (expected benefits to society from the<br />

generalizable knowledge).<br />

ff<br />

In general, when it is not possible or feasible to obtain the in<strong>for</strong>med consent of<br />

participants, research interventions or procedures that offer no potential individual<br />

benefits must pose no more than minimal risks. However, a research ethics committee<br />

may permit a minor increase above minimal risk when it is not possible to gather the<br />

necessary data in another population or in a less risky or burdensome manner, and the<br />

social and scientific value of the research is compelling (see Guideline 16 – <strong>Research</strong><br />

involving adults incapable of giving in<strong>for</strong>med consent, and Guideline 17 – <strong>Research</strong><br />

involving children and adolescents).<br />

Guideline 4: Potential individual benefits and risks of research<br />

In a second step, the aggregate risks and potential individual benefits of the entire study<br />

must be assessed and must be considered appropriate.<br />

ff<br />

The aggregate risks of all research interventions or procedures in a study must be<br />

considered appropriate in light of the potential individual benefits to participants and<br />

the scientific social value of the research.<br />

ff<br />

The researcher, sponsor and research ethics committee must also consider risks to<br />

groups and populations, including strategies to minimize these risks.<br />

INTERNATIONAL ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH-RELATED RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMANS<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!