06.02.2017 Views

Home health update for Medical Services Committee - Mason

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

HOME HEALTH UPDATE<br />

PPS REFORM RESEARCH; NEW COPS<br />

NASL Conference February 7, 2017<br />

Sherill <strong>Mason</strong><br />

<strong>Mason</strong> Advisors LLC<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


2<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

• The home <strong>health</strong> PPS has not been significantly revised since it took effect in<br />

2000<br />

• Much as in SNFs, payments are based on<br />

• The degree of functional impairment of a person<br />

• Clinical complexity<br />

• Volume of therapy visits<br />

• The payment system has been criticized as having a perverse incentive to<br />

over-utilize therapy while not paying enough <strong>for</strong> clinically complex care<br />

• CMS engaged a contractor to study PPS and in December, 2016 the<br />

contractor released a detailed technical report<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


3<br />

CURRENT HOME HEALTH PPS<br />

• Today, home <strong>health</strong> agencies are reimbursed <strong>for</strong> 60 day episodes of care<br />

• Agencies are reimbursed separately <strong>for</strong> non-routine medical supplies as well as<br />

disposable negative pressure wound therapy devices<br />

• There is no limit to the number of episodes a person can receive, but the<br />

average number of episodes per beneficiary is 1.9<br />

• There is no copayment or deductible<br />

• The first two 60 day episodes are considered “early” and are reimbursed at<br />

higher rates than “late” episodes<br />

• There are 153 different HHRGs<br />

• HHRGs are determined based on in<strong>for</strong>mation from the OASIS<br />

• Payments <strong>for</strong> episodes with four or fewer visits are considered LUPAs and are<br />

reimbursed on a per-visit basis<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


4<br />

HHGM MODEL<br />

• The <strong>Home</strong> Health Grouping Model (HHGM) would eliminate therapy<br />

thresholds in determining payments<br />

• HHGM would group episodes into clinical groups that describe the purpose<br />

of the episode<br />

• HHGM would use OASIS and non-OASIS items in the case mix system<br />

• HHGM measures resource use using a cost-per-minute approach, combining<br />

the non-routine supply payment with the episode payment<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


5<br />

HHGM MODEL<br />

• Under HHGM there would be two 30 day periods within each 60 day episode<br />

• Only the first 30 day period would be considered “early,” receiving a higher<br />

reimbursement rate than “late” periods<br />

• Admission source would be a factor in rates, with admissions from institutional<br />

settings reimbursed at higher rates than admissions from the community<br />

• There would be six clinical groupings, including:<br />

• Musculoskeletal rehabilitation<br />

• Neuro/stroke rehabilitation<br />

• Wounds<br />

• Medication management, teaching and assessment (MMTA)<br />

• Behavioral <strong>health</strong><br />

• Complex nursing interventions<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


6<br />

HHGM MODEL<br />

• There would be two or three functional levels<br />

• For patients in the behavioral <strong>health</strong> or musculoskeletal rehab categories, there<br />

would be two levels, low or high<br />

• For patients in other clinical groups, functional levels would be low, medium and<br />

high<br />

• There would be two comorbidity adjustment groups, including yes or no,<br />

based on secondary diagnoses<br />

• In total, there would be 128 possible different payment groups<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


7<br />

RESEARCH FINDINGS; ADDITIONAL DETAIL<br />

• A wide variation exists in the length of episodes<br />

• Variation is related to the admission source and the reason <strong>for</strong> receiving home <strong>health</strong><br />

• The average length of an episode was 46.1 days<br />

• Admissions from the community had an average length of 49.1 days<br />

• Admissions with a hospital stay within 7 days prior to admission had average stays <strong>for</strong> 37.8 days, but<br />

varied by DRG<br />

• LEJRs had an average length of 23.7 days<br />

• The following OASIS items are used in the model to determine functional status<br />

• M1800: Grooming<br />

• M1810: Current ability to dress upper body<br />

• M1820: Current ability to dress lower body<br />

• M1830: Bathing<br />

• M1840: Toilet transferring<br />

• M1850: Transferring<br />

• M1860: Ambulation and locomotion<br />

• M1032: Risk <strong>for</strong> hospitalization<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


