LIBERTY AND JUSTICE PRETRIAL PRACTICES IN TEXAS
170308_bond-study-report
170308_bond-study-report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Texas Judicial Council ..................................................................................................................................... v<br />
Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................... xvii<br />
Executive Summary. ................................................................................................................................... xvii<br />
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................1<br />
Part I: Evidence From Two Jurisdictions<br />
Overview of the Study Sites............................................................................................................................7<br />
Risk-Informed Pretrial Case Processing System: Travis County ............................................................................7<br />
Financial-Based Pretrial Release System: Tarrant County .................................................................................. 11<br />
Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 13<br />
F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>G 1: Validated pretrial risk assessment successfully predicts defendants’ chance of bond failure. ....... 15<br />
Risk Scores Predict Bail Failure ............................................................................................................................ 15<br />
Risk Scores Are Being Used to Inform Detention Decisions ................................................................................ 16<br />
Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 16<br />
F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>G 2: Similar decisions to release or detain defendants can be obtained using a lower-cost statistical<br />
algorithm instead of an interview-based risk assessment. ............................................................................. 17<br />
Efficacy of an Automated Risk Assessment Algorithm ........................................................................................ 17<br />
Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 18<br />
F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>G 3: Validated risk assessment results in better pretrial classification: fewer high-risk defendants are<br />
released, and fewer low-risk individuals are detained. .................................................................................. 19<br />
Release Based on Risk ......................................................................................................................................... 19<br />
Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 21<br />
F<strong>IN</strong>D<strong>IN</strong>G 4: The costs of a risk-informed pretrial release system are more than offset by savings that occur<br />
when defendants are properly classified....................................................................................................... 23<br />
4.1: Pretrial Program Costs ................................................................................................................................. 25<br />
4.2: Bail Failure Case Processing Costs ............................................................................................................... 26<br />
4.3: Victim Costs ................................................................................................................................................. 27<br />
4.4: Detention Costs ........................................................................................................................................... 29<br />
4.5: Misclassification Costs ................................................................................................................................. 30<br />
Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 31<br />
iii