8<br />

HHGM MODEL DETAIL<br />

• Abt created 13 broad clinical categories with 116 subcategories to determine<br />

comorbidity adjustments. These include<br />

• Heart disease (11)<br />

• Respiratory disease (9)<br />

• Circulatory disease and blood disorders (12)<br />

• Cerebral vascular disease (4)<br />

• Gastrointestinal disease (9)<br />

• Neurological and associated conditions (11)<br />

• Endocrine disease (6)<br />

• Neoplasms (24)<br />

• Genitourinary and renal disease (5)<br />

• Skin disease (5)<br />

• Musculoskeletal disease or injury (5)<br />

• Behavioral <strong>health</strong> (11)<br />

• Infectious diseases (4)<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


9<br />

IMPACT ON PAYMENT RATES<br />

• The average 30 day payment under today’s PPS and HHGM would be the<br />

same at $1,519.22<br />

• The new model pays more at the lower-center of distribution and less <strong>for</strong> the<br />

upper portion of distribution<br />

• For example, payments <strong>for</strong> the 50 th percentile would be $1,325.18 under current<br />

PPS vs. $1,435.43 under HHGM<br />

• Payments <strong>for</strong> the 95 th percentile would be $2,767.26 under current PPS and<br />

$2,476.01 under HHGM<br />

• On average, facility-based HHAs would see a 15% increase while<br />

freestanding would see a decline of -1.5%<br />

• Non-profits would see an average increase of 12.9% while <strong>for</strong>-profits would<br />

see an average decline of -4.7%<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


PAYMENTS FOR THERAPY EPISODES WOULD<br />

DECLINE IN FAVOR OF COMPLEX NURSING<br />

EPISODES<br />

• Episodes without therapy would see average increases of 25%, while therapy<br />

episodes would see an average decline of -10%<br />

• Episodes with admissions from institutional settings would see average<br />

increases of 29.5%, while episodes with admissions from the community<br />

would decline an average of -15%<br />

• Episodes falling into the Behavioral Health category would have reduced<br />

payments of 10%<br />

• Episodes in the Wound category would have increased payments of 25% to<br />

nearly 30% while Complex Nursing Intervention episodes would have<br />

average increases of 14% to 18%, depending on the degree of functional<br />

impairment<br />

10<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


11<br />

HOME HEALTH<br />

Conditions of Participation<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


12<br />

NEW COPS ARE HERE<br />

• On January 9, 2017, CMS released the final rule revising the home <strong>health</strong><br />

conditions of participation <strong>for</strong> the first time in 20 years<br />

• The new CoPs become effective July 13, 2017<br />

• The estimated cost to providers <strong>for</strong> the first year of implementation is $293.3M,<br />

and $290.1M per year thereafter<br />

• It is possible the new administration will review the rule and could either cancel<br />

or delay implementation<br />

• Overall, the industry response was neutral to positive<br />

• NAHC published an excellent cross-walk on their website<br />

www.nahc.org<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


13<br />

NEW COPS<br />

• Much of the work done on the CoPs was to re-organize existing CoPs in a more<br />

sensible manner<br />

• Certain items were <strong>update</strong>d to reflect current technology<br />

• On a broad basis, the CoPs are more patient-directed than be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

• Requirements were added to communicate in the patient’s primary or preferred<br />

language; the patient has a right to participate in the development of the plan of<br />

care, including receiving a copy of the plan and receiving all services included in<br />

the plan of care<br />

• The CoP requiring HHAs that provide outpatient therapy to meet all of the related<br />

conditions and <strong>health</strong> and safety requirements was changed from a CoP to a<br />

standard<br />

• Rather than having separate standards <strong>for</strong> therapists and nurses, skilled professionals<br />

are grouped together in their responsibilities related to assessment, development<br />

and updating plans of care, the provision of services, counseling and education,<br />

preparing clinical notes, participating in QAPI and communicating with physicians<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference


14<br />

QUESTIONS?<br />

Thank you so much!<br />

Sherill <strong>Mason</strong>, Principal, <strong>Mason</strong> Advisors LLC smason@masonadvisors.com<br />

NASL 2017 Winter Conference

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